server cloud Piergiorgio Venuti

Server Cloud

server cloud

A cloud server or VPS (Virtual Private Server) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.


Server Cloud – Pros cons



   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.


   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Server Cloud – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Server Cloud – False myths:

  1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
  2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

Check out the Cloud Server

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

Alternative to the NAS

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Demo Cloud Servers

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

New templates for VPS



How to have your computer network under control

VPS Metered – Cloud location





More Articles…

Categories …


RSS darkreading

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Microsoft leak of PlayReady developer / Warbird libs June 21, 2024
    Posted by Security Explorations on Jun 21Hello All, On Jun 11, 2024 Microsoft engineer posted on a public forum information about a crash experienced with Apple TV service on a Surface Pro 9 device [1]. The post had an attachment - a 771MB file (4GB unpacked), which leaked internal code (260+ files [2]) pertaining to […]
  • Business Logic Flaw and Username Enumeration in spa-cartcmsv1.9.0.6 June 16, 2024
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 15# Exploit Title: Business Logic Flaw and Username Enumeration in spa-cartcmsv1.9.0.6 # Date: 6/2024 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: Description - It was found that the application suffers from business logic flaw - Additionally the application is vulnerable […]
  • APPLE-SA-06-10-2024-1 visionOS 1.2 June 12, 2024
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jun 11APPLE-SA-06-10-2024-1 visionOS 1.2 visionOS 1.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at Apple maintains a Security Releases page at which lists recent software updates with security advisories. CoreMedia Available for: Apple Vision Pro Impact: An app may be […]
  • CyberDanube Security Research 20240604-0 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in utnserver Pro/ProMAX/INU-100 June 9, 2024
    Posted by Thomas Weber via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09CyberDanube Security Research 20240604-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Multiple Vulnerabilities product| SEH utnserver Pro/ProMAX / INU-100 vulnerable version| 20.1.22 fixed version| 20.1.28 CVE number| CVE-2024-5420, CVE-2024-5421, CVE-2024-5422 impact| High homepage|
  • SEC Consult SA-20240606-0 :: Multiple critical vulnerabilities in Kiuwan SAST on-premise (KOP) & cloud/SaaS & Kiuwan Local Analyzer (KLA) June 9, 2024
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240606-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple critical vulnerabilities product: Kiuwan SAST on-premise (KOP) & cloud/SaaS Kiuwan Local Analyzer (KLA) vulnerable version: Kiuwan SAST
  • Blind SQL Injection - fengofficev3.11.1.2 June 9, 2024
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 09# Exploit Title: FengOffice - Blind SQL Injection # Date: 06/2024 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: # Tested on: Ubuntu 22.04 # Blog: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to application 2. Click on "Workspaces" 3. Copy full URL 4. Paste the HTTP GET request into […]
  • Trojan.Win32.DarkGateLoader (multi variants) / Arbitrary Code Execution June 9, 2024
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 09Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: Threat: Trojan.Win32.DarkGateLoader (multi variants) Vulnerability: Arbitrary Code Execution Description: Multiple variants of this malware look for and execute x32-bit "urlmon.dll" PE file in its current directory. Therefore, we can...
  • SQL Injection Vulnerability in Boelter Blue System Management (version 1.3) June 9, 2024
    Posted by InfoSec-DB via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09Exploit Title: SQL Injection Vulnerability in Boelter Blue System Management (version 1.3) Google Dork: inurl:"Powered by Boelter Blue" Date: 2024-06-04 Exploit Author: CBKB (DeadlyData, R4d1x) Vendor Homepage: Software Link: Version: 1.3 Tested on: Linux Debian 9 (stretch), Apache 2.4.25, MySQL >= 5.0.12 CVE:...
  • CyberDanube Security Research 20240528-0 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in ORing IAP-420 May 30, 2024
    Posted by Thomas Weber via Fulldisclosure on May 29CyberDanube Security Research 20240528-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Multiple Vulnerabilities product| ORing IAP-420 vulnerable version| 2.01e fixed version| - CVE number| CVE-2024-5410, CVE-2024-5411 impact| High homepage| found| 2024-01-19 by| T. Weber...
  • HNS-2024-06 - HN Security Advisory - Multiple vulnerabilities in Eclipse ThreadX May 30, 2024
    Posted by Marco Ivaldi on May 29Hi, Please find attached a security advisory that describes multiple vulnerabilities we discovered in Eclipse ThreadX (aka Azure RTOS). * Title: Multiple vulnerabilities in Eclipse ThreadX * OS: Eclipse ThreadX < 6.4.0 * Author: Marco Ivaldi * Date: 2024-05-28 * CVE IDs and severity: * CVE-2024-2214 - High - […]