servizio di vulnerability assessment continuativo Piergiorgio Venuti

Protect your company with a continuous vulnerability assessment service: the perfect solution to integrate VA and PT

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Cybersecurity has become a fundamental pillar of modern businesses, and with the increase of threats and risks, it is imperative to adopt ever more advanced protection measures. In this context, the Vulnerability Assessment (VA) and the Penetration Test (PT) play a crucial role. However, it is also necessary to consider the importance of an ongoing vulnerability assessment service to guarantee complete and constant protection. In this article, we’ll dive into why ongoing VA service is imperative, in addition to performing regular VA and PT, and how Cyberfero service can improve corporate security.

1. Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Test: an overview

Before we look at the benefits of an ongoing vulnerability assessment service, it’s important to understand the differences between VAs and PTs.

1.1 Vulnerability Assessment (VA)

Vulnerability Assessment is a process that identifies and evaluates potential vulnerabilities in an organization’s computer systems, applications and networks. The main objective of the VA is to detect weaknesses and evaluate their impact on the overall security of the IT infrastructure. This process can be accomplished through various techniques, such as automated scanning, manual scanning and application testing.

1.2 Penetration Test (PT)

Penetration testing, on the other hand, is a more advanced and targeted approach, which involves carrying out simulated attacks against a system or application to evaluate its resistance to external threats. This process goes beyond simply discovering vulnerabilities, as it seeks to exploit them to gain access to the organization’s protected resources. In this way, the PT makes it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security measures and to identify any areas for improvement.

2. Why is ongoing VA service important?

While VA and PT are critical to ensuring cybersecurity, they may not be enough to address the ever-changing threat landscape. Here are some reasons why it is essential to adopt a continuous VA service:

2.1 Evolving threats

The cyber threat landscape is constantly changing, with new vulnerabilities emerging daily. A continuous VA service allows you to constantly monitor your IT infrastructure, identifying and evaluating new vulnerabilities as they are discovered. In this way, it is possible to protect the organization from emerging threats and ensure adequate cyber security.

2.2 Real-time monitoring

A continuous VA service provides real-time monitoring of vulnerabilities, allowing any weaknesses to be detected and corrected promptly. This proactive approach helps reduce your exposure time to threats and minimize the risk of cyberattacks.

2.3 Saving of time and resources

An ongoing VA service can help optimize resource allocation, allowing you to quickly identify critical areas and focus on the most urgent resolution actions. In addition, the ability to continuously monitor your IT infrastructure reduces the time required for periodic testing and helps identify vulnerabilities before an attack occurs.

3. Continuous Vulnerability Assessment systems

Continuous VA services can be implemented through various systems and technologies, which allow for constant and automated monitoring of the IT infrastructure. Among the main continuous VA systems, we find:

3.1 Automated Network Scanning

Automated network scanning is a technique that allows you to identify and analyze vulnerabilities in an organization’s network infrastructure. This process runs on an ongoing basis, providing an up-to-date view of the security status of your network and allowing you to quickly pinpoint any issues.

3.2 Web Application Monitoring

Web application monitoring is another key aspect of ongoing VA. This process consists in the constant analysis of web applications, to identify and evaluate potential vulnerabilities, such as configuration errors, code problems or weaknesses in application design.

3.3 Integration with vulnerability management systems

An ongoing VA service can be integrated with vulnerability management systems, which allow you to centralize and coordinate vulnerability detection and remediation activities. This approach allows you to effectively manage the VA process, constantly monitoring vulnerabilities and automatically activating the necessary resolution actions.

4. Cyberfero: the continuous VA service to increase company security

The continuous VA service offered by Cyberfero is designed to guarantee complete and constant protection of the corporate IT infrastructure. By integrating the continuous VA service with periodic VA and PT activities, it is possible to obtain an effective defense against cyber threats and maintain a high level of security.

Cyberfero offers a flexible and scalable approach that can be tailored to the specific needs of any organization. Among the main advantages of the continuous VA service of Cyberfero, we find:

  • Constant vulnerability monitoring, for up-to-date protection against emerging threats;
  • Reduce time exposed to threats by identifying and remediating vulnerabilities early;
  • Optimization of resources, thanks to the ability to focus on critical areas and solve problems quickly;
  • Integration with periodic VA and PT processes, for a complete and consistent IT security strategy.

5. Conclusion

In an increasingly connected and digitized world, cyber security has become a top priority for companies. Adopting a continuous vulnerability assessment service, in addition to carrying out regular VA and PT, is essential to ensure adequate and constant protection against cyber threats.

Cyberfero’s continuous VA service offers an excellent solution to increase corporate security, thanks to its ability to constantly monitor the IT infrastructure and integrate seamlessly with VA and PT activities. This comprehensive and proactive approach allows you to effectively address the ever-changing threat landscape and protect corporate assets.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Apache Struts2 Core Arbitrary Code Execution via OGNL Sandbox Escape November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below attempt to prevent arbitrary code execution via Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) through several different mechanisms but only in a cursory fashion -- the libraries only guard against immediate calls evaluated by the OGNL engine via `SecurityMemberAccess`, but an allowed […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core TokenHelper Token Cryptographic Timing Side-Channel November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Core 7.4.0 and below performs session token comparisons cryptographically insecure early-exit comparison functions (e.g., `!=`, `memcmp`, byte-by-byte loops with `break`) that return as soon as the first mismatched byte is encountered. The execution time of the comparison is therefore proportional to the number […]
  • Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin Uses a Previously Closed Resource November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin opens a Spring `ApplicationContex` via a try-with-resources block and, outside of said block, then continues to use the closed resource, resulting in an uncaught `IllegalStateException`. This particular issue prevents proper functionality and indicates poor code quality and code review standards and […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Integer Overflow November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below fails to properly prevent integer overflows, causing wrap-arounds and other issues on a downstream forced casting into types smaller than `BigInteger`. Importantly, this finding underscores why all applications using Struts and other such platforms should perform their own input […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Cross-Origin Protection Exemption Miskeyed to a Deployment-Wide Path November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below's `FetchMetadataInterceptor`, `CoepInterceptor`, and `CoopInterceptor` each compare their `exemptedPaths` configuration -- a per-interceptor-reference, administrator-supplied set of paths intended to exempt specific actions from the corresponding cross-origin protection -- against `HttpServletRequest.getContextPath()`. `getContextPath()` is fixed for the entire deployed web...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Fails to Properly Parse Chunked Requests November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's (version 7.4.0 and below) `ContentTypeInterceptor.intercept(ActionInvocation)` only deserialises a request body and enforces the `struts.rest.content.maxLength` bound when `HttpServletRequest#getContentLength()` returns a positive value. `getContentLength()` returns `-1` whenever the `Content-Length` header is absent, which normal and appropriate for any Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Untrimmed `Accept` Header Tokens Break Content Negation Fallback November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's `DefaultContentTypeHandlerManager.getHandlerForResponse(HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse)` splits the `Accept` header on commas and passes each resulting token directly to `findHandler(String)` without trimming leading or trailing whitespace. `findHandler(String)` only retries a trimmed lookup when a token contains a semicolon (`;`), so a token that merely carries […]
  • Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin Insecure Deserialisation -- Object Deserialisation Element-Count Limit Bypass November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01As of the current versions of the Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin (e.g., version 7.4.0 and the 7.5.0 snapshot dated 28 October 2026), attackers can bypass the element-count limit purported to protect Object deserialisation added to said code as part of the WW-5618 and S2-072 "hardening controls". Please […]
  • [0day-rubbish] NETGEAR RAX120 V1.2.5.18 authenticated SOAP InstallApp OS command injection to root-configured web-stack execution (6.8 Medium; conditionally 7.2 High with management exposure) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in NETGEAR RAX120 (Nighthawk AX12) firmware V1.2.5.18, the WiFi 6 consumer router from NETGEAR (United States), built on the Qualcomm IPQ8074 platform. The administrative web plane of this firmware generation is a lighttpd server fronting the vendor's DNI-framework CGI […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Raritan PX3 PDU G4 firmware 4.3.14 command injection in the ping and traceroute diagnostics through an inverted hostname-validation return check (8.8) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in the Raritan PX3 PDU G4, firmware version 4.3.14, the intelligent rack power distribution unit from Raritan, a Legrand company (United States). A low-privilege authenticated session converts one diagnostics request into operating-system command execution in the product's web-service context, […]

Customers