XDR laptop Giacomo Lanzi

XDR as an approach to security

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Just like any other IT field, the cybersecurity market is driven by hype . Currently hype towards XDR, ie eXtended Detection and Response .

XDR is the latest in threat detection and response, a key element of a company’s infrastructure and data defense .

What exactly is XDR?

XDR is an alternative to traditional responsive approaches that only provide layer visibility on attacks . I refer to procedures such as detection and endpoint response (EDR), network traffic analysis (NTA) and SIEM , which we have talked about in many other articles.

The layer visibility implies that various services are adopted, stratified (layers), which each keep under control a specific entity in the infrastructure. This can be problematic. In fact, you need to make sure that layers don’t end up isolated, making it difficult, or nearly impossible to manage and view data. layer visibility provides important information, but can also lead to problems, including :

Collecting too many incomplete and contextless alerts. EDR detects only 26% of initial attack vectors and due to the high volume of security alerts, 54% of professionals security ignores warnings that should be investigated .
Complex and time-consuming investigations requiring specialist expertise . With EDR, the median time to identify a breach has increased to 197 days, and the median time to contain a breach has increased to 69 days.
Tools focused on technology rather than user or business . EDR focuses on technology gaps rather than the operational needs of users and companies. With more than 40 tools used in an average Security Operations Center (SOC), 23% of security teams spend their time maintaining and managing security tools rather than investigating . ( Source )

XDR data collection

For already overloaded security teams, the result can be an endless stream of events , too many tools and information to switch between, longer time frames for detection and security expenses that are beyond budget and are not even fully effective .

What’s new in eXtended Detection Response

XDR implements a proactive approach to threat detection and response . It offers visibility into data across networks, clouds and endpoints, while applying analytics and automation to address today’s increasingly sophisticated threats. The benefits of the XDR approach for security teams are manifold:

Identify hidden, stealth and sophisticated threats proactively and quickly.
Track threats across any source or location within your organization. < br> Increase the productivity of people working with technology.
Get more from their security investments .
Conclude investigations in a way more efficient .

From a business perspective, XDR enables companies to detect cyber threats and stop attacks, as well as simplify and strengthen security processes. As a result, it enables companies to better serve users and accelerate digital transformation initiatives. When users, data and applications are protected, companies can focus on strategic priorities.

Why consider it for your company

The two main reasons why this approach is beneficial are: endpoints do not have visibility into threats in places like cloud services , and it may not be possible to put a < em> software agent on all company endpoints .

But there are other reasons to consider too. The addition of other data sources can provide more context in the EDR results, improving triage and investigation of alerts . Providers are moving not only to provide more and better organized data, but also by delivering analytics platforms to lighten the analytical load on operators. This translates into ease of use and reduced operating costs.

XDR can seem very attractive as a product: Tight integration of parts, highly tuned content (as the provider has total control over the events from the data sources), use of analytics and response automation.

Virtual data XDR

What to pay attention to before adoption

Some providers are positioning their XDR as the ultimate threat detection solution . However, many vendors are unable to offer all the tools needed to get the advantage sold. Some providers offer endpoint and cloud monitoring in the package, others endpoint and network monitoring, but when looking at the comprehensive needs of most organizations, there are often missing details in the overall picture.

And if, once the company engages with a provider and notices a lack in one of the monitored sectors, what are the possible solutions? A situation of vendor lock-in from which to break free means to sever a contract and then open another one, with all the consequent costs.

XDR as an approach, not as a product

Before entering into a contract with a provider that sells a solution as final, it is always good to weigh the benefits and implications analytically.

Tight, two-way integration of multiple threat detection and response capabilities is the first distinguishing feature. But it is not necessary to buy two technology components from the same vendor to achieve good integration. Indeed, many products have the ability to integrate with some solutions from other vendors as one of their main strengths.

The XDR approach must provide a platform that allows the necessary data collection and storage , but also strong analytical skills, to orchestrate and automate response actions provided by the other parts of the solution. A cloud based Next Generation SIEM is a perfect solution.

How to move then?

The interest in XDR products is a clear signal that excessive fragmentation was leading to excessive complexity. A little consolidation is good, but it must be done while protecting flexibility and the ability to follow the best solutions.

In our opinion, a SOCaaS is an optimal solution. Provides next generation SIEM , with strong analytical capabilities. In addition, it also integrates artificial intelligence that helps in time to recognize threats through behavior analysis. A SOCaaS is the future of security operating platforms.

To find out with our services they can help you protect the data of your company and your customers, contact us, we will gladly answer all your questions.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Multi-Protocol Traceroute August 19, 2025
    Posted by Usman Saeed via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Adaptive Multi-Protocol Traceroute Author: Usman Saeed email: u () defzero net Website: www.defzero.net Description: This script is a TTL-based path mapper that reveals routes even when classic traceroute is filtered. The idea was that it would run in passes: first a conventional trace (ICMP […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250728-0 :: Stored Cross-Site-Scripting in Optimizely Episerver CMS August 19, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18Confidentiality class: Internal & Partner SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < publishing date 20250728-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities product: Optimizely Episerver Content Management System (EPiServer.CMS.Core) vulnerable version: Version 11.X:
  • SEC Consult SA-20250807-0 :: Race Condition in Shopware Voucher Submission August 19, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18Confidentiality class: Internal & Partner SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < publishing date 20250807-0 > ======================================================================= title: Race Condition in Shopware Voucher Submission product: Shopware 6 vulnerable version: v6.6.10.4 fixed version: No fixed version available yet CVE number: CVE-2025-7954 impact: medium...
  • Insufficient Resource Allocation Limits in nopCommerce v4.10 and v4.80.3 Excel Import Functionality August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce is vulnerable to Insufficient Resource Allocation Limits when handling large Excel file imports. Although the application provides a warning message recommending that users avoid importing more than 500–1,000 records at once due to memory constraints, the system does not enforce hard limits on file size, record count, or […]
  • CSV Injection in nopcommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce versions v4.10 and v4.80.3 are vulnerable to *C*SV Injection (Formula Injection) when exporting data to CSV. The application does not properly sanitize user-supplied input before including it in CSV export files. An attacker can inject malicious spreadsheet formulas into fields that will later be exported (for example, order […]
  • Insufficient Session Cookie Invalidation in nopCommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 is vulnerable to Insufficient Invalidation of Session Cookies. The application does not properly invalidate or expire authentication cookies after logout or session termination. An attacker who obtains a valid session cookie (e.g., via network interception, XSS, or system compromise) can continue to use the cookie […]
  • Session Fixation Vulnerability in iDempiere WebUI v 12.0.0.202508171158 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18The application does not issue a new session identifier (JSESSIONID) after successful authentication. An attacker who can set or predict a victim’s session ID prior to login may hijack the victim’s authenticated session once they log in, resulting in full account takeover. POST /webui HTTP/2 Host: Cookie: JSESSIONID=node01***.node0;
  • CSV Injection in iDempiere WebUI 12.0.0.202508171158 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18A CSV Injection vulnerability exists in iDempiere WebUI v12.0.0.202508171158. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before including it in exported CSV files. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious spreadsheet formulas (e.g., =cmd|&apos;/C notepad&apos;!A1) into fields that are later exported. When the CSV is opened in spreadsheet software […]
  • liblcf v0.8.1 liblcf/lcf2xml: Untrusted LCF data triggers uncaught std::length_error via negative vector resize (DoS) August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18lcf2xml (part of liblcf) aborts when parsing specially crafted RPG Maker 2000/2003 files that supply a negative element count for vectors of structured records. The generic reader: template void Struct::ReadLcf(std::vector& vec, LcfReader& stream) { int count = stream.ReadInt(); vec.resize(count); // huge size_t -> throws length_error for (int i = […]
  • liblcf v0.8.1 Integer Overflow in liblcf `ReadInt()` Leads to Out-of-Bounds Reads and Denial of Service August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18A crafted RPG Maker save file (`.lsd`) can trigger an integer overflow in liblcf’s lcfstrings compressed integer decoding logic (`LcfReader::ReadInt()`), resulting in an unbounded shift and accumulation loop. The overflowed value is later used in buffer size allocations and structure parsing, causing large memory access requests and parsing errors. […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}