Data Exfiltration cover Giacomo Lanzi

Data Exfiltration: defense against data theft

A common definition of data exfiltration is the theft, removal, or unauthorized movement of any data from a device. Data exfiltration typically involves a cybercriminal stealing data from personal or corporate devices, such as computers and cell phones, through various cyberattack methods.

Failure to control information security can lead to data loss which can cause financial and reputational damage to an organization.

How does a data exfiltration happen?

Data exfiltration occurs in two ways, through attacks from outsiders and through threats from within. Both are major risks, and organizations need to ensure their data is protected by detecting and preventing data exfiltration at all times.

An attack from outside the organization occurs when an individual infiltrates a network to steal corporate data or user credentials. This is typically the result of a cybercriminal injecting malware into a device connected to a corporate network.

Some malware strands are designed to spread across an organization’s network and infiltrate others, seeking sensitive data in an attempt to extract. Other types of malware remain dormant on a network to avoid being detected by organizations’ security systems until data is subversively extracted or information is gradually collected over a period of time.

Attacks can result from malicious insiders stealing your organization’s data and sending documents to your personal email address. Typically the data is then sold to cyber criminals. They can also be caused by inattentive employee behavior that sees corporate data fall into the hands of bad actors.

Data Exfiltration Hacker with Phone

Types of Data Exfiltration

Data exfiltration occurs in various ways and through multiple attack methods, mostly on the Internet or on a corporate network.

The techniques cybercriminals use to extract data from organizations’ networks and systems are becoming increasingly sophisticated. These include: anonymous connections to servers, Domain Name System (DNS) attacks, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) tunneling, Direct Internet Protocol (IP) addresses, fileless attacks, and remote code execution.

Let’s see in detail some attack techniques to know what we are talking about specifically.

1. Social engineering and phishing attacks

Social engineering attacks and phishing attacks are popular network attack vectors. They are used to trick victims into downloading malware and entering their account credentials.

Phishing attacks consist of emails designed to appear legitimate and often appear to come from trusted senders. They usually contain an attachment that injects malware into the device. Other types contain a link to a website that appears legitimate but is forged to steal the login credentials entered. Some attackers even launch targeted phishing attacks to steal data from a specific user. Often the targets are the executives of a company or known individuals.

To defend against these types of attacks, it’s best to recognize them immediately and trash the emails. In a company it is possible to help the process through an ad hoc training course, based on data collected internally by the company through a controlled test. SOD also offers this service, if you are interested, you will find more information on the page of the service itself.

2. Outgoing email

Cybercriminals check e-mails to retrieve any data coming out of organizations’ e-mail systems. The recovered data can be calendars, databases, images and planning documents. These provide sensitive information of value or information that is useful for recovering valuable data.

3. Download to unsafe devices

This method of data exfiltration is a common form of accidental insider threat. The attacker accesses sensitive corporate information on his trusted device, then transfers the data to an insecure device. The insecure device could be an external drive or smartphone that is not protected by corporate security solutions or policies, which puts it at risk of data exfiltration.

Smartphones are also susceptible to data exfiltration. Android devices are vulnerable to the installation of malware that take control of the phone to download applications without the user’s consent.

4. Upload to external devices

This type of data exfiltration typically comes from bad guys. The internal attacker can extract data by downloading the information from a secure device, then uploading it to an external (insecure) device. This external device could be a laptop, smartphone, tablet or USB stick.

5. Human error and unsafe behavior on the network

The cloud provides users and businesses with a multitude of benefits, but together there are significant risks of data exfiltration. For example, when an authorized user accesses cloud services in an insecure way, it allows an attacker an access route from which he can retrieve data and take it off the secure network. Human error also plays a role in data mining, because appropriate protection may no longer be in place.

How to spot a data exfiltration attack

Depending on the type of attack method used, detecting data exfiltration can be a difficult task. Cybercriminals using more difficult-to-detect techniques can be mistaken for normal network traffic. This means that they can lurk in networks unnoticed for months and even years. Data exfiltration is often only discovered when the damage has already been caused.

To detect the presence of at-risk users, organizations must use tools that automatically discover malicious or unusual traffic in real time.

One tool with this capability is SOC (also offered as a service: SOCaaS) which implements an intrusion monitoring system, as well as an automatic system that verifies user behavior. When the SOC detects a possible threat, it sends an alert to the organization’s IT and security teams who can take action and investigate the situation.

SOC works by searching for and detecting anomalies that deviate from regular network activity. They then issue an alert or report so administrators and security teams can review the case.

In addition to detecting automatic threats, organizations can also construct the entire sequence of an event as it occurred, including mapping to a known kill chain or attack framework.

Using a SOCaaS, for a company that manages sensitive data, is an advantage from many points of view. Being offered as a service, the company will not have to invest in setting up a specialized IT department for its SOC, will not have to hire additional personnel and will be able to count on security systems that are always updated with qualified and always available operators.

For more information, do not hesitate to contact us.

Useful links:

Test your business with ethical phishing attacks

UEBA: Behavior Analysis Explained

 

Contact us

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • User Enumeration in IServ Schoolserver Web Login September 11, 2025
    Posted by naphthalin via Fulldisclosure on Sep 10“I know where your children go to school.” The web front end of the IServ school server from IServ GmbH allows user enumeration. Responses during failed login attempts differ, depending on if the user account exists, does not exist and other conditions. While this does not pose a […]
  • Re: Apple’s A17 Pro Chip: Critical Flaw Causes Dual Subsystem Failure & Forensic Log Loss September 11, 2025
    Posted by Matthew Fernandez on Sep 10Can you elaborate on why you consider this high severity? From the description, it sounds as if this behaviour is fail-closed. That is, the effects are limited to DoS, with security properties preserved.
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 92): more stupid blunders of Windows' File Explorer September 8, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08Hi @ll, this extends the two previous posts titled Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 90): "Digital Signature" property sheet missing without "Read Extended Attributes" access permission and Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 91): yet another 30 year old bug of the […]
  • Critical Security Report – Remote Code Execution via Persistent Discord WebRTC Automation September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08Reporter: [Taylor Christian Newsome / SleepRaps () gmail com] Date: [8/21/2025] Target: Discord WebRTC / Voice Gateway API Severity: Critical 1. Executive Summary A proof-of-concept (PersistentRTC) demonstrates remote code execution (RCE) capability against Discord users. The PoC enables Arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim’s browser context via WebRTC automation. […]
  • Submission of Critical Firmware Parameters – PCIe HCA Cards September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08*To:* support () mellanox com, networking-support () nvidia com *From:* Taylor Christian Newsome *Date:* August 20, 2025 *Dear Mellanox/NVIDIA Networking Support Team,* I am writing to formally submit the critical firmware parameters for Mellanox PCI Express Host Channel Adapter (HCA) cards, as detailed in the official documentation available here: […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250908-0 :: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up in KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) September 8, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250908-0 > ======================================================================= title: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up product: KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) vulnerable version: Current firmware/hardware as of Q2/2025 fixed version: No version numbers available CVE number:...
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in FFmpeg cache: Protocol (CacheEntry::size) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg cache: URL protocol implementation. The CacheEntry structure uses a 32-bit signed integer to store cache entry sizes (int size), but the cache layer can accumulate cached data exceeding 2 GB. Once entry->size grows beyond INT_MAX and new data is appended, an […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in DSCP Option Handling of FFmpeg UDP Protocol September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg UDP protocol implementation ( libavformat/udp.c) where the dscp parameter is parsed from a URI and left-shifted without bounds checking. Supplying a maximum 32-bit signed integer (2147483647) triggers undefined behavior due to a left shift that exceeds the representable range of int. This results […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in UDP Protocol Handler (fifo_size option) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A signed integer overflow exists in FFmpeg’s udp.c implementation when parsing the fifo_size option from a user-supplied UDP URL. The overflow occurs during multiplication, which is used to compute the size of the circular receive buffer. This can result in undefined behavior, allocation failures, or potentially memory corruption depending […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ LADSPA Filter Arbitrary Shared Object Loading via Unsanitized Environment Variables September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08The ladspa audio filter implementation (libavfilter/af_ladspa.c) in FFmpeg allows unsanitized environment variables to influence dynamic library loading. Specifically, the filter uses getenv("LADSPA_PATH") and getenv("HOME") when resolving the plugin shared object (.so) name provided through the file option. These values are concatenated into a filesystem path and passed directly into […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}