attacco ransomware Piergiorgio Venuti

Ransomware: a plague that brings companies and institutions to their knees. Should you pay the ransom? Here is the answer.

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

The devastating impact of ransomware on businesses

Ransomware has become one of the most damaging cyber threats to businesses in recent years. Cyber criminals target company networks, encrypt important files, and demand a ransom to provide the decryption key. The dilemma of whether or not to pay the ransom is something every affected company has to face.

According to the 2021 Clusit report, ransomware attacks in Italy grew 105% compared to 2020, confirming themselves as the leading type of malware. The consequences of these attacks can be devastating, with systems locked, operations interrupted, and data encrypted. 66% of affected companies declared the impact ranged from moderate to catastrophic.

Recovery times after a ransomware attack are long: 48% of companies took at least 3 days to return to normal, but in some cases the disruptions continued for weeks. This causes significant productivity losses and missed earnings.

Why companies choose to pay the ransom

Despite the risks, about 30% of affected companies opt to pay the ransom. The motivations are:

  • Quickly obtaining the keys to resume operations as soon as possible
  • Avoiding immediate reputational impact by promptly paying the demand
  • Lack of reliable backups to restore systems
  • Presence of insurance policies covering the ransom
  • Perception that it is the only way to regain access to data

Often companies are not aware of the risks associated with payment, namely:

  • Having no guarantee of obtaining decryption keys
  • Financing further attacks thus incentivizing criminals
  • Incurring other costs and impacts post-payment

Cost/benefit analysis: is it worth paying the ransom?

ransomware attack

Before making a decision it is important to thoroughly evaluate the costs and benefits of paying the ransom:

Potential benefits:

  • Speed of system recovery and business continuity
  • Lesser immediate reputational impact

Potential risks and costs:

  • No guarantee of obtaining working keys
  • Financing organized crime
  • Violation of international sanctions
  • Post-attack costs: forensic analysis, system restoration, communications
  • Legal impacts and regulatory compliance
  • Long-term reputational damages

Most analysts agree that the potential damages outweigh the actual benefits. Companies should invest more in ransomware prevention.

Increasing trend despite the risks

Despite these assessments, ransomware ransom payments are on the rise. In 2021 attackers globally earned about $603 million, of which $350 million in the United States alone.

This shows that a certain percentage of companies still prefer to pay, driven by the need to quickly restore operations. But experts agree that this strategy only risks further fueling the ransomware threat.

How widespread is ransom payment by geographic area?

The propensity of companies to pay ransom can vary significantly by geographic region:

  • North America: about 33%
  • United Kingdom: 46%
  • Germany: 15%
  • Nordic countries: 10%
  • Australia: 42%
  • India: 28%
  • Singapore: 19%
  • Brazil: 35%
  • Chile: 13%
  • Argentina: 19%

In some countries the authorities strongly discourage and deter any payment, influencing the choices of affected companies. Also the overall cyber maturity of a country can affect it.

Ransomware-as-a-Service: a growing criminal business

Much of the growth in ransomware attacks is due to the spread of Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models. Criminal groups develop and manage the malware and infrastructure, then rent access to affiliates for a percentage of the attacks’ proceeds.

RaaS has made ransomware attacks within reach of even less skilled criminals. This has led to a proliferation of the threat. Dismantling this model requires an international commitment by law enforcement and governments.

The importance of investing more in prevention

The best strategy for addressing the growing ransomware threat is to invest more heavily in prevention, detection, and incident response. Companies should:

  • Implement strong multi-layered security defenses
  • Perform regular complete backups and test their restoration
  • Adequately train staff on cybersecurity
  • Have tested incident response plans in place
  • Always keep entire software fleet updated
  • Closely monitor network for suspicious activity

Cyber insurance and actively collaborating with law enforcement in case of an attack are also advisable.

Government support against attacks

Government authorities and law enforcement are trying to counter the ransomware threat with initiatives on multiple fronts:

  • Awareness campaigns towards citizens and companies
  • Platforms for sharing threat intelligence
  • Specialized units dedicated to fighting cybercrime
  • International cooperation for joint investigations and operations
  • Sanctions against organizations and states supporting ransomware
  • Discouraging or banning ransom payments

However, efforts need to be intensified, given the global scale the phenomenon has taken on and the vast resources available to the attackers.

Conclusions: better prevent than pay

In summary, the best strategy for dealing with ransomware remains heavily investing in prevention, rather than indulging attacker demands by paying ransoms. A culture of cybersecurity, robust technological defenses, and active collaboration with authorities are the most effective tools to counter this evolving threat.

SOD (Secure Online Desktop) can provide various useful services to prevent the problem of ransomware attacks:

  • Backup and disaster recovery: SOD can offer managed data backup services, both on-premise and cloud-based, to guarantee system restoration in case of a ransomware attack.
  • Virtualized servers: The use of virtualized servers hosted by SOD makes it harder for ransomware to encrypt data, thanks to isolation between virtual machines.
  • Threat monitoring and detection: SOD can monitor client company networks and detect suspicious activity to identify potential ongoing ransomware attacks.
  • Sandboxing: Suspicious files can be analyzed in an isolated environment to detect ransomware payloads before they reach production systems.
  • Security awareness training: SOD can provide cybersecurity training courses to make employees more aware of ransomware risks.
  • Vulnerability assessment: Penetration testing and vulnerability assessment to identify and correct vulnerabilities in systems exploited by ransomware.
  • Advanced endpoint protection: Endpoint detection and response solutions suitable for preventing and detecting ransomware attacks on company computers and devices.

By collaborating with SOD, companies can improve their defenses against the growing ransomware threat.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • User Enumeration in IServ Schoolserver Web Login September 11, 2025
    Posted by naphthalin via Fulldisclosure on Sep 10“I know where your children go to school.” The web front end of the IServ school server from IServ GmbH allows user enumeration. Responses during failed login attempts differ, depending on if the user account exists, does not exist and other conditions. While this does not pose a […]
  • Re: Apple’s A17 Pro Chip: Critical Flaw Causes Dual Subsystem Failure & Forensic Log Loss September 11, 2025
    Posted by Matthew Fernandez on Sep 10Can you elaborate on why you consider this high severity? From the description, it sounds as if this behaviour is fail-closed. That is, the effects are limited to DoS, with security properties preserved.
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 92): more stupid blunders of Windows' File Explorer September 8, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08Hi @ll, this extends the two previous posts titled Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 90): "Digital Signature" property sheet missing without "Read Extended Attributes" access permission and Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 91): yet another 30 year old bug of the […]
  • Critical Security Report – Remote Code Execution via Persistent Discord WebRTC Automation September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08Reporter: [Taylor Christian Newsome / SleepRaps () gmail com] Date: [8/21/2025] Target: Discord WebRTC / Voice Gateway API Severity: Critical 1. Executive Summary A proof-of-concept (PersistentRTC) demonstrates remote code execution (RCE) capability against Discord users. The PoC enables Arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim’s browser context via WebRTC automation. […]
  • Submission of Critical Firmware Parameters – PCIe HCA Cards September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08*To:* support () mellanox com, networking-support () nvidia com *From:* Taylor Christian Newsome *Date:* August 20, 2025 *Dear Mellanox/NVIDIA Networking Support Team,* I am writing to formally submit the critical firmware parameters for Mellanox PCI Express Host Channel Adapter (HCA) cards, as detailed in the official documentation available here: […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250908-0 :: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up in KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) September 8, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250908-0 > ======================================================================= title: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up product: KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) vulnerable version: Current firmware/hardware as of Q2/2025 fixed version: No version numbers available CVE number:...
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in FFmpeg cache: Protocol (CacheEntry::size) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg cache: URL protocol implementation. The CacheEntry structure uses a 32-bit signed integer to store cache entry sizes (int size), but the cache layer can accumulate cached data exceeding 2 GB. Once entry->size grows beyond INT_MAX and new data is appended, an […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in DSCP Option Handling of FFmpeg UDP Protocol September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg UDP protocol implementation ( libavformat/udp.c) where the dscp parameter is parsed from a URI and left-shifted without bounds checking. Supplying a maximum 32-bit signed integer (2147483647) triggers undefined behavior due to a left shift that exceeds the representable range of int. This results […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in UDP Protocol Handler (fifo_size option) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A signed integer overflow exists in FFmpeg’s udp.c implementation when parsing the fifo_size option from a user-supplied UDP URL. The overflow occurs during multiplication, which is used to compute the size of the circular receive buffer. This can result in undefined behavior, allocation failures, or potentially memory corruption depending […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ LADSPA Filter Arbitrary Shared Object Loading via Unsanitized Environment Variables September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08The ladspa audio filter implementation (libavfilter/af_ladspa.c) in FFmpeg allows unsanitized environment variables to influence dynamic library loading. Specifically, the filter uses getenv("LADSPA_PATH") and getenv("HOME") when resolving the plugin shared object (.so) name provided through the file option. These values are concatenated into a filesystem path and passed directly into […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}