shadow IT Piergiorgio Venuti

Shadow IT: an overview

The practice of shadow IT is the use of computer systems, devices, software, applications and services without the explicit approval of the IT department. In recent years, it has grown exponentially with the adoption of cloud-based applications and services.

While shadow IT could improve employee productivity and drive innovation, it can also introduce serious security risks to the organization due to data breaches, potential compliance breaches and more.

Why users practice shadow IT

One of the main reasons employees apply shadow IT is simply to work more efficiently. A 2012 RSA study reported that 35% of employees believe they need to bypass their company’s security policies just to get their job done right. For example, an employee may discover a better file sharing application than is officially allowed. Once you start using it, the use may spread to other members of your department.

The rapid growth of cloud-based consumer applications has also increased the adoption of shadow IT practices. The days of packaged software are long gone; Common applications such as Slack and Dropbox are available with a simple click, and corporate data is easily copied beyond work applications to employee personal devices, such as smartphones or laptops, especially in BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) working conditions .

Shadow IT: Security Risks and Challenges

The point is that if the IT department is not aware of the use of an application, they cannot support or guarantee that it is secure. Industry analyst firm Gartner predicted, in 2018, that by 2020, one-third of successful attacks businesses experience focus on their shadow IT assets.

While it is clear that the practice will not go away, organizations can minimize risks by educating end users and taking preventative measures to monitor and manage unauthorized applications.

Not all shadow IT is inherently dangerous, but some features like file sharing and storage and collaboration (for example, Google Docs) can cause sensitive data leaks. This risk goes beyond applications alone: the RSA study also reports that 63% of employees send work documents to their personal email to work from home, exposing data to networks that cannot be monitored.

In times like the one we are experiencing, in which teleworking is encouraged and, in some cases, the only possible solution, it is essential to have an eye for the applications in use on employees’ computers.

shadow IT

Benefits of Shadow IT

Despite the risks, shadow IT has its advantages. Getting IT approval can take time that employees can’t afford to waste.For many employees, approval is a productivity bottleneck, especially when they can get a fix in minutes.

Having IT behaving like an Orwellian “Big Brother” doesn’t always help productivity. Discerning cases of positive shadow IT can be the best compromise. Finding a middle ground can allow end users to research solutions that work best for them. This gives IT time to control user data and permissions for applications. If end users do not need to request new solutions, the IT department has been given time to focus on more critical tasks.

Proactive defense

Whatever the reason why shadow IT occurs, if the IT department is unaware of it, the risk of breach is high. What the corporate cyber security departments should do is implement automated traffic and behavior control systems.

The solution offered by a SOC as a Service is the most complete in this respect. It allows you to keep an eye on all the devices in the system and also monitor user behavior.

Thanks to the Nextgen SIEM and UEBA systems, in fact, the collection of usage data is easy and manageable in real time. The data collected is enriched and aggregated to give analysts the most complete view possible and allow rapid intervention. Meanwhile, the UEBA system checks that there are no anomalous behavior by users or suspicious outgoing data traffic.

Shadow IT, while not usually a malicious attack, is a practice that should be discouraged and, as it is risky, stopped in the bud.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [REVIVE-SA-2026-002] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities June 5, 2026
    Posted by Matteo Beccati on Jun 04======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2026-002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2026-002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2026-06-03 Risk Level: Medium to High Applications affected: Revive Adserver Versions...
  • CyberDanube Security Research 20260528-0 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in Multiple Vulnerabilities in Mennekes Amtron Series June 1, 2026
    Posted by Thomas Weber | CyberDanube via Fulldisclosure on May 31CyberDanube Security Research 20260528-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Multiple Vulnerabilities product| Mennekes Amtron Series and Smart-T PnC vulnerable version| 5.22.3 fixed version| 5.33.11-21500 CVE number| CVE-2026-8979, CVE-2026-8980 impact| High homepage| https://www.mennekes.at/ found|...
  • bmcweb (OpenBMC web server): four vulnerabilities — two unfixed, GHSA without a CVE June 1, 2026
    Posted by binreaper via Fulldisclosure on May 31Hi all, Posting a brief summary of a four-finding disclosure on bmcweb (the OpenBMC HTTP/Redfish web server), which ships in BMC firmware on most modern enterprise servers — Intel, IBM, HPE, NVIDIA, and various ODMs. Full timeline and analysis on the blog: https://binreaper.pages.dev/posts/2026-05-27-bmcweb-disclosure/ ## Why bmcweb matters A […]
  • Re: Dovecot Security Advisory OXDC-2026-0002 May 26, 2026
    Posted by Noel Butler via Fulldisclosure on May 25So when is the fix for dovecot 2.3 source code due to be released? Since by your wording by not including the first detected versions, it must be assumed 2.3 is affected, and as no EOL has been published or announced for 2.3.x, and as 2.3 is […]
  • SSRF in Anthropic mcp-server-fetch and Microsoft playwright-mcp — publicly disclosed via GitHub issues May 26, 2026
    Posted by outreach on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Title: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Anthropic mcp-server-fetch and Microsoft playwright-mcp Author: Syed Anas Mohiuddin Date: May 25, 2026 CVSS: 7.5 (HIGH) — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N References: Already public via GitHub issues (see below) == AFFECTED PRODUCTS == 1. Anthropic mcp-server-fetch (modelcontextprotocol/servers) All versions as of May...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2021-21735 - ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 Unauthenticated Admin Credential Leak May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2021-001 CVE ID: CVE-2021-21735 Title: ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 - Unauthenticated Wizard Credential Disclosure to Full Admin Compromise Affected: ZTE ZXHN H168N V3.5 Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public URL:...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34474 - ZTE H298A/H108N Unauthenticated Admin Credential Exposure May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-003 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34474 Title: ZTE ZXHN H298A / H108N - Unauthenticated Admin Password & WLAN Credential Exposure Affected: ZTE ZXHN H298A 1.1, ZTE ZXHN H108N 2.6 (EOL; no patch planned) Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public […]
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34472 - ZTE ZXHN H188A V6 Authentication Bypass via Pre-Login Wizard May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-002 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34472 Title: ZTE ZXHN H188A V6 - Authentication Bypass via Pre-Login Wizard Credential Leakage Affected: ZTE ZXHN H188A V6.0.10P2_TE, V6.0.10P3N3_TE Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail com Public URL:...
  • [SECURITY ADVISORY] CVE-2026-34473 - Unauthenticated DoS in 17+ ZTE Router Models (140K+ Devices) May 26, 2026
    Posted by m.nageh on May 25-----BEGIN SECURITY ADVISORY----- Advisory ID: MONX-2026-001 CVE ID: CVE-2026-34473 Title: Unauthenticated Denial of Service via Oversized POST Body in ZTE Router CGILua Parser Affected: 17+ ZTE ZXHN router models (~140,000 publicly exposed devices) CVSS Score: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) Date: 2026-05-20 Author: Mina Nageh Salalma (Monx Research) Contact: minanageh379 () gmail...
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Sparx Pro Cloud Server and Enterprise Architect May 26, 2026
    Posted by Adamczyk Blazej on May 25━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Multiple vulnerabilities in Sparx Pro Cloud Server and Enterprise Architect ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ General...

Customers