deception vs edr Piergiorgio Venuti

Deception vs EDR: What’s the Best Threat Defense Strategy?

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Introduction

Cybersecurity is a daily challenge for businesses, with threats constantly evolving. Two approaches that are emerging to strengthen your security posture are Deception technology and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools. But what are the differences and advantages of each? This article compares Deception and EDR to help choose the best strategy.

What is Deception Technology?

Deception technology uses deceptive security traps to identify and fool attackers. Dummy assets such as fake endpoints, documents, credentials, and network traffic are created to confuse hackers and divert them from valuable resources.

Key benefits include:

  • Early detection of threats – traps attract attackers and generate alerts as soon as there is an intrusion.
  • Active deception – confuse and slow down hackers by redirecting them to fake assets.
  • Fewer false positives – only unauthorized access triggers alerts.
  • Threat intelligence – gain valuable insight into attacker tactics and techniques.

Deception solutions are effective against a wide range of internal and external threats.

What is Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)?

EDR tools are focused on detecting and responding to endpoint threats. They use agents installed on laptops, servers, IoT devices and other endpoints to monitor suspicious events and activities.

The main advantages include:

  • Endpoint visibility – EDR agents provide real-time telemetry about processes, network connections, and anomalous behavior.
  • Advanced detection – behavioral analysis, machine learning and signatures to detect attacks never seen before.
  • Responsiveness – EDR tools allow you to contain threats, isolate compromised devices and initiate remediation actions.
  • Threat hunting – ability to search for threats at scale across all endpoints.

EDRs are effective against malware, targeted attacks, and insider threats.

Comparison between Deception and EDR

While both technologies aim to strengthen security, they have complementary approaches with different strengths:

DeceptionEDR
Deceptive traps activePassive monitoring of endpoints
Early intrusion detectionVisibility into suspicious activity
Identify the attackers’ tacticsThreat blocking and containment
Few false positivesDetection of unknown malware
Effective against external threatsEffective against malware and internal intrusions

In summary, Deception technology focuses on deception and initial intrusion detection, while EDR provides visibility, detection and responsiveness on endpoints.

How Deception and EDR work

Let’s dive into the specific actions Deception technology and EDR tools take to counter threats:

Deception Actions:

  • It generates fake data such as documents, credentials and network traffic to attract hackers
  • Create fake endpoints and servers to confuse attackers
  • Isolate and analyze malware targeting deceptive traps
  • Provides instant alerts as soon as fake credentials are used or traps are triggered
  • Track attackers’ lateral movement across the network with false hop points
  • Acquire threat intelligence about adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures

EDR actions:

  • Agents monitor filesystems, processes, network connections, and logs on each endpoint in real time
  • Detect exploits, lateral movement, and threat persistence techniques
  • Use machine learning to identify anomalous activities and processes
  • Automatically block and isolate compromised devices
  • Fornisce capacità di threat hunting per cercare proattivamente le intrusioni
  • It allows you to analyze and contain an attack in progress
  • Generate incident alerts and automate security responses

In summary, Deception lures and tricks attackers, while EDR detects and blocks infiltrating threats.

Conclusion

Deception technology and EDR tools are both invaluable in strengthening the security of organizations against today’s threats.

Deception provides early intrusion detection and the advantage of active deception, while EDR provides endpoint-level visibility, detection, and response capabilities. By integrating them together, you get unmatched active “on and off” network defense protection.

In fact, by combining Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Deception service with their SOCaaS EDR solutions, you can cover the corporate perimeter and critical endpoints with deceptive traps and real-time threat detection.

This multi-layered approach to active cyber defense helps identify and stop attacks in their early stages, dramatically reducing the risk of security breaches.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • SEC Consult SA-20250604-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation and Default Credentials in INDAMED - MEDICAL OFFICE (Medical practice management) Demo version June 10, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250604-0 > ======================================================================= title: Local Privilege Escalation and Default Credentials product: INDAMED - MEDICAL OFFICE (Medical practice management) Demo version vulnerable version: Revision 18544 (II/2024) fixed version: Q2/2025 (Privilege Escalation, Default Password)...
  • Full Disclosure: CVE-2025-31200 & CVE-2025-31201 – 0-Click iMessage Chain → Secure Enclave Key Theft, Wormable RCE, Crypto Theft June 10, 2025
    Posted by josephgoyd via Fulldisclosure on Jun 09Hello Full Disclosure, This is a strategic public disclosure of a zero-click iMessage exploit chain that was discovered live on iOS 18.2 and remained unpatched through iOS 18.4. It enabled Secure Enclave key theft, wormable remote code execution, and undetectable crypto wallet exfiltration. Despite responsible disclosure, the research […]
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 89): user group policies don't deserve tamper protection June 3, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak on Jun 03Hi @ll, user group policies are stored in DACL-protected registry keys [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies] respectively [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies] and below, where only the SYSTEM account and members of the "Administrators" user group are granted write access. At logon the user&apos;s registry hive "%USERPROFILE%\ntuser.dat" is loaded with exclusive (read, write and...
  • CVE-2025-45542: Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in CloudClassroom PHP Project v1.0 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Sanjay Singh on Jun 03Hello Full Disclosure list, I am sharing details of a newly assigned CVE affecting an open-source educational software project: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CVE-2025-45542: Time-Based Blind SQL Injection in CloudClassroom PHP Project v1.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Product: CloudClassroom PHP Project Vendor:...
  • ERPNext v15.53.1 Stored XSS in bio Field Allows Arbitrary Script Execution in Profile Page June 3, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Jun 03An authenticated attacker can inject JavaScript into the bio field of their user profile. When the profile is viewed by another user, the injected script executes. *Proof of Concept:* POST /api/method/frappe.desk.page.user_profile.user_profile.update_profile_info HTTP/2 Host: --host-- profile_info={"bio":"\">"}
  • ERPNext v15.53.1 Stored XSS in user_image Field Allows Script Execution via Injected Image Path June 3, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Jun 03An authenticated user can inject malicious JavaScript into the user_image field of the profile page using an XSS payload within the file path or HTML context. This field is rendered without sufficient sanitization, allowing stored script execution in the context of other authenticated users. *Proof of Concept:*POST /api/method/frappe.desk.page.user_profile.user_profile.update_profile_info HTTP/2 […]
  • Local information disclosure in apport and systemd-coredump June 3, 2025
    Posted by Qualys Security Advisory via Fulldisclosure on Jun 03Qualys Security Advisory Local information disclosure in apport and systemd-coredump (CVE-2025-5054 and CVE-2025-4598) ======================================================================== Contents ======================================================================== Summary Mitigation Local information disclosure in apport (CVE-2025-5054) - Background - Analysis - Proof of concept Local information disclosure in systemd-coredump...
  • Stored XSS via File Upload - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: Stored XSS via File Upload - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ Stored XSS via File Upload #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login with low privilege user and visit "Profile" > "Edit […]
  • IDOR "Change Password" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: IDOR "Change Password" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ IDOR "Change Password" Functionality #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login as user with low privilege and visit profile page 2. Select […]
  • Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 June 3, 2025
    Posted by Andrey Stoykov on Jun 03# Exploit Title: Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality - adaptcmsv3.0.3 # Date: 06/2025 # Exploit Author: Andrey Stoykov # Version: 3.0.3 # Tested on: Debian 12 # Blog: https://msecureltd.blogspot.com/ Stored XSS "Send Message" Functionality #1: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login as normal user and visit "Profile" > "Message" > […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}