WastedLocker Ransomware Giacomo Lanzi

WastedLocker: Next generation ransomware

WastedLocker is ransomware attack software that began targeting businesses and other organizations in May 2020. It is known for its high ransom demands reaching millions of dollars per victim. It is the product of a group of highly skilled cyber criminals who have been operating for over a decade: Evil Corp.

Who is behind WastedLocker Ransomware

The group behind WastedLocker goes by the name of Evil Corp and some of the individuals associated with it have a long history in the world of cybercrime. The group is best known for managing the Dridex malware and botnet since 2011, but has also been responsible for creating ransomware programs over the years.

Through various episodes of criminal attacks, the group has been developing malware targeting mainly US companies since 2011. For this reason they have been known to the police for some time. After a period of inactivity, the group reappeared in January 2020 and their activity resumed as usual, with victims appearing in the same regions as before.

WastedLocker is a completely new program from Evil Corp that began infecting organizations in May 2020. It does not share the code with BitPaymer (a previously used software) but shows other similarities in the ransom note and per-victim customization. Evil Corp’s lack of activity between March and May could be explained by the group that was working on developing this new cyber threat as well as other tools that make up its toolset.

WastedLocker Hacker

How does it work

According to Symantec reports, the infection chain for WastedLocker starts with a JavaScript-based attack framework. The framework, called SocGholish, is distributed as a fake browser update from warnings displayed on legitimate but compromised websites. Hacked news websites are a common vector.

The SocGholish framework is distributed as a ZIP file. Once opened and executed, it initiates a chain of attacks that involves downloading and running PowerShell scripts and the Cobalt Strike backdoor. Evil Corp has used this same distribution technique in the past to distribute the Dridex Trojan, so it has been part of its arsenal for a long time.

Once hackers gain access to a computer, they begin distributing various tools to steal user credentials. In addition, they can also increase privileges and perform a lateral movement to other machines. The attackers’ goal is to identify and gain access to high-value systems such as servers. They then implement an ad hoc binary file on the compromised machines for the victims.

The use of manual hacking and system administration tools are part of a trend observed in recent years. According to this trend, cybercriminals are increasingly adopting attack techniques that in the past were associated with cyber espionage. This trend poses a serious problem for smaller organizations that lack the budget and IT resources to deploy defenses against advanced threats, but are a frequent target for ransomware groups and other financially motivated cybercriminals.

WestedLocker in detail

WastedLocker uses a combination of AES and RSA encryption in its encryption routine which is similar to other ransomware programs. Each file is encrypted with a unique 256-bit AES key generated on-the-fly. These AES keys along with other information about the encrypted files are then encrypted with a 4096-bit public RSA key which is encoded in the WastedLocker binary. Attackers keep the private part of the RSA key pair needed to retrieve AES keys and decrypt individual files.

According to an analysis by Kaspersky Lab, the encryption routine is strong and correctly implemented. So the victims cannot recover their files without the attacker’s private RSA key. Because it is a manually distributed ransomware threat customized to each target, attackers generate unique RSA key pairs for each victim. I mean, the key received from one organization after paying the ransom will not work to decrypt the files of another affected organization.

Some distinctive aspects of WastedLocker

The WastedLocker ransomware has a mechanism that allows attackers to prioritize certain directories during the encryption routine. This is probably used to ensure that the most important and valuable files are encrypted first in case the encryption process is detected by the system administrators and stopped while it is in progress.

The malware appends an extension to files consisting of the victim’s name and the word “wasted”. Also, it generates a text file with the ransom note for each file, which means that each directory will contain hundreds or thousands of copies of the ransom note.

WastedLocker is designed to delete shadow copies (the default backups made by the Windows operating system) and tries to encrypt files on the network, including remote backups.

After the July 2020 attacks

The Securonix Threat Research Team (STR) is actively investigating the details of Wastedlocker ransomware critical attacks. These have reportedly already affected more than 31 companies, of which 8 are Fortune 500 companies.

Impact

Here are the key details regarding the impact of WastedLocker ransomware attacks:

WastedLocker ransomware is relatively new, used by EvilCorp, which previously used the Dridex trojan to distribute BitPaymer ransomware in attacks against government organizations and businesses in the US and Europe.

Evil Corp group is currently focusing on targeted attacks on multiple industry casualties in recent months. Garmin is one of the latest high profile victims attacked (officially confirmed by Garmin on July 27).

– The most recent ransom amount requested was $10 million and appears to be based on the victim’s financial data. Based on the available details, the ransom has probably been paid.

– To date, a mono-extortion scheme appears to have been used, ie with only encryption and no or minimal data loss.

WastedLocker hacker

How to defend yourself

Following the analysis of the attacks and the data available, we want to suggest methods of mitigation and prevention of attacks.

– Review the backup retention policies. Make sure these are stored in a location that cannot be accessed / encrypted by the operator who placed the targeted ransomware. For example, consider write-only remote backup.

Implement a training program on the safety of end users (company employees). Since end users are the targets of ransomware, it is best that they are aware of the current risks. It is important that they are aware of the threat of ransomware and how it occurs.

Patches of infrastructure operating systems, software and firmware. Consider the possibility of leveraging a centralized patch management system.

Maintain regular, air-gaped backups of critical company / infrastructure data. An air-gaped backup and recovery strategy means making sure that at least one copy of your organization’s data is offline and not accessible from any network.

Implement security monitoring, particularly for high-value targets, to detect in advance any malicious ransomware operator positioning activity.

As always, we at SOD are available for advice and to suggest you which services you can implement for the safety of your company. Contact us to find out how we can help you keep your business defenses high.

Useful links:

 

The most dangerous Ransomware in 2020

Secure Online Desktop – Company

Critical ransomware: examples of successful attacks

 

Contact us

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Multi-Protocol Traceroute August 19, 2025
    Posted by Usman Saeed via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Adaptive Multi-Protocol Traceroute Author: Usman Saeed email: u () defzero net Website: www.defzero.net Description: This script is a TTL-based path mapper that reveals routes even when classic traceroute is filtered. The idea was that it would run in passes: first a conventional trace (ICMP […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250728-0 :: Stored Cross-Site-Scripting in Optimizely Episerver CMS August 19, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18Confidentiality class: Internal & Partner SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < publishing date 20250728-0 > ======================================================================= title: Multiple Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities product: Optimizely Episerver Content Management System (EPiServer.CMS.Core) vulnerable version: Version 11.X:
  • SEC Consult SA-20250807-0 :: Race Condition in Shopware Voucher Submission August 19, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Aug 18Confidentiality class: Internal & Partner SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < publishing date 20250807-0 > ======================================================================= title: Race Condition in Shopware Voucher Submission product: Shopware 6 vulnerable version: v6.6.10.4 fixed version: No fixed version available yet CVE number: CVE-2025-7954 impact: medium...
  • Insufficient Resource Allocation Limits in nopCommerce v4.10 and v4.80.3 Excel Import Functionality August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce is vulnerable to Insufficient Resource Allocation Limits when handling large Excel file imports. Although the application provides a warning message recommending that users avoid importing more than 500–1,000 records at once due to memory constraints, the system does not enforce hard limits on file size, record count, or […]
  • CSV Injection in nopcommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce versions v4.10 and v4.80.3 are vulnerable to *C*SV Injection (Formula Injection) when exporting data to CSV. The application does not properly sanitize user-supplied input before including it in CSV export files. An attacker can inject malicious spreadsheet formulas into fields that will later be exported (for example, order […]
  • Insufficient Session Cookie Invalidation in nopCommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18nopCommerce v4.10 and 4.80.3 is vulnerable to Insufficient Invalidation of Session Cookies. The application does not properly invalidate or expire authentication cookies after logout or session termination. An attacker who obtains a valid session cookie (e.g., via network interception, XSS, or system compromise) can continue to use the cookie […]
  • Session Fixation Vulnerability in iDempiere WebUI v 12.0.0.202508171158 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18The application does not issue a new session identifier (JSESSIONID) after successful authentication. An attacker who can set or predict a victim’s session ID prior to login may hijack the victim’s authenticated session once they log in, resulting in full account takeover. POST /webui HTTP/2 Host: Cookie: JSESSIONID=node01***.node0;
  • CSV Injection in iDempiere WebUI 12.0.0.202508171158 August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18A CSV Injection vulnerability exists in iDempiere WebUI v12.0.0.202508171158. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before including it in exported CSV files. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious spreadsheet formulas (e.g., =cmd|&apos;/C notepad&apos;!A1) into fields that are later exported. When the CSV is opened in spreadsheet software […]
  • liblcf v0.8.1 liblcf/lcf2xml: Untrusted LCF data triggers uncaught std::length_error via negative vector resize (DoS) August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18lcf2xml (part of liblcf) aborts when parsing specially crafted RPG Maker 2000/2003 files that supply a negative element count for vectors of structured records. The generic reader: template void Struct::ReadLcf(std::vector& vec, LcfReader& stream) { int count = stream.ReadInt(); vec.resize(count); // huge size_t -> throws length_error for (int i = […]
  • liblcf v0.8.1 Integer Overflow in liblcf `ReadInt()` Leads to Out-of-Bounds Reads and Denial of Service August 19, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Aug 18A crafted RPG Maker save file (`.lsd`) can trigger an integer overflow in liblcf’s lcfstrings compressed integer decoding logic (`LcfReader::ReadInt()`), resulting in an unbounded shift and accumulation loop. The overflowed value is later used in buffer size allocations and structure parsing, causing large memory access requests and parsing errors. […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}