deception vs edr Piergiorgio Venuti

Deception vs EDR: What’s the Best Threat Defense Strategy?

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Introduction

Cybersecurity is a daily challenge for businesses, with threats constantly evolving. Two approaches that are emerging to strengthen your security posture are Deception technology and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools. But what are the differences and advantages of each? This article compares Deception and EDR to help choose the best strategy.

What is Deception Technology?

Deception technology uses deceptive security traps to identify and fool attackers. Dummy assets such as fake endpoints, documents, credentials, and network traffic are created to confuse hackers and divert them from valuable resources.

Key benefits include:

  • Early detection of threats – traps attract attackers and generate alerts as soon as there is an intrusion.
  • Active deception – confuse and slow down hackers by redirecting them to fake assets.
  • Fewer false positives – only unauthorized access triggers alerts.
  • Threat intelligence – gain valuable insight into attacker tactics and techniques.

Deception solutions are effective against a wide range of internal and external threats.

What is Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)?

EDR tools are focused on detecting and responding to endpoint threats. They use agents installed on laptops, servers, IoT devices and other endpoints to monitor suspicious events and activities.

The main advantages include:

  • Endpoint visibility – EDR agents provide real-time telemetry about processes, network connections, and anomalous behavior.
  • Advanced detection – behavioral analysis, machine learning and signatures to detect attacks never seen before.
  • Responsiveness – EDR tools allow you to contain threats, isolate compromised devices and initiate remediation actions.
  • Threat hunting – ability to search for threats at scale across all endpoints.

EDRs are effective against malware, targeted attacks, and insider threats.

Comparison between Deception and EDR

While both technologies aim to strengthen security, they have complementary approaches with different strengths:

DeceptionEDR
Deceptive traps activePassive monitoring of endpoints
Early intrusion detectionVisibility into suspicious activity
Identify the attackers’ tacticsThreat blocking and containment
Few false positivesDetection of unknown malware
Effective against external threatsEffective against malware and internal intrusions

In summary, Deception technology focuses on deception and initial intrusion detection, while EDR provides visibility, detection and responsiveness on endpoints.

How Deception and EDR work

Let’s dive into the specific actions Deception technology and EDR tools take to counter threats:

Deception Actions:

  • It generates fake data such as documents, credentials and network traffic to attract hackers
  • Create fake endpoints and servers to confuse attackers
  • Isolate and analyze malware targeting deceptive traps
  • Provides instant alerts as soon as fake credentials are used or traps are triggered
  • Track attackers’ lateral movement across the network with false hop points
  • Acquire threat intelligence about adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures

EDR actions:

  • Agents monitor filesystems, processes, network connections, and logs on each endpoint in real time
  • Detect exploits, lateral movement, and threat persistence techniques
  • Use machine learning to identify anomalous activities and processes
  • Automatically block and isolate compromised devices
  • Fornisce capacità di threat hunting per cercare proattivamente le intrusioni
  • It allows you to analyze and contain an attack in progress
  • Generate incident alerts and automate security responses

In summary, Deception lures and tricks attackers, while EDR detects and blocks infiltrating threats.

Conclusion

Deception technology and EDR tools are both invaluable in strengthening the security of organizations against today’s threats.

Deception provides early intrusion detection and the advantage of active deception, while EDR provides endpoint-level visibility, detection, and response capabilities. By integrating them together, you get unmatched active “on and off” network defense protection.

In fact, by combining Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Deception service with their SOCaaS EDR solutions, you can cover the corporate perimeter and critical endpoints with deceptive traps and real-time threat detection.

This multi-layered approach to active cyber defense helps identify and stop attacks in their early stages, dramatically reducing the risk of security breaches.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • iOS Activation Flaw Enables Pre-User Device Compromise and Identity Exposure (iOS 18.5) July 1, 2025
    Posted by josephgoyd via Fulldisclosure on Jun 30Title: iOS Activation Flaw Enables Pre-User Device Compromise Reported to Apple: May 19, 2025 Reported to US-CERT: May 19, 2025 US-CERT Case #: VU#346053 Vendor Status: Silent Public Disclosure: June 26, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A critical vulnerability exists in Apple’s iOS activation pipeline that allows...
  • Remote DoS in httpx 1.7.0 – Out-of-Bounds Read via Malformed <title> Tag June 26, 2025
    Posted by Brian Carpenter via Fulldisclosure on Jun 25Hey list, You can remotely crash httpx v1.7.0 (by ProjectDiscovery) by serving a malformed tag on your website. The bug is a classic out-of-bounds read in trimTitleTags() due to a missing bounds check when slicing the title string. It panics with: panic: runtime error: slice bounds out […]
  • CVE-2025-32978 - Quest KACE SMA Unauthenticated License Replacement June 24, 2025
    Posted by Seralys Research Team via Fulldisclosure on Jun 23 Seralys Security Advisory | https://www.seralys.com/research ====================================================================== Title: Unauthenticated License Replacement Product: Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Affected: Confirmed on 14.1 (older versions likely affected) Fixed in: 13.0.385, 13.1.81, 13.2.183, 14.0.341(Patch 5), 14.1.101(Patch 4) Vendor: Quest Software Discovered: April...
  • CVE-2025-32977 - Quest KACE Unauthenticated Backup Upload June 24, 2025
    Posted by Seralys Research Team via Fulldisclosure on Jun 23 Seralys Security Advisory | https://www.seralys.com/research ====================================================================== Title: Unauthenticated Backup Upload Product: Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Affected: Confirmed on 14.1 (older versions likely affected) Fixed in: 13.0.385, 13.1.81, 13.2.183, 14.0.341(Patch 5), 14.1.101(Patch 4) Vendor: Quest Software Discovered: April 2025...
  • CVE-2025-32976 - Quest KACE SMA 2FA Bypass June 24, 2025
    Posted by Seralys Research Team via Fulldisclosure on Jun 23 Seralys Security Advisory | https://www.seralys.com/research ====================================================================== Title: 2FA Bypass Product: Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Affected: Confirmed on 14.1 (older versions likely affected) Fixed in: 13.0.385, 13.1.81, 13.2.183, 14.0.341(Patch 5), 14.1.101(Patch 4) Vendor: Quest Software Discovered: April 2025 Severity: HIGH...
  • CVE-2025-32975 - Quest KACE SMA Authentication Bypass June 24, 2025
    Posted by Seralys Research Team via Fulldisclosure on Jun 23 Seralys Security Advisory | https://www.seralys.com/research ====================================================================== Title: Authentication Bypass Product: Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Affected: Confirmed on 14.1 (older versions likely affected) Fixed in: 13.0.385, 13.1.81, 13.2.183, 14.0.341(Patch 5), 14.1.101(Patch 4) Vendor: Quest Software Discovered: April 2025 Severity:...
  • RansomLord (NG v1.0) anti-ransomware exploit tool June 24, 2025
    Posted by malvuln on Jun 23First official NG versioned release with significant updates, fixes and new features https://github.com/malvuln/RansomLord/releases/tag/v1.0 RansomLord (NG) v1.0 Anti-Ransomware exploit tool. Proof-of-concept tool that automates the creation of PE files, used to exploit ransomware pre-encryption. Lang: C SHA256: ACB0C4EEAB421761B6C6E70B0FA1D20CE08247525641A7CD03B33A6EE3D35D8A Deweaponize feature PoC video:...
  • Disclosure Yealink Cloud vulnerabilities June 24, 2025
    Posted by Jeroen Hermans via Fulldisclosure on Jun 23Dear all, ---Abstract--- Yealink RPS contains several vulnerabilities that can lead to leaking of PII and/or MITM attacks. Some vulnerabilities are unpatched even after disclosure to the manufacturer. ---/Abstract--- We are Stefan Gloor and Jeroen Hermans. We are independent computer security researchers working on a disclosure process […]
  • : "Glass Cage" – Zero-Click iMessage → Persistent iOS Compromise + Bricking (CVE-2025-24085 / 24201, CNVD-2025-07885) June 18, 2025
    Posted by josephgoyd via Fulldisclosure on Jun 17"Glass Cage" – Sophisticated Zero-Click iMessage Exploit ChainEnabling Persistent iOS Compromise and Device Bricking CVE-2025-24085, CVE-2025-24201(CNVD-2025-07885) Author: Joseph Goydish II Date: 06/10/2025 Release Type: Full Disclosure Platform Affected: iOS 18.2 (confirmed zero-day at time of discovery) Delivery Vector: iMessage (default configuration) Impact: Remote Code Execution, Privilege Escalation, Keychain […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250612-0 :: Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in ONLYOFFICE Docs (DocumentServer) June 18, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Jun 17SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250612-0 > ======================================================================= title: Reflected Cross-Site Scripting product: ONLYOFFICE Docs (DocumentServer) vulnerable version:

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}