pentest e sicurezza informatica Piergiorgio Venuti

Security: pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

The computer security of a system is very important to avoid unpleasant inconveniences due to malicious attacks. In principle, it is not enough to set up a complete security system, you must also check that the above systems are working. To do this we turn to professionals who can carry out pentest (penetration tests) and carry out a vulnerability check.

To verify the security of a system, two specific procedures are used. The first, the verification of vulnerabilities, deals with researching and listing the possible breaches in the infrastructure. The second, the Penetration Test (PenTest), seeks to exploit the weaknesses identified to gain access to a closed system.

In essence it is a question of doing what an attacker would do: use his tools by checking their effectiveness or not on the security system. If these operations are carried out in a controlled environment, it will be possible to take measures before a real harmful intrusion occurs.

Vulnerability verification

Known as vulnerability assessment or VA, it is the process of identifying threats and vulnerabilities on a specific machine or network.

The process tends to take place in the following phases:

Analysis of the characteristics
      Using automatic software to speed up the process, one identifies the general characteristics of a target.
Identification of weak points
      We identify which are the weak points that could be exploited to hit the target.
Specific manual tests
      Sometimes a series of manual tests are carried out with specific tools. This is to further assess the security of specific applications or networks and to verify previously detected vulnerabilities.
Writing a report
      After identifying the weak points of a goal, a document is drawn up stating the results.
A vulnerability check is important if understood as a proactive check carried out cyclically. Discovering vulnerabilities in order to be able to repair the identified problems is essential in the context of a security management program.

A serious security management program also includes penetration tests. However, the latter will be required less frequently than the VA. Vulnerability verification should be performed frequently. Only in this way can you be sure to immediately identify the weak points of a system and reduce the chances of a successful attack.

Pentest

A penetration test, or PenTest, consists of a series of manual processes. In general, the ultimate goal of an ethical hacker carrying out such a test is to gain unauthorized access to a target. To do this, vulnerabilities discovered in the verification phase are also used.

A pentest is often required in various scenarios which may include:

   – the launch of a new application
   – a major change or update of the network
   – adaptation to new compliance regulations
   – a violation due to a targeted attack
Since there are various reasons for conducting a pentest, the goals you set yourself can often differ widely.

Who usually performs a pentest / VA?

The technicians who deal with it are hackers, obviously the so-called white-hats, those who exploit their knowledge for good. A pentester team may however have an extremely diverse background in education and experience.

What I really care ‘that all have one thing in common: a passion for safety and great curiosity’ to find and test the weaknesses of a system.

pentest

Could the work be automated?

The short answer is: yes and no. There are some phases that take place automatically and others that require the intervention of a technician.

The main stage of a vulnerability assessment is carried out by an automated application that will perform checks on a network, application or code. The whole execution of this phase is automatic. However, setting up this step and subsequent reporting are all manual actions.

In addition, a pentest requires much more manual labor and cannot be automated. It can happen, in fact, that during a pentest there are new breaches that had not been identified before.

Most of a pentest is the result of manual labor by testers. The software used can only provide data which will then be analyzed in depth by the technicians.

The manual test of a large application can take a lot of time, resources and a lot of previous knowledge on the architecture of the web-apps and on the test frameworks used.

Cyber security

The issue of security usually comes to the surface only when it is too late and an attack has already been carried out. If there is a need to manage sensitive data, complex networks or simply want to be sure not to suffer damage, planning infrastructure verification actions is vital.

If you are interested in the security of your web app or corporate network, contact us.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Test

 

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [REVIVE-SA-2026-002] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities June 5, 2026
    Posted by Matteo Beccati on Jun 04======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2026-002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2026-002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2026-06-03 Risk Level: Medium to High Applications affected: Revive Adserver Versions...
  • CyberDanube Security Research 20260528-0 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mennekes Amtron Series June 1, 2026
    Posted by Thomas Weber | CyberDanube via Fulldisclosure on May 31CyberDanube Security Research 20260528-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Multiple Vulnerabilities product| Mennekes Amtron Series and Smart-T PnC vulnerable version| 5.22.3 fixed version| 5.33.11-21500 CVE number| CVE-2026-8979, CVE-2026-8980 impact| High homepage| https://www.mennekes.at/ found|...
  • bmcweb (OpenBMC web server): four vulnerabilities — two unfixed, GHSA without a CVE June 1, 2026
    Posted by binreaper via Fulldisclosure on May 31Hi all, Posting a brief summary of a four-finding disclosure on bmcweb (the OpenBMC HTTP/Redfish web server), which ships in BMC firmware on most modern enterprise servers — Intel, IBM, HPE, NVIDIA, and various ODMs. Full timeline and analysis on the blog: https://binreaper.pages.dev/posts/2026-05-27-bmcweb-disclosure/ ## Why bmcweb matters A […]
  • Re: Dovecot Security Advisory OXDC-2026-0002 May 26, 2026
    Posted by Noel Butler via Fulldisclosure on May 25So when is the fix for dovecot 2.3 source code due to be released? Since by your wording by not including the first detected versions, it must be assumed 2.3 is affected, and as no EOL has been published or announced for 2.3.x, and as 2.3 is […]
  • SSRF in Anthropic mcp-server-fetch and Microsoft playwright-mcp — publicly disclosed via GitHub issues May 26, 2026
    Posted by outreach on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Title: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Anthropic mcp-server-fetch and Microsoft playwright-mcp Author: Syed Anas Mohiuddin Date: May 25, 2026 CVSS: 7.5 (HIGH) — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N References: Already public via GitHub issues (see below) == AFFECTED PRODUCTS == 1. Anthropic mcp-server-fetch (modelcontextprotocol/servers) All versions as of May...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2021-21735 - ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 Unauthenticated Admin Credential Leak May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2021-001 CVE ID: CVE-2021-21735 Title: ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 - Unauthenticated Wizard Credential Disclosure to Full Admin Compromise Affected: ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public URL:...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34474 - ZTE H298A/H108N Unauthenticated Admin Credential Exposure May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-003 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34474 Title: ZTE ZXHN H298A / H108N - Unauthenticated Admin Password & WLAN Credential Exposure Affected: ZTE ZXHN H298A 1.1, ZTE ZXHN H108N 2.6 (EOL; no patch planned) Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public […]
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34472 - ZTE ZXHN H188A V6 Authentication Bypass via Pre-Login Wizard May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-002 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34472 Title: ZTE ZXHN H188A V6 - Authentication Bypass via Pre-Login Wizard Credential Leakage Affected: ZTE ZXHN H188A V6.0.10P2_TE, V6.0.10P3N3_TE Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public URL:...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34473 - Unauthenticated DoS in 17+ ZTE Router Models (140K+ Devices) May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-001 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34473 Title: Unauthenticated Denial of Service via Oversized POST Body in ZTE Router CGILua Parser Affected: 17+ ZTE ZXHN router models (~140,000 publicly exposed devices) CVSS Score: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail...
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Sparx Pro Cloud Server and Enterprise Architect May 26, 2026
    Posted by Adamczyk Blazej on May 25━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Multiple vulnerabilities in Sparx Pro Cloud Server and Enterprise Architect ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ General...

Customers