purple team cover Giacomo Lanzi

Red Team, Blue Team and Purple Team: what are the differences?

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

When we talk about cybersecurity and find ourselves on the side of the attacked, we often limit ourselves to thinking in terms of defense, protection and containment of threats. However, the approach that works best is one in which you put yourself in the attacker’s shoes and treat your infrastructure as the target of their actions. Only in this way is it possible to address the discussion holistically and not from a single point of view. To execute this change of mentality, we refer to the various actors in the scene as teams: red team, blue team and purple team. Today we shed some light on the differences between the hacker teams involved in the action.

Definition of Teams and their purpose

The Red Teams are internal or external entities dedicated to testing the effectiveness of a security program emulating the tools and techniques of likely attackers as realistically as possible. The practice is similar to, but not identical to Penetration Testing, and involves the pursuit of one or more goals, usually performed as a campaign.

The Blue Team they refer to Internal security team that defends against both real attackers and Red Teams. Blue Teams must be distinguished from standard security teams in most organizations, as most security operations teams do not have a mindset of constant vigilance against attacks, which is the mission and outlook of a true Blue Team.

The best Blue Team members are those who can employ adversarial empathy techniques, that is, think deeply like the enemy. This mentality is usually dictated more than anything else by attacking experience.

This mentality is usually dictated more than anything else by attacking experience. They do this by integrating the defensive tactics and controls of the Blue Team with the threats and vulnerabilities found by the Red Team in a single action that maximizes both. Ideally, the Purple Team shouldn’t be a team, but rather a permanent dynamic between Red and Blue.

Purple Team Multiscreen

To further delve into the points of view, let’s take a closer look at the teams.

Red Team

Red Teams are often confused with Penetration Testers, but while they have a huge overlap in skills and functions, they are not the same thing. They have a number of attributes that separate them from other offensive security teams. The most important of these are:

1. Emulazione delle TTP(tecniche, tattiche e procedure)utilizzate dagli avversari. They use tools similar to bad actors: exploits, pivot methodologies and typical objectives of a black hat hacker.
2. Campaign-based testing that extends over an extended period of time, for example, multiple weeks or months of emulating the same attacker.

Penetration testing is when a security team uses standard tools, runs tests for only a week or two, and tries to achieve a standard set of objectives. For example, breaking into the internal network, stealing data or obtaining domain administration. A Red Team campaign uses a customized set of TTPs and objectives over an extended period of time.

Of course, you can create a Red Team campaign that uses the best known TTPs, a combination of ongoing pentesting tools, techniques and objectives, and run it as a campaign.

Blue Team

The goal here is not to protect entry, but rather to encourage curiosity and a proactive mindset. Blue Teams are a company’s proactive defenders from a cybersecurity perspective.

There are a number of defense-oriented tasks that are not considered worthy of the Blue Team. For example, a Level 1 SOC analyst who has no training or interest in offensive techniques, no curiosity about the interface he is looking at, and no creativity in following up on any potential alerts is unlikely to be a valuable member of a Blue Team.

All Blue Teams are defenders, but not all defenders are part of a Blue Team.

What constitutes a Blue Team member and differentiates it from dealing with defense is the mentality. Here’s how to make the distinction: Blue Teams have and use:

1. A proactive, non-reactive mindset
2. Deep curiosity about things that are out of the ordinary
3. Continuous improvement in detection and response

It’s not about whether someone is a self-taught Level 1 SOC analyst or a former Red Team member. It’s about curiosity and the desire to constantly improve.

Purple Team

The Purple Team is more of a cooperative mindset between attackers and defenders working on the same side. As such, it should be thought of as a function rather than a separate team.

The true purpose of a Red Team is to find ways to improve the Blue Team, so Purple Teams should not be necessary in organizations where Red Team/Blue Team interaction is healthy and functioning properly.

The best uses of the term Purple Team are when a group unfamiliar with offensive techniques wants to learn how attackers think. It could be an incident response group, a detection group, a developer group, anything. If the good guys are trying to learn from white hat hackers, this can be considered a Purple Team exercise.

Purple Team Collaboration

Conclusions

While Red and Blue Teams have the same goal of improving an organization’s security, they are too often unwilling to share their “secrets.” Attackers sometimes don’t reveal the methods they used to infiltrate systems, while defense teams don’t say how attacks were detected and blocked.

However, sharing these “secrets” is critical to strengthening the company’s security posture. The value of the red and blue teams is null if they do not share their research and reporting data. This is where the Purple Team comes in.

Purple Team members get their Red and Blue teammates to work together and share insights into their assets, relationships and knowledge. To do this, you should focus on promoting communication and collaboration between members of the two core teams.

How to use these mentalities in the company

When you outsource enterprise security with SOCaaS and the execution of Vulnerability Assessments and Penetration Tests, the various teams are completely external. The services offered by SOD are based on best practices regarding the work of Red and Blue Teams, generating a Purple Team mentality.

With us the security of your company is in good hands. Our engineers have experience and are used to collaborating to achieve maximum results.

Contact us to find out more about how our services can help in corporate defense, we will be happy to answer any questions.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Monero 18.3.4 zero-day DoS vulnerability has been dropped publicly on social network. February 16, 2025
    Posted by upper.underflow via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16Hello, About an hour ago, a group appearing to be named WyRCV2 posted a note on the nostr social network, which can be found at the following link: https://primal.net/e/note1vzh0mj9rcxax9cgcdapupyxeehjprd68gd9kk9wrv939m8knulrs4780x7 Save, share, use. The paste link includes a list of nodes that the attacker has instructed to target, along […]
  • Netgear Router Administrative Web Interface Lacks Transport Encryption By Default February 16, 2025
    Posted by Ryan Delaney via Fulldisclosure on Feb 16
  • [CVE-2024-54756] GZDoom <= 4.13.1 Arbitrary Code Execution via Malicious ZScript February 16, 2025
    Posted by Gabriel Valachi via Fulldisclosure on Feb 15In GZDoom 4.13.1 and below, there is a vulnerability involving array sizes in ZScript, the game engine&apos;s primary scripting language. It is possible to dynamically allocate an array of 1073741823 dwords, permitting access to the rest of the heap from the start of the array and causing […]
  • Re: Text injection on https://www.google.com/sorry/index via ?q parameter (no XSS) February 16, 2025
    Posted by David Fifield on Feb 15Today at about 2025-02-13 19:00 I noticed the "≠" is back, but now the type 0x12 payload of the ?q query parameter gets formatted into the string representation of an IP address, rather than being copied almost verbatim into the page. If the payload length is 4 bytes, it […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250211-0 :: Multiple vulnerabilities in Wattsense Bridge February 13, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Feb 12SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250211-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple vulnerabilities product: Wattsense - Wattsense Bridge vulnerable version: Wattsense Bridge * Hardware Revision: WSG-EU-SC-14-00, 20230801 * Firmware Revision: Wattsense (Wattsense minimal)...
  • APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-2 iPadOS 17.7.5 February 11, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Feb 10APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-2 iPadOS 17.7.5 iPadOS 17.7.5 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122173. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Accessibility Available for: iPad Pro 12.9-inch 2nd generation, iPad Pro 10.5-inch, […]
  • APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-1 iOS 18.3.1 and iPadOS 18.3.1 February 11, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Feb 10APPLE-SA-02-10-2025-1 iOS 18.3.1 and iPadOS 18.3.1 iOS 18.3.1 and iPadOS 18.3.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122174. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Accessibility Available for: iPhone XS […]
  • CVE-2024-55447: Access Control in Paxton Net2 software (update) February 11, 2025
    Posted by Jeroen Hermans via Fulldisclosure on Feb 10CloudAware Security Advisory CVE-2024-55447: Potential PII leak and incorrect access control in Paxton Net2 software ======================================================================== Summary ======================================================================== Insecure backend database in the Paxton Net2 software. Possible leaking of PII incorrect access control. Access cards can be cloned without physical access to the original...
  • ChatGPT AI finds "security concern" (XSS) in DeepSeek's code February 11, 2025
    Posted by Georgi Guninski on Feb 10Summary: On 2025-02-09 ChatGPT AI found "security concern" (XSS) in DeepSeek&apos;s AI python code. Background: Consider the simple coding question (Q): Write Python CGI which takes as an argument NAME and outputs: "Hello NAME". First page and results on google for "python CGI" return for me tutorials, which are […]
  • KL-001-2025-002: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution February 4, 2025
    Posted by KoreLogic Disclosures via Fulldisclosure on Feb 04KL-001-2025-002: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution Title: Checkmk NagVis Remote Code Execution Advisory ID: KL-001-2025-002 Publication Date: 2025-02-04 Publication URL: https://korelogic.com/Resources/Advisories/KL-001-2025-002.txt 1. Vulnerability Details      Affected Vendor: Checkmk      Affected Product: Checkmk/NagVis      Affected Version: Checkmk 2.3.0p2, NagVis 1.9.40      Platform: GNU/Linux      CWE...

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}