Sicurezza delle reti informatiche con il Pentest e il Vulnerability assessment Giacomo Lanzi

Computer network security: PT vs. VA

The security of computer networks is of vital importance for a company. With technologies increasingly relying on remote services, it is good to ensure that security is guaranteed. To do this, two tools are used: Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Test. But what is the difference between them? The answer to this question is not as obvious as one might think.

The short answer is: a Pentest (PT) may be a form of vulnerability assessment (VA), but a vulnerability assessment is definitely not a Pentest. Let’s try to better understand how they work and their purposes.

Verification of the security of computer networks: Vulnerability Assessment

A vulnerability assessment is the process of running automated tools against defined IP addresses to identify vulnerabilities in the environment in which one operates. Vulnerabilities typically include unprotected or misconfigured systems. The tools used to perform vulnerability scans are specific software that automates the process. Obviously these software are practically useless without an operator who knows how to use them correctly.

These tools provide an easy way to scan for vulnerabilities and there are both open source and proprietary ones. The main advantage of the open-source ones is that, with great probability, they are the same ones used by hackers, they are unlikely to pay an expensive subscription, when they can download open source applications for free.

In practice, a VA allows you to:

identify and classify security holes in the computer network
understand the cyber threats to which the company is exposed
recommend corrective measures to eliminate the weaknesses found

The purpose of a Vulnerability Assessment is to identify known vulnerabilities so that they can be corrected. Scans are typically done at least quarterly, although many experts recommend monthly scans.

How to perform a VA

Il processo di esecuzione si divide in due fasi e non prevede lo sfruttamento delle debolezze riscontrate. Questo ulteriore passaggio e’ invece previsto nel Penetration Test.

Fase 1: prima analisi
durante questa fase vengono raccolte tutte le informazioni disponibili sull’obiettivo per determinare quali potrebbero essere i punti deboli e le falle nel sistema di sicurezza delle reti informatiche
Fase 2: seconda analisi
in questa fase, tramite l’uso delle informazioni ricavate, vengono messe alla prova i possibili problemi. In questa fase le vulnerabilita’ sono testate per capire se siano effettivi problemi come supposto precedentemente.

Data l’incredibile velocita’ in cui le tecnologie e le tecniche informatiche si evolvono, e’ possibile che un sistema si mostri sicuro questo mese, ma abbia invece delle criticita’ da risolvere il mese successivo. Per questo e’ consigliato ripetere regolarmente e con frequenza i controlli di sicurezza sulle reti informatiche aziendali.

 

The execution process is divided into two phases and does not involve exploiting the weaknesses found. This further step is instead foreseen in the Penetration Test.

Phase 1: first analysis
during this phase, all the information available on the objective is collected to determine what could be the weak points and gaps in the security system of computer networks
Phase 2: second analysis
in this phase, through the use of the information obtained, possible problems are put to the test. In this phase the vulnerabilities are tested to understand if they are actual problems as previously assumed.
Given the incredible speed at which computer technologies and techniques evolve, it is possible that a system will prove secure this month, but instead have some problems to solve the following month. For this reason, it is advisable to repeat the security checks on company computer networks regularly and frequently.

Results

At the end of the process of verifying the vulnerabilities of a system, the final reports contain all the results collected. Typically these enclose all relevant information, including:

the list of vulnerabilities found
an in-depth description of the vulnerabilities
countermeasures to be adopted to reduce risks

Verification of vulnerabilities is a fundamental procedure for the company, but it does not guarantee the security of computer networks. For the correct maintenance of the security of your systems, it is also essential to use another tool: the Penetration Test.

Penetration test

The Pentest, or penetration test, is aimed at verifying how the vulnerabilities of a system can be exploited to gain access and move within it. One of the initial steps performed by a pentester is scanning the network to find IP addresses, device type, operating systems and possible system vulnerabilities. But unlike the Vulnerability Assessment, the Pentest doesn’t stop there.

Of crucial importance for a tester is the exploit of identified vulnerabilities in order to gain control of the network or to take possession of sensitive data. The tester uses configurable automated tools to perform exploits against computer network systems. The peculiar part, however, occurs when the tester performs manual exploit attempts, just like a hacker would.

Classification

Penetration tests are classified in two ways: gray box or black box.

Gray box tests are performed with full knowledge of the target company’s IT department. Information is shared with the tester, such as network diagrams, IP addresses, and system configurations. The approach of this method is the verification of the safety of the present technology.

A black box test, on the other hand, represents more properly the action of a hacker who tries to gain unauthorized access to a system. The IT department knows nothing about the test being performed and the tester is not provided with information about the target environment. The black box method evaluates both the underlying technology and the people and processes involved to identify and block an attack as it would happen in the real world.

Phases of the Pentest

Phase 1: Analysis
The system is analyzed, studying its strengths and weaknesses. All preliminary information is collected. This, of course, does not happen if it is a gray box pentest.
Phase 2: Scan
The entire infrastructure is scanned to find the weak points to focus on.
Phase 3: Planning
Thanks to the information gathered, we plan with which tools and techniques to use to hit the system. The possibilities are many and they are both purely technological and social engineering techniques.
Phase 4: actual attack
In this phase the testers try to exploit the identified vulnerabilities to gain full control of the targeted system.

Report

At the end of the Penetration Test, a report is also compiled that details the entire process carried out and includes:

evaluation of the impact of a real attack on the company
solutions to solve problems and secure computer network systems

A Penetration Test that is not successful is a sign that the system under examination is safe * and the data inside it does not risk anything. However, this does not mean that the company will be protected forever from any attack: precisely because the strategies of hackers constantly evolve, it is important to carry out Penetration Tests regularly.

(*) It should be noted, however, that although a good Penetration Test follows guidelines or structuring methodologies (i.e. OWASP) it remains a test with a strong subjective impact of the Penetration Tester and of the team that performed it, therefore it cannot be excluded that by repeating the tests carried out by a different group of Penetration Tester we have no new results. Furthermore, as is well known to our readers, in the field of Cyber ​​Security the concept of “safe” in absolute terms is inadequate.

How to do

Although Vulnerability Assessments and Penetration Tests have different objectives, both should be performed regularly to verify the overall security of the information system.

Vulnerability assessment should be done often to identify and fix known vulnerabilities. The Pentest should be carried out at least once a year and certainly after significant changes in the IT environment, to identify possible exploitable vulnerabilities that may allow unauthorized access to the system. Both of the services described in this article are available through SOD, even on a recursive basis to ensure test effectiveness. contact us to find out more.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

Security: pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Test

 

 

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [IWCC 2025] CfP: 14th International Workshop on Cyber Crime - Ghent, Belgium, Aug 11-14, 2025 April 27, 2025
    Posted by Artur Janicki via Fulldisclosure on Apr 26[APOLOGIES FOR CROSS-POSTING] CALL FOR PAPERS 14th International Workshop on Cyber Crime (IWCC 2025 - https://2025.ares-conference.eu/program/iwcc/) to be held in conjunction with the 20th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2025 - http://2025.ares-conference.eu) August 11-14, 2025, Ghent, Belgium IMPORTANT DATES Submission Deadline May 12, 2025 […]
  • Inedo ProGet Insecure Reflection and CSRF Vulnerabilities April 27, 2025
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Apr 26Inedo ProGet 2024.22 and below are vulnerable to unauthenticated denial of service and information disclosure attacks (among other things) because the information system directly exposes the C# reflection used during the request-action mapping process and fails to properly protect certain pathways. These are amplified by cross-site request […]
  • Ruby on Rails Cross-Site Request Forgery April 27, 2025
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Apr 26Good morning. All current versions and all versions since the 2022/2023 "fix" to the Rails cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protections continue to be vulnerable to the same attacks as the 2022 implementation. Currently, Rails generates "authenticity tokens" and "csrf tokens" using a random "one time pad" (OTP). […]
  • Microsoft ".library-ms" File / NTLM Information Disclosure (Resurrected 2025) April 27, 2025
    Posted by hyp3rlinx on Apr 26[-] Microsoft ".library-ms" File / NTLM Information Disclosure Spoofing (Resurrected 2025) / CVE-2025-24054 [+] John Page (aka hyp3rlinx) [+] x.com/hyp3rlinx [+] ISR: ApparitionSec Back in 2018, I reported a ".library-ms" File NTLM information disclosure vulnerability to MSRC and was told "it was not severe enough", that being said I post […]
  • HNS-2025-10 - HN Security Advisory - Local privilege escalation in Zyxel uOS April 24, 2025
    Posted by Marco Ivaldi on Apr 23Hi, Please find attached a security advisory that describes some vulnerabilities we discovered in the Zyxel uOS Linux-based operating system. * Title: Local privilege escalation via Zyxel fermion-wrapper * Product: USG FLEX H Series * OS: Zyxel uOS V1.31 (and potentially earlier versions) * Author: Marco Ivaldi * Date: […]
  • APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-4 visionOS 2.4.1 April 24, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Apr 23APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-4 visionOS 2.4.1 visionOS 2.4.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122402. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. CoreAudio Available for: Apple Vision Pro Impact: Processing an audio stream […]
  • APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-3 tvOS 18.4.1 April 24, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Apr 23APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-3 tvOS 18.4.1 tvOS 18.4.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122401. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. CoreAudio Available for: Apple TV HD and Apple TV 4K (all […]
  • APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-2 macOS Sequoia 15.4.1 April 24, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Apr 23APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-2 macOS Sequoia 15.4.1 macOS Sequoia 15.4.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122400. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. CoreAudio Available for: macOS Sequoia Impact: Processing an audio […]
  • APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-1 iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1 April 24, 2025
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Apr 23APPLE-SA-04-16-2025-1 iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1 iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/122282. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. CoreAudio Available for: iPhone XS […]
  • Business Logic Flaw: Price Manipulation - AlegroCartv1.2.9 April 24, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Apr 23# Exploit Title: Business Logic Flaw: Price Manipulation - alegrocartv1.2.9 # Date: 04/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 1.2.9 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ Business Logic Flaw: Price Manipulation #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit the store and add a product 2. Intercept the […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}