Network Lateral Movement Piergiorgio Venuti

What is a Network Lateral Movement and how to defend yourself

During a cyber attack, hackers have only one goal in mind. This goal could be accessing a developer’s machine and stealing a project’s source code, analyzing emails from a particular executive, or extracting customer data from a server. All they have to do is log into the machine or system that contains the data they want, right? Not exactly. Actually, it’s a little more complicated than that. To achieve their goal, hackers are likely to break into a low-level web server, email account, or employee device, to name a few. From that node, they will move sideways (hence the name network lateral movement) to achieve their goal.

In fact, when attackers compromise a resource on a network, that device is almost never their final destination. In addition, the initial compromise rarely causes serious damage and may go unnoticed. Only if the security teams are able to detect a lateral movement before the attackers reach their intended goal, it is possible to prevent the data breach.

In this article, we will look at some of the more common types of network lateral movement and identify ways in which we can detect the attack and defend ourselves.

Understanding the network lateral movement

Lateral movement occurs when an attacker takes possession of a resource within a network and then extends its reach from that device to others within the same network. Let’s see it with an outline to help us understand better.

The perimeter of the infrastructure to be penetrated is represented with a horizontal line. The upper half represents what is outside the net, while what is below the line represents what is inside. In order for an attacker to enter the network, it must move vertically, ie from the outside to the inside (also called North-South traffic). But once a foothold has been established, it is possible to move sideways or horizontally, ie within the same network (called East-West traffic) to reach the final goal of the attack.

Lateral Movement - Schema

Possible path of a lateral movement. The arrow indicates the network nodes that are involved in the attack.

Approaches to the Lateral Movement

Overall, there are two common methods by which a hacker applies the lateral movement.

First approach: The attacker performs an internal scan to find out what other machines are on the network. In particular, it scans open ports that are listening and machines that suffer from vulnerabilities. At that point, the attacker can abuse these weaknesses to move sideways to another resource.

The second approach to the lateral movement exploits stolen credentials, and is the more common of the two. In this type of attack, the hacker could use an email phishing technique to infect a machine that interfaces with a particular server. Then he can use his login to recover passwords via a keylogger or other similar tools. At this point, he can use whatever credentials he was able to obtain to impersonate the user who was the victim of the phishing and log in to another machine. Once you have established access to that computer, you can repeat the tactic looking for additional credentials and / or privileges to exploit. In this way, the attacker can make their way and create remote connections to the target device.

In both cases it is difficult to identify the attack, because it does not occur through software or application malfunctions.

How to defend yourself

A lateral movement often manifests itself through anomalous network activity. For example, it is suspicious that a machine, which normally communicates with a few others, starts scanning the entire network. The same is true if that machine tries to connect to open ports, to interact with services and credentials with which it normally has no contact, or to use a username that has never been used before.

The list of alarm bells goes on and on. The key thing to understand is that a lateral movement involves machines doing something out of their routine, without proper authorization from IT.

This is what gives organizations the ability to detect this type of attack. Implementing log file monitoring is a first step in defense. Ideally, the data should be constantly analyzed for anomalies and possible breaches.

Defense issues

These defenses are not infallible. Security teams that simply rely on log files limit the scope of their defensive position, for example, due to log files collected only from particular applications. You might decide to monitor a certain service for credential theft, but attackers might not use that particular service to perform a lateral movement. This means that any malicious actions that do not use the monitored services will not be detected promptly.

In addition to this, hackers know the types of protocols that security personnel tend to monitor, making their task even more complex. Attackers can use this knowledge to model their attack campaigns in order to have a better chance of going unnoticed. It is one of the reasons why the MITER ATT & CK database was created to collect known techniques and raise the defenses.

The advantage of a SOCaaS

It is not enough for organizations to seek lateral movement using log files or an EDR tool. It is necessary to turn attention to the network as a whole. In this way it is possible to see all network traffic, establish a baseline of normal network activity for each user and device, and then monitor any unusual actions that could be indicative of attacks. It is known as anomaly detection, and is more comprehensive and often easier than examining each log file for out-of-the-ordinary events.

The problem with anomaly detection is that many of these irregularities are benign, and a lot of time is spent analyzing them. What is needed to separate harmful lateral movement from benign network anomalies is an understanding of the aspect of harmful behavior.

This is where a complete system that uses both behavioral analysis tools and professional security technicians comes into play.

The SOCaaS offered by SOD includes a Security Data Lake (SDL) for data collection and various tools for data analysis. One of these is the UEBA, particularly suitable for the detection of social threats, as it analyzes user behavior through AI using their actions as a source of data.

With these and other tools that make up the SOC, you can actively reduce the risk of attacks on your corporate data. If you are interested in learning more about SOD SOCaaS, I invite you to visit the dedicated page or contact us directly.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

SOCaaS

Is SOCaaS useful for your business

Computer Network Security: PT vs. VA

Cyber Security: Pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

 

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [NotCVE-2026-0001] Cloudflare Universal SSL CAA augmentation weakens RFC 8657 account binding — CVE-2026-14440 assigned 163 days after public no-CVE disclosure July 16, 2026
    Posted by NotCVE Advisories on Jul 15---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NotCVE Disclosure Update — NotCVE-2026-0001 / CVE-2026-14440 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [-] Summary: On 2026-01-19 the issue described below was published as NotCVE-2026-0001 after no CVE identifier was assigned for it. On 2026-07-01 — 163 days later — Cloudflare assigned CVE-2026-14440 to the same issue, now...
  • Subject: Advisory Submission: EZ Game Booster - Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Credentials (CWE-312) July 16, 2026
    Posted by AliReza on Jul 15# Exploit Title: EZ Game Booster v1.0.0 - Cleartext Credentials in user.config # Date: 2026-07-16 # Exploit Author: Alireza Chegini # Vendor Homepage: https://ezsystemrepairs.com # Software Link: https://ezsystemrepairs.com (Free version available) # Version: 1.0.0 (v2.0 exists but not tested - paid license required) # Tested on: Windows 10 / Windows […]
  • CVE-2026-56877 - Skillable SCORM userId authorisation bypass July 16, 2026
    Posted by Greg via Fulldisclosure on Jul 15Skillable's SCORM lab launch endpoint validates a launch token but enforces per-user allocation limits using a browser-supplied userId that is not bound to the validated token. An authenticated learner can modify this identifier to bypass configured limits, launch concurrent lab instances, and consume another learner's allocation. Skillable states […]
  • [REVIVE-SA-2026-003] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities July 9, 2026
    Posted by Matteo Beccati on Jul 08======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2026-003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2026-003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2026-06-25 Risk Level: Medium to High Applications affected: Revive Adserver Versions...
  • OPNsense XPATH Injection (CVE-2026-53582) July 7, 2026
    Posted by evan on Jul 06SUMMARY: a stored XPATH injection allows any user with just ca manager/certificate manager perms to leak any secret key/any value in config.xml, thus achieving privilege escalation and potentially remote code execution. this can also likely be chained via csrf and some clever hiding. see https://github.com/opnsense/core/security/advisories/GHSA-xww7-76m6-mh2r == VULN == the primary […]
  • SCHUTZWERK-SA-2025-001: Authentication Bypass for SafeLine SL6 and SL6+ July 7, 2026
    Posted by Jan Hüber via Fulldisclosure on Jul 06Authentication Bypass for SafeLine SL6 and SL6+ =============================================== The SafeLine SL6 and SL6+ devices integrated into elevator emergency intercom systems are vulnerable to an authentication bypass. This vulnerability allows attackers to bypass authentication requirements and access the device's configuration service via the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) interface. […]
  • Whistleblowersoftware.com: confidentiality and anonymity leakage to third parties July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02Whistleblowersoftware.com: confidentiality and anonymity leakage to third parties ## Summary The anonymous reporting flow on `whistleblowersoftware.com` encrypts report text end-to-end in the browser but does not extend the same guarantee to attachments and exposes the reporter's network identity and timing to a US-based third party. Together these […]
  • OpenBlow Multiple Deanonymization Vulnerabilities July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02OpenBlow Multiple Deanonymization Vulnerabilities Summary A production deployment was observed (HTTP archive of a full, real whistleblower submission) to route its anonymous reporting flow through Google. The intake CAPTCHA is Google reCAPTCHA, enforced as a mandatory, server-validated gate on report submission, and the UI additionally pulls a […]
  • Whistlelink: Site-access password exposed in web server access logs via GET query string July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02Whistlelink: Site-access password exposed in web server access logs via GET query string Severity: CRITICAL SUMMARY The Whistlelink reporting portal protects optionally-enabled, password-gated whistleblowing sites with a site-access password. When a visitor unlocks such a site, the client validates the password by issuing an HTTP GET request […]
  • APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-3 Safari 26.5.2 July 2, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-3 Safari 26.5.2 Safari 26.5.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/127685. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Web Extensions Available for: macOS Sonoma and macOS Sequoia Impact: A […]

Customers