Alessandro Stesi
Corporate backup solutions Self-protection tests
Introduction
Corporate backup solutions: In light of the growing number of ransomware attacks in which cryptolockers stop database processes to unlock database files for encryption (Cerber, GlobeImposter, Rapid, Serpent) and they can encrypt local and network backups to request a ransom payment (Rapid, Spora), we decided to test the self-protection capabilities of the best backup solutions used in the corporate environments available for testing.
The test aims to check the sustainability of the processes and services of the products against the typical attacks on the security software described below, as well as the self-protection of the local backup and of the product files. Ransomware can encrypt configuration files and local backup files that belong to a backup program by disabling file recovery. In addition, once access to the agent or server processes is obtained, the attacker can delete backup copies of files not only locally, but also in the cloud on behalf of a backup solution.
This document is a summary of the enterprise backup solutions test report and includes a description of the test environment, a list of tested solutions and their versions, an overview of test scenarios, as well as results and conclusions based on these results. We do not classify the tested solutions and do not award any prize, but we provide the results “as is” for informational purposes only.
Testing environment
The tests were conducted on the virtual machines of:
– Windows 8.1 SP1 32 bit build 9600
– Windows 10 Enterprise 64 bit Build 16299
– Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard 64 bit v. 6.3.9600 Build 9600
We have tested backup solutions on platforms
32 and 64 bit because the process injection techniques used in the test scenarios differ on these platforms. In addition, 32 and 64 bit product builds may contain a different set of features, including self-protection, and their implementation may depend on the architecture of the operating system.
Tested products
Corporate backup solutions: The most recent versions of the following products available at the time of testing were tested:
|
Product name |
Components |
Version |
|
Management Server Agent |
12.5 9010 12.5 9010 |
|
|
Unified Data Protection Server Unified Data Protection Client |
6.5.4175 Aggiornamento 2 Build 667 6.5.4175.791 v.r6.5 |
|
|
Backup & Replication Agent for Microsoft Windows |
9.5 Aggiornamento 3 2.1.0.423 |
|
|
Veritas Backup Exec |
Server Agent Utility pour Windows |
16.0 Rev. 1142 16.0 Rev. 1142-1632
|
Each product was installed with the default settings and updated before running the test.
Corporate backup solutions – Test scenarios
The test suite includes 31 tests that simulate attacks on local backup files, product files, processes, services and cloud storage that aim to block the backup and restore service. The “Product File Protection” test category contains simple tests aimed at destroying backup and application files making it impossible to recover data encrypted by ransomware.
The second group of tests “Protection of processes and products services” is essential for self-protection since the malware can inject the malicious code into a backup agent and act on behalf of a backup solution obtaining all the necessary privileges to check the backup files. At the behest of an attacker, a malicious process can interrupt processes and services with consequent blocking of the backup and restore application
or deleting backup files on behalf of a backup solution. The latest series of tests is “Cloud backup and recovery protection” and is addressed to communication interfaces with cloud storage. The attack of DNS poisoning or the improper use of the CLI can cause the cloud backup service to be interrupted.
Corporate backup solutions – Conclusions
The purpose of the test was to verify the backup software’s self-protection capabilities to protect related files, processes, services and cloud storage from scenarios that can potentially be run by ransomware.
The results showed that most of the tested products are not ready in many cases to counter ransomware-type attacks by allowing a potential attacker to block user backups and disable backup and restore services. Only Acronis Backup has shown good results with an 87% and 81% effectiveness rate for 32-bit and 64-bit products, similarly providing complete self-protection and service sustainability features.
Download the complete department here: Nio Guard Independent Study_IT
[btnsx id=”2931″]
Related articles:
Modern Data Protection: The Difference is in the Cloud
BaaS | Cloud Backup | Backup as a Service
[Name change] Acronis Data Cloud –> Acronis Cyber Cloud
Stay in control of your fast-moving, quick-shifting data
A Hybrid Cloud Backup Solution for System Integrator and reseller
Share
RSS
More Articles…
- From Secure Online Desktop to Cyberfero: rebranding of the leading cybersecurity company
- NIS: what it is and how it protects cybersecurity
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network
- Ransomware: a plague that brings companies and institutions to their knees. Should you pay the ransom? Here is the answer.
- Why IT audit and log management are important for Cybersecurity
- Red Team, Blue Team and Purple Team: what are the differences?
Categories …
- Backup as a Service (18)
- Acronis Cloud Backup (11)
- Veeam Cloud Connect (4)
- Cloud Conference (3)
- Cloud CRM (1)
- Cloud Server/VPS (22)
- Conferenza Cloud (4)
- Cyberfero (15)
- ICT Monitoring (5)
- Log Management (2)
- News (25)
- ownCloud (4)
- Privacy (7)
- Security (203)
- Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) (8)
- Deception (4)
- Ethical Phishing (11)
- Netwrix Auditor (2)
- Penetration Test (11)
- Posture Guard (3)
- SOCaaS (65)
- Vulnerabilities (84)
- Web Hosting (15)
Tags
darkreading
- DPRK's APT37 Targets Cambodia With Khmer, 'VeilShell' Backdoor October 4, 2024It's North Korea versus Cambodia, with Windows default settings and sheer patience allowing the bad guys to avoid easy detection.
- Thousands of DrayTek Routers at Risk From 14 Vulnerabilities October 3, 2024Several of the flaws enable remote code execution and denial-of-service attacks while others enable data theft, session hijacking, and other malicious activity.
- CISA Adds High-Severity Ivanti Vulnerability to KEV Catalog October 3, 2024Ivanti reports that the bug is being actively exploited in the wild for select customers.
- Ukraine-Russia Cyber Battles Tip Over Into the Real World October 3, 2024"Pig butchering," generative AI, and spear-phishing have all transformed digital warfare.
- The Future of AI Safety: California's Vetoed Bill & What Comes Next October 3, 2024Although the veto was a setback, it highlights key debates in the emerging field of AI governance and the potential for California to shape the future of AI regulation.
- Navigating the Complexities & Security Risks of Multicloud Management October 3, 2024Businesses that successfully manage the complexities of multicloud management will be best positioned to thrive in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.
- What Communications Companies Need to Know Before Q-Day October 3, 2024NIST standardized three algorithms for post-quantum cryptography. What does that mean for the information and communications technology (ICT) industry?
- AI 'Nude Photo Generator' Delivers Infostealers Instead of Images October 3, 2024The FIN7 group is mounting a sophisticated malware campaign that spans numerous websites, to lure people with a deepfake tool promising to create nudes out of photos.
- China-Backed APT Group Culling Thai Government Data October 3, 2024CeranaKeeper is bombarding Southeast Asia with data exfiltration attacks via file-sharing services such as Pastebin, OneDrive, and GitHub, researchers say.
- Near-'perfctl' Fileless Malware Targets Millions of Linux Servers October 3, 2024Armed with a staggering arsenal of at least 20,000 different exploits for various Linux server misconfigurations, perfctl is everywhere, annoying, and tough to get rid of.
Full Disclosure
- Some SIM / USIM card security (and ecosystem) info October 4, 2024Posted by Security Explorations on Oct 04Hello All, Those interested in SIM / USIM card security might find some information at our spin-off project page dedicated to the topic potentially useful: https://security-explorations.com/sim-usim-cards.html We share there some information based on the experiences gained in the SIM / USIM card security space, all in a hope this […]
- SEC Consult SA-20240930-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation via MSI Installer in Nitro PDF Pro (CVE-2024-35288) October 1, 2024Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 30>
- Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a / Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Benju.a Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Family: Benju Type: PE32 MD5: 88922242e8805bfbc5981e55fdfadd71 SHA256: 7d34804173e09d0f378dfc8c9212fe77ff51f08c9d0b73d00a19b7045ddc1f0e Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0700...
- Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/277f9a4db328476300c4da5f680902ea.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Prorat.jz Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The RAT listens on TCP ports 51100,5112,5110 and runs an FTP service. Prorat uses a vulnerable component in a secondary malware […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a / Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) September 29, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Amatu.a Vulnerability: Remote Arbitrary File Write (RCE) Family: Amatu Type: PE32 MD5: 1e2d0b90ffc23e00b743c41064bdcc6b SHA256: 77fff9931013ab4de6d4be66ca4fda47be37b6f706a7062430ee8133c7521297 Vuln ID: MVID-2024-0698 Dropped...
- Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw / Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) September 29, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/68dd7df213674e096d6ee255a7b90088.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Agent.pw Vulnerability: Remote Stack Buffer Overflow (SEH) Description: The malware listens on TCP port 21111. Third-party attackers who can reach an infected machine can send specially crafted sequential packetz […]
- Backdoor.Win32.Boiling / Remote Command Execution September 29, 2024Posted by malvuln on Sep 28Discovery / credits: Malvuln (John Page aka hyp3rlinx) (c) 2024 Original source: https://malvuln.com/advisory/80cb490e5d3c4205434850eff6ef5f8f.txt Contact: malvuln13 () gmail com Media: x.com/malvuln Threat: Backdoor.Win32.Boiling Vulnerability: Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution Description: The malware listens on TCP port 4369. Third party adversaries who can reach an infected host, can issue single OS commands to […]
- Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 88): a SINGLE command line shows about 20, 000 instances of CWE-73 September 29, 2024Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Sep 28Hi @ll, CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path is a well-known and well-documented weakness. as well as demonstrate how to (ab)use just one instance of this weakness (introduced about 7 years ago with Microsoft Defender, so-called "security software") due to...
- SEC Consult SA-20240925-0 :: Uninstall Password Bypass in BlackBerry CylanceOPTICS Windows Installer Package (CVE-2024-35214) September 29, 2024Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 28SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20240925-0 > ======================================================================= title: Uninstall Password Bypass product: BlackBerry CylanceOPTICS Windows Installer Package vulnerable version: CylanceOPTICS
- Apple iOS 17.2.1 - Screen Time Passcode Retrieval (Mitigation Bypass) September 29, 2024Posted by Patrick via Fulldisclosure on Sep 28Document Title: =============== Apple iOS 17.2.1 - Screen Time Passcode Retrieval (Mitigation Bypass) Release Date: ============= 2024-09-24 Affected Product(s): ==================== Vendor: Apple Inc. Product: Apple iOS 17.2.1 (possibly all < 18.0 excluding 18.0) References: ==================== VIDEO PoC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVvk9TR7qMo The vulnerability has been patched in the latest release of […]
Customers
Twitter FEED
Recent activity
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes L'impatto crescente delle minacce informatiche, su sistemi operativi privati op… https://t.co/FimxTS4o9G
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The growing impact of cyber threats, on private or corporate operating systems… https://t.co/y6G6RYA9n1
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Tempo di lettura stimato: 6 minuti Today we are talking about the CTI update of our services. Data security is… https://t.co/YAZkn7iFqa
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes Il tema della sicurezza delle informazioni è di grande attualità in questo peri… https://t.co/tfve5Kzr09
-
SecureOnlineDesktop
Estimated reading time: 6 minutes The issue of information security is very topical in this historical period ch… https://t.co/TP8gvdRcrF
Newsletter
{subscription_form_1}Products and Solutions
Partners
Cloud Models
News
- From Secure Online Desktop to Cyberfero: rebranding of the leading cybersecurity company May 6, 2024
- NIS: what it is and how it protects cybersecurity April 22, 2024
- Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself April 17, 2024
- Penetration Testing and MFA: A Dual Strategy to Maximize Security April 15, 2024
- Penetration Testing: Where to Strike to Protect Your IT Network March 25, 2024
Google Reviews
Ottima azienda, servizi molto utili, staff qualificato e competente. Raccomandata!read more
Ottimo supportoread more
E' un piacere poter collaborare con realtà di questo tiporead more
Un ottimo fornitore.
Io personalmente ho parlato con l' Ing. Venuti, valore aggiunto indubbiamente.read more
About
© 2024 Cyberfero s.r.l. All Rights Reserved. Sede Legale: via Statuto 3 - 42121 Reggio Emilia (RE) – PEC [email protected] Cod. fiscale e P.IVA 03058120357 – R.E.A. 356650 Informativa Privacy - Certificazioni ISO