Active Defence Deception Piergiorgio Venuti

Active Defense Deception: cybersecurity that beats hackers with their own weapons

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

We pay hackers their own coin by using the same defenses and techniques that malware uses against computer systems by modeling the attackers’ decision-making process.

What is Active Defense Detection

The Active Defense Deception is an innovative cybersecurity service offered by the Cyberfero company to protect companies from the most sophisticated cyber attacks.

It is a deception technology solution that uses preventive deception techniques to confuse and hinder hackers in the initial stages of an attack, even before they can compromise systems.

How deception technology works

Deception technology is based on the creation within the corporate network of virtual decoys and traps that look like real assets such as servers, workstations, IoT devices, etc. In reality, these are fictitious systems whose purpose is to attract the attention of hackers and mislead them.

When a cybercriminal tries to compromise these false assets, the Active Defense Deception system gathers valuable information about his techniques and tactics, causing him confusion and leading him astray. In this way the threat is neutralized before it can even reach and damage the real corporate assets.

The benefits of deception technology

Active Defense Detection has several advantages over traditional cybersecurity solutions:

  • Proactive Protection – Prevents attacks instead of simply detecting and blocking them. Confuse hackers before they can do any damage.
  • Effectiveness against unknown threats – Works even against new and never-before-seen attacks, as it is not signature-based.
  • Intelligence Gathering – Observe and analyze hacker tactics by providing valuable threat intelligence data.
  • Ease of Deployment – Can be seamlessly integrated into existing IT infrastructure.
  • Low impact on performance – Does not burden the network with massive scans and continuous monitoring.

How the Cyberfero service works

The Cyberfero Active Defense Deception service operates in the following ways:

  • Installing sensors and deceiver software on customer systems to deploy virtual baits and traps.
  • 24/7 monitoring from Security Operation Center (SOC) to detect suspicious interactions.
  • Collection of information on the hacker’s techniques to reconstruct the attack’s kill chain.
  • Immediate blocking of the threat and alerting the customer.
  • In-depth analysis of what happened to learn and perfect defenses.

The service is managed entirely by Cyberfero experts, with no need for specific skills on the part of the customer.

Active Defense Deception: The kill chain of cyber attacks

To better understand how Active Defense Detection works, it is useful to know the concept of cyber kill chain.

The kill chain describes the typical sequential stages that make up most advanced cyberattacks:

Phase 1 – Reconnaissance

In the initial phase, the hacker collects as much information as possible about the target company, its digital assets, networks and security systems adopted. The goal is to identify exploitable vulnerabilities.

Phase 2 – Initial login

By exploiting the identified vulnerabilities, the attacker tries to gain initial access to the corporate network, for example by infecting an endpoint with malware or exploiting compromised credentials.

Phase 3 – Privilege Escalation

Once initial access is gained, the cybercriminal attempts to elevate their privileges to access critical systems and data. For example by stealing administrator credentials.

Stage 4 – Lateral movement

The hacker moves laterally within the network to reach his ultimate goal, such as servers with sensitive or valuable data.

Stage 5 – Final Goal

In the final stage the attacker achieves his goal, for example by exfiltrating or encrypting data with ransomware.

How Deception Technology works

Active Defence Deception

Active Defense Deception acts early in the kill chain, hindering and confusing the attacker so that he can never progress towards the advanced stages of the raid.

During the reconnaissance phase, the system deceives the hacker into believing that the network contains non-existent or misleading resources that attract his attention, wasting time and energy.

In the initial access phase, virtual traps trap the malware or attacker into dead-end paths that keep them away from critical systems.

In the privilege escalation phase, false credentials lead the intruder into dead ends by preventing him from escalating his privileges.

In this way the threat is constantly deflected, disoriented and finally neutralized before it can progress towards a malicious intrusion. In this way the threat is constantly deflected, disoriented and finally neutralized before it can progress towards a malicious intrusion.

Combine Deception and SOC for total protection

While Anti-Malware solutions and EDRs stop threats by detecting them, and SOC systems monitor and investigate alerts, Deception Technology prevents attacks by stopping them before they even happen.

For this reason, Active Defense Deception is the perfect complement to complement SOC (Security Operation Center) services to create truly complete and effective multi-level protection.

Cyberfero managed SOC provides real-time monitoring, detection and incident response. Deception technology prevents and deceives attacks before they can compromise real assets.

Used together, these defense capabilities make it possible to significantly improve the level of security of the IT infrastructure of client companies, against all types of cyber threats.

Conclusions on Active Defense Deception

The Active Defense Deception of Cyberfero represents the evolution of cybersecurity towards a more proactive approach that predicts and hinders the hacker’s moves rather than just reacting.

Rivolgendosi alle fasi iniziali della kill chain degli attacchi informatici, la deception technology li impedisce sul nascere ingannando il criminale con trappole ed esche virtuali.

Integrated with advanced SOC services, this active prevention capability allows for unmatched multi-layered protection against any type of cyber threat.

Companies can thus prevent the damage caused by security breaches, which involve not only direct financial losses but also potentially disastrous reputational impacts.

Thanks to Active Defense Deception, attacks are stopped even before they are completed, without compromising company operations and business continuity.

The innovative approach of deception technology marks the evolution from a passive cybersecurity based on detecting and blocking threats, to an active one that sets traps for hackers to confuse and mislead them.

In a landscape of increasingly sophisticated cyber risks, this ability to think and act like a cybercriminal is essential to protect the digital assets of companies.

Cyberfero has the know-how and skills to take companies into the future of IT security thanks to cutting-edge services such as Active Defense Detection, managed 24/7 by qualified professionals.

The combination of proactive prevention, real-time monitoring, threat intelligence and rapid response enables comprehensive, multi-dimensional protection to counter today’s and future threats.

For more information on Active Defense Detection solutions and how to integrate them into your cybersecurity systems, contact the Cyberfero experts.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Apache Struts2 Core Arbitrary Code Execution via OGNL Sandbox Escape November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below attempt to prevent arbitrary code execution via Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) through several different mechanisms but only in a cursory fashion -- the libraries only guard against immediate calls evaluated by the OGNL engine via `SecurityMemberAccess`, but an allowed […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core TokenHelper Token Cryptographic Timing Side-Channel November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Core 7.4.0 and below performs session token comparisons cryptographically insecure early-exit comparison functions (e.g., `!=`, `memcmp`, byte-by-byte loops with `break`) that return as soon as the first mismatched byte is encountered. The execution time of the comparison is therefore proportional to the number […]
  • Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin Uses a Previously Closed Resource November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin opens a Spring `ApplicationContex` via a try-with-resources block and, outside of said block, then continues to use the closed resource, resulting in an uncaught `IllegalStateException`. This particular issue prevents proper functionality and indicates poor code quality and code review standards and […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Integer Overflow November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below fails to properly prevent integer overflows, causing wrap-arounds and other issues on a downstream forced casting into types smaller than `BigInteger`. Importantly, this finding underscores why all applications using Struts and other such platforms should perform their own input […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Cross-Origin Protection Exemption Miskeyed to a Deployment-Wide Path November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below's `FetchMetadataInterceptor`, `CoepInterceptor`, and `CoopInterceptor` each compare their `exemptedPaths` configuration -- a per-interceptor-reference, administrator-supplied set of paths intended to exempt specific actions from the corresponding cross-origin protection -- against `HttpServletRequest.getContextPath()`. `getContextPath()` is fixed for the entire deployed web...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Fails to Properly Parse Chunked Requests November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's (version 7.4.0 and below) `ContentTypeInterceptor.intercept(ActionInvocation)` only deserialises a request body and enforces the `struts.rest.content.maxLength` bound when `HttpServletRequest#getContentLength()` returns a positive value. `getContentLength()` returns `-1` whenever the `Content-Length` header is absent, which normal and appropriate for any Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Untrimmed `Accept` Header Tokens Break Content Negation Fallback November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's `DefaultContentTypeHandlerManager.getHandlerForResponse(HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse)` splits the `Accept` header on commas and passes each resulting token directly to `findHandler(String)` without trimming leading or trailing whitespace. `findHandler(String)` only retries a trimmed lookup when a token contains a semicolon (`;`), so a token that merely carries […]
  • Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin Insecure Deserialisation -- Object Deserialisation Element-Count Limit Bypass November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01As of the current versions of the Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin (e.g., version 7.4.0 and the 7.5.0 snapshot dated 28 October 2026), attackers can bypass the element-count limit purported to protect Object deserialisation added to said code as part of the WW-5618 and S2-072 "hardening controls". Please […]
  • [0day-rubbish] NETGEAR RAX120 V1.2.5.18 authenticated SOAP InstallApp OS command injection to root-configured web-stack execution (6.8 Medium; conditionally 7.2 High with management exposure) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in NETGEAR RAX120 (Nighthawk AX12) firmware V1.2.5.18, the WiFi 6 consumer router from NETGEAR (United States), built on the Qualcomm IPQ8074 platform. The administrative web plane of this firmware generation is a lighttpd server fronting the vendor's DNI-framework CGI […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Raritan PX3 PDU G4 firmware 4.3.14 command injection in the ping and traceroute diagnostics through an inverted hostname-validation return check (8.8) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in the Raritan PX3 PDU G4, firmware version 4.3.14, the intelligent rack power distribution unit from Raritan, a Legrand company (United States). A low-privilege authenticated session converts one diagnostics request into operating-system command execution in the product's web-service context, […]

Customers