Network Lateral Movement Giacomo Lanzi

What is a Network Lateral Movement and how to defend yourself

During a cyber attack, hackers have only one goal in mind. This goal could be accessing a developer’s machine and stealing a project’s source code, analyzing emails from a particular executive, or extracting customer data from a server. All they have to do is log into the machine or system that contains the data they want, right? Not exactly. Actually, it’s a little more complicated than that. To achieve their goal, hackers are likely to break into a low-level web server, email account, or employee device, to name a few. From that node, they will move sideways (hence the name network lateral movement) to achieve their goal.

In fact, when attackers compromise a resource on a network, that device is almost never their final destination. In addition, the initial compromise rarely causes serious damage and may go unnoticed. Only if the security teams are able to detect a lateral movement before the attackers reach their intended goal, it is possible to prevent the data breach.

In this article, we will look at some of the more common types of network lateral movement and identify ways in which we can detect the attack and defend ourselves.

Understanding the network lateral movement

Lateral movement occurs when an attacker takes possession of a resource within a network and then extends its reach from that device to others within the same network. Let’s see it with an outline to help us understand better.

The perimeter of the infrastructure to be penetrated is represented with a horizontal line. The upper half represents what is outside the net, while what is below the line represents what is inside. In order for an attacker to enter the network, it must move vertically, ie from the outside to the inside (also called North-South traffic). But once a foothold has been established, it is possible to move sideways or horizontally, ie within the same network (called East-West traffic) to reach the final goal of the attack.

Lateral Movement - Schema

Possible path of a lateral movement. The arrow indicates the network nodes that are involved in the attack.

Approaches to the Lateral Movement

Overall, there are two common methods by which a hacker applies the lateral movement.

First approach: The attacker performs an internal scan to find out what other machines are on the network. In particular, it scans open ports that are listening and machines that suffer from vulnerabilities. At that point, the attacker can abuse these weaknesses to move sideways to another resource.

The second approach to the lateral movement exploits stolen credentials, and is the more common of the two. In this type of attack, the hacker could use an email phishing technique to infect a machine that interfaces with a particular server. Then he can use his login to recover passwords via a keylogger or other similar tools. At this point, he can use whatever credentials he was able to obtain to impersonate the user who was the victim of the phishing and log in to another machine. Once you have established access to that computer, you can repeat the tactic looking for additional credentials and / or privileges to exploit. In this way, the attacker can make their way and create remote connections to the target device.

In both cases it is difficult to identify the attack, because it does not occur through software or application malfunctions.

How to defend yourself

A lateral movement often manifests itself through anomalous network activity. For example, it is suspicious that a machine, which normally communicates with a few others, starts scanning the entire network. The same is true if that machine tries to connect to open ports, to interact with services and credentials with which it normally has no contact, or to use a username that has never been used before.

The list of alarm bells goes on and on. The key thing to understand is that a lateral movement involves machines doing something out of their routine, without proper authorization from IT.

This is what gives organizations the ability to detect this type of attack. Implementing log file monitoring is a first step in defense. Ideally, the data should be constantly analyzed for anomalies and possible breaches.

Defense issues

These defenses are not infallible. Security teams that simply rely on log files limit the scope of their defensive position, for example, due to log files collected only from particular applications. You might decide to monitor a certain service for credential theft, but attackers might not use that particular service to perform a lateral movement. This means that any malicious actions that do not use the monitored services will not be detected promptly.

In addition to this, hackers know the types of protocols that security personnel tend to monitor, making their task even more complex. Attackers can use this knowledge to model their attack campaigns in order to have a better chance of going unnoticed. It is one of the reasons why the MITER ATT & CK database was created to collect known techniques and raise the defenses.

The advantage of a SOCaaS

It is not enough for organizations to seek lateral movement using log files or an EDR tool. It is necessary to turn attention to the network as a whole. In this way it is possible to see all network traffic, establish a baseline of normal network activity for each user and device, and then monitor any unusual actions that could be indicative of attacks. It is known as anomaly detection, and is more comprehensive and often easier than examining each log file for out-of-the-ordinary events.

The problem with anomaly detection is that many of these irregularities are benign, and a lot of time is spent analyzing them. What is needed to separate harmful lateral movement from benign network anomalies is an understanding of the aspect of harmful behavior.

This is where a complete system that uses both behavioral analysis tools and professional security technicians comes into play.

The SOCaaS offered by SOD includes a Security Data Lake (SDL) for data collection and various tools for data analysis. One of these is the UEBA, particularly suitable for the detection of social threats, as it analyzes user behavior through AI using their actions as a source of data.

With these and other tools that make up the SOC, you can actively reduce the risk of attacks on your corporate data. If you are interested in learning more about SOD SOCaaS, I invite you to visit the dedicated page or contact us directly.

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

SOCaaS

Is SOCaaS useful for your business

Computer Network Security: PT vs. VA

Cyber Security: Pentest and verification of vulnerabilities

 

 

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20250604-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation and Default Credentials in INDAMED - MEDICAL OFFICE (Medical practice management) Demo version June 10, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250604-0 > ======================================================================= title: Local Privilege Escalation and Default Credentials product: INDAMED - MEDICAL OFFICE (Medical practice management) Demo version vulnerable version: Revision 18544 (II/2024) fixed version: Q2/2025 (Privilege Escalation, Default Password)...
  • Full Disclosure: CVE-2025-31200 & CVE-2025-31201 – 0-Click iMessage Chain → Secure Enclave Key Theft, Wormable RCE, Crypto Theft June 10, 2025
    Posted by josephgoyd via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09Hello Full Disclosure, This is a strategic public disclosure of a zero-click iMessage exploit chain that was discovered live on iOS 18.2 and remained unpatched through iOS 18.4. It enabled Secure Enclave key theft, wormable remote code execution, and undetectable crypto wallet exfiltration. Despite responsible disclosure, the research […]
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 89): user group policies don't deserve tamper protection June 3, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Jun 03Hi @ll, user group policies are stored in DACL-protected registry keys [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies] respectively [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies] and below, where only the SYSTEM account and members of the "Administrators" user group are granted write access. At logon the user&apos;s registry hive "%USERPROFILE%\ntuser.dat" is loaded with exclusive (read, write and...
  • CVE-2025-45542: Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in CloudClassroom PHP Project v1.0 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Sanjay Singh on Jun 03Hello Full Disclosure list, I am sharing details of a newly assigned CVE affecting an open-source educational software project: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVE-2025-45542: Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in CloudClassroom PHP Project v1.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Product: CloudClassroom PHP Project Vendor:...
  • ERPNext v15.53.1 Stored XSS in bio Field Allows Arbitrary Script Execution in Profile Page June 3, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Jun 03An authenticated attacker can inject JavaScript into the bio field of their user profile. When the profile is viewed by another user, the injected script executes. *Proof of Concept:* POST /api/method/frappe.desk.page.user_profile.user_profile.update_profile_info HTTP/2 Host: --host-- profile_info={"bio":"\">"}
  • ERPNext v15.53.1 Stored XSS in user_image Field Allows Script Execution via Injected Image Path June 3, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Jun 03An authenticated user can inject malicious JavaScript into the user_image field of the profile page using an XSS payload within the file path or HTML context. This field is rendered without sufficient sanitization, allowing stored script execution in the context of other authenticated users. *Proof of Concept:*POST /api/method/frappe.desk.page.user_profile.user_profile.update_profile_info HTTP/2 […]
  • Local information disclosure in apport and systemd-coredump June 3, 2025
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Jun 03Qualys Security Advisory Local information disclosure in apport and systemd-coredump (CVE-2025-5054 and CVE-2025-4598) ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Mitigation Local information disclosure in apport (CVE-2025-5054) - Background - Analysis - Proof of concept Local information disclosure in systemd-coredump...
  • Stored XSS via File Upload - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: Stored XSS via File Upload - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ Stored XSS via File Upload #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login with low privilege user and visit "Profile" > "Edit […]
  • IDOR "Change Password" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: IDOR "Change Password" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ IDOR "Change Password" Functionality #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login as user with low privilege and visit profile page 2. Select […]
  • Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login as normal user and visit "Profile" > "Message" > […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}