server cloud Piergiorgio Venuti

Server Cloud

server cloud

A cloud server or VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Server Cloud – Pros cons

Pros:

 

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Server Cloud – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Server Cloud – False myths:

  1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
  2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

Check out the Cloud Server

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

Alternative to the NAS

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Demo Cloud Servers

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

New templates for VPS

VPS

Docs

How to have your computer network under control

VPS Metered – Cloud location

ownCloud

Home

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20241204-0 :: Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities in Image Access Scan2Net (14 CVE) December 5, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Dec 04SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20241204-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities product: Image Access Scan2Net vulnerable version: Firmware
  • Microsoft Warbird and PMP security research - technical doc December 3, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on Dec 03Hello All, We have released a technical document pertaining to our Warbird / PMP security research. It is available for download from this location: https://security-explorations.com/materials/wbpmp_doc.md.txt The document provides a more in-depth technical explanation, illustration and verification of discovered attacks affecting PlayReady on Windows 10 / 11 x64 and pertaining […]
  • Access Control in Paxton Net2 software December 3, 2024
    Posted by Jeroen Hermans via Fulldisclosure on Dec 02CloudAware Security Advisory [CVE pending]: Potential PII leak and incorrect access control in Paxton Net2 software ======================================================================== Summary ======================================================================== Insecure backend database in the Paxton Net2 software. Possible leaking of PII incorrect access control. No physical access to computer running Paxton Net2 is required....
  • SEC Consult SA-20241127-0 :: Stored Cross-Site Scripting in Omada Identity (CVE-2024-52951) November 27, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Nov 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20241127-0 > ======================================================================= title: Stored Cross-Site Scripting product: Omada Identity vulnerable version:
  • SEC Consult SA-20241125-0 :: Unlocked JTAG interface and buffer overflow in Siemens SM-2558 Protocol Element, Siemens CP-2016 & CP-2019 November 27, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Nov 27SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20241125-0 > ======================================================================= title: Unlocked JTAG interface and buffer overflow product: Siemens SM-2558 Protocol Element (extension module for Siemens SICAM AK3/TM/BC), Siemens CP-2016 & CP-2019 vulnerable version: JTAG: Unknown HW revision, Zynq Firmware...
  • Re: Local Privilege Escalations in needrestart November 27, 2024
    Posted by Mark Esler on Nov 27The security fix for CVE-2024-48991, 6ce6136 (“core: prevent race condition on /proc/$PID/exec evaluation”) [0], introduced a regression which was subsequently fixed 42af5d3 ("core: fix regression of false positives for processes running in chroot or mountns (#317)") [1]. Many thanks to Ivan Kurnosov and Salvatore Bonaccorso for their review. [0] […]
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-5 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-5 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 macOS Sequoia 15.1.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121753. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: macOS Sequoia Impact: Processing maliciously crafted […]
  • Local Privilege Escalations in needrestart November 21, 2024
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21Qualys Security Advisory LPEs in needrestart (CVE-2024-48990, CVE-2024-48991, CVE-2024-48992, CVE-2024-10224, and CVE-2024-11003) ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Background CVE-2024-48990 (and CVE-2024-48992) CVE-2024-48991 CVE-2024-10224 (and CVE-2024-11003) Mitigation Acknowledgments Timeline I got bugs...
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-4 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-4 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 iOS 17.7.2 and iPadOS 17.7.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121754. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: iPhone XS […]
  • APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-3 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 November 21, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Nov 21APPLE-SA-11-19-2024-3 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 iOS 18.1.1 and iPadOS 18.1.1 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/121752. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. JavaScriptCore Available for: iPhone XS […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}