Falsi miti sicurezza informatica Piergiorgio Venuti

False IT security myths: because backup, cloud, firewall and antivirus alone are no longer enough

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Introduction

Cyber security has become a major concern for businesses and individuals. With cyberattacks and data breaches on the rise, many still believe that solutions like data backup, cloud storage, firewalls, and antivirus are enough to protect their digital assets. However, these solutions alone are no longer enough to deal with today’s threats. In this article we will analyze why these solutions can no longer be considered adequate and what you can do to improve your IT security.

The backup myth

Data backup has always been one of the pillars of any IT security strategy. Having a copy of your data allows you to restore them in the event of a ransomware attack or malfunctions. However, backup alone is no longer enough in the face of today’s Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs).

APT attacks expect hackers to remain hidden on the victim’s network for up to months, silently exfiltrating valuable data before being detected and neutralized. In these cases, the backup will contain a copy of the already compromised data, making it useless. Also, if hackers’ access is not eliminated, they will still be able to continue accessing the network and newly created backups. It is therefore necessary to integrate backup with active network monitoring solutions to identify and block this type of threat.

The false myth of the Cloud

Cloud storage is often seen as a way to increase data security, thanks to the redundancy and protection provided by providers. However, moving data to the cloud does not in itself improve cybersecurity. The attack surface simply moves from internal servers to those of the cloud provider. Also, the basic security offered by most providers only covers the protection of the cloud infrastructure, but does not analyze the data content for threats.

Encryption and data access policies must be implemented and managed by the customer. In case of a ransomware attack that encrypts your files, they will remain inaccessible even if they are in the cloud. It is therefore necessary to integrate additional security services to truly protect data in the cloud, as well as train personnel on the correct configuration of access policies.

The false myth of the Firewall

Firewalls are a crucial element for defining the perimeter of the corporate network and controlling incoming and outgoing traffic. However, a traditional firewall alone is no longer enough to block today’s cyberthreats. This for two main reasons:

  • Many attacks occur using legitimate channels that are allowed by the firewall, such as email, websites and file sharing. The firewall controls only the communication channel, not the conveyed content.
  • Insider threats—attacks originating from compromised employees or devices already on the network—bypass the firewall completely.

To improve protection, it is necessary to adopt new generation firewalls with advanced functions such as IPS (Intrusion Prevention), sandboxing and advanced threat protection to also control the contents conveyed by the network. You also need internal network monitoring tools.

The false myth of the Antivirus

Antiviruses are essential for protecting endpoints such as PCs, laptops and servers from malware such as viruses, ransomware, spyware, trojans and worms. However, even traditional antivirus alone is no longer enough to stop today’s advanced threats. The reasons are two:

  • They rely on signature databases of known malware, and are therefore ineffective against new, unknown threats.
  • They can be fooled or disabled by advanced malware.

To improve the level of protection, enterprises should equip themselves with next-generation antiviruses that incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning to detect even unknown threats based on their anomalous behavior, as well as signature databases. Furthermore, these advanced antiviruses adopt self-protection techniques to prevent deactivation.

Conclusion: The need for a modern integrated approach

As we have seen, solutions such as backup, cloud, firewalls and antivirus – while still important – are no longer sufficient by themselves to protect businesses and users against today’s advanced and constantly evolving cyberthreats.

Serve invece un approccio stratificato e moderno che integri: protezione avanzata degli endpoint, monitoraggio attivo 24/7 della rete per rilevare minacce interne ed esterne, formazione continua del personale, backup crittografati e immutabili, e server e postazioni separate per limitare l’impatto di eventuali attacchi.

In this context, services such as Cyberfero SOCaaS, which combine professional 24/7 monitoring of the corporate network with threat analysis via a modern Security Operation Center, and advanced endpoint protection, can significantly improve the level of security for companies and organizations.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Apache Struts2 Core Arbitrary Code Execution via OGNL Sandbox Escape November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below attempt to prevent arbitrary code execution via Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) through several different mechanisms but only in a cursory fashion -- the libraries only guard against immediate calls evaluated by the OGNL engine via `SecurityMemberAccess`, but an allowed […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core TokenHelper Token Cryptographic Timing Side-Channel November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Core 7.4.0 and below performs session token comparisons cryptographically insecure early-exit comparison functions (e.g., `!=`, `memcmp`, byte-by-byte loops with `break`) that return as soon as the first mismatched byte is encountered. The execution time of the comparison is therefore proportional to the number […]
  • Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin Uses a Previously Closed Resource November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin opens a Spring `ApplicationContex` via a try-with-resources block and, outside of said block, then continues to use the closed resource, resulting in an uncaught `IllegalStateException`. This particular issue prevents proper functionality and indicates poor code quality and code review standards and […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Integer Overflow November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below fails to properly prevent integer overflows, causing wrap-arounds and other issues on a downstream forced casting into types smaller than `BigInteger`. Importantly, this finding underscores why all applications using Struts and other such platforms should perform their own input […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Cross-Origin Protection Exemption Miskeyed to a Deployment-Wide Path November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below's `FetchMetadataInterceptor`, `CoepInterceptor`, and `CoopInterceptor` each compare their `exemptedPaths` configuration -- a per-interceptor-reference, administrator-supplied set of paths intended to exempt specific actions from the corresponding cross-origin protection -- against `HttpServletRequest.getContextPath()`. `getContextPath()` is fixed for the entire deployed web...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Fails to Properly Parse Chunked Requests November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's (version 7.4.0 and below) `ContentTypeInterceptor.intercept(ActionInvocation)` only deserialises a request body and enforces the `struts.rest.content.maxLength` bound when `HttpServletRequest#getContentLength()` returns a positive value. `getContentLength()` returns `-1` whenever the `Content-Length` header is absent, which normal and appropriate for any Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Untrimmed `Accept` Header Tokens Break Content Negation Fallback November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's `DefaultContentTypeHandlerManager.getHandlerForResponse(HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse)` splits the `Accept` header on commas and passes each resulting token directly to `findHandler(String)` without trimming leading or trailing whitespace. `findHandler(String)` only retries a trimmed lookup when a token contains a semicolon (`;`), so a token that merely carries […]
  • Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin Insecure Deserialisation -- Object Deserialisation Element-Count Limit Bypass November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01As of the current versions of the Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin (e.g., version 7.4.0 and the 7.5.0 snapshot dated 28 October 2026), attackers can bypass the element-count limit purported to protect Object deserialisation added to said code as part of the WW-5618 and S2-072 "hardening controls". Please […]
  • [0day-rubbish] NETGEAR RAX120 V1.2.5.18 authenticated SOAP InstallApp OS command injection to root-configured web-stack execution (6.8 Medium; conditionally 7.2 High with management exposure) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in NETGEAR RAX120 (Nighthawk AX12) firmware V1.2.5.18, the WiFi 6 consumer router from NETGEAR (United States), built on the Qualcomm IPQ8074 platform. The administrative web plane of this firmware generation is a lighttpd server fronting the vendor's DNI-framework CGI […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Raritan PX3 PDU G4 firmware 4.3.14 command injection in the ping and traceroute diagnostics through an inverted hostname-validation return check (8.8) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in the Raritan PX3 PDU G4, firmware version 4.3.14, the intelligent rack power distribution unit from Raritan, a Legrand company (United States). A low-privilege authenticated session converts one diagnostics request into operating-system command execution in the product's web-service context, […]

Customers