Advanced Persistent Threat hacker Giacomo Lanzi

Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

An advanced persistent threat (APT) is a broad term used to describe an attack campaign in which an intruder, or a group of intruders, establishes an illicit and long-term presence on a network in order to extract highly sensitive data. The targets of these assaults, which are chosen and studied with great care, typically include large corporations or government networks. The consequences of such intrusions are vast, and include:

  • Theft of intellectual property (for example, trade secrets or patents)
  • Compromise of sensitive information (for example, private data of employees and users)
  • Sabotage of critical organizational infrastructures (for example, deletion of databases)
  • Total control takeover of the site

Executing an APT assault requires more resources than a standard attack on web applications. The perpetrators are usually teams of experienced cybercriminals who have substantial financial backing. Some APT attacks are government-funded and used as weapons of cyber warfare.

Common attacks, such as Remote File Inclusion (RFI), SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS), are frequently used by the perpetrators to establish a foothold in a targeted network. Then, Trojans and backdoor shells are often employed to expand that foothold and create a persistent presence within the perimeter.

Advanced Persistent Threat Laptop

Progression of Advanced Persistent Threats

A successful APT attack can be divided into three phases: 1) network infiltration, 2) expansion of the attacker’s presence, and 3) extraction of the accumulated data, all without being detected.

  1. Network Infiltration

As mentioned, every advanced persistent threat begins with an infiltration. Companies are typically infiltrated through the compromise of one of the following areas: web resources, network resources, or authorized human users. This is achieved either through malicious uploads or social engineering attacks. All these are threats regularly faced by large organizations.

Infiltrators may also simultaneously carry out a DDoS attack against their target. This serves both as a smokescreen to distract the network staff and as a means to weaken a security perimeter, making it easier to breach.

Once initial access is gained, attackers quickly install a backdoor malware shell that secures access to the network and allows for stealthy remote operations. Backdoors may also manifest as Trojans disguised as legitimate software.

  1. Expansion of Presence

After the foothold is established, attackers move to expand their presence within the network and thereby “create” the true advanced persistent threat.

This involves moving up the hierarchy of an organization, compromising staff members with access to the most sensitive data. By doing so, attackers are able to gather critical business information, including product line information, employee data, and financial records.

Depending on the ultimate goal of the attack, the accumulated data might be sold to a competing enterprise, altered to sabotage a company’s product line, or used to take down an entire organization. If sabotage is the motive, this phase is used to subtly gain control of more critical functions and manipulate them in a specific sequence to cause maximum damage.

For instance, attackers might delete entire databases within a company and then disrupt network communications to prolong the recovery process.

  1. Data Extraction

While an APT event is ongoing, the stolen information is typically stored in a secure location within the compromised network. Once enough data has been collected, the thieves must extract it without being detected.

Typically, white noise tactics are used to distract the security team so that the information can be moved out. This might take the form of a DDoS attack, again tying up network personnel and/or weakening the site’s defenses to facilitate extraction.

Advanced Persistent Threat hacker

Security Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

Proper detection and protection against APTs require a multifaceted approach from network administrators, security providers, and individual users.

Traffic Monitoring

Monitoring incoming and outgoing traffic is considered best practice to prevent the installation of backdoors and block the extraction of stolen data. Inspecting traffic within the corporate network perimeter can also help alert security personnel to any unusual behavior that may indicate malicious activity.

A web application firewall (WAF) deployed at the network edge filters traffic to web servers, thus protecting one of your most vulnerable attack surfaces. Among other functions, a WAF can help eliminate application-level attacks, such as RFI and SQL injection attacks, commonly used during the APT infiltration phase.

Traffic monitoring services for internal traffic, such as network firewalls, are the other side of this equation. They can provide a granular view that shows how users are interacting within your network, while helping to identify internal traffic anomalies (e.g., irregular logins or unusually large data transfers). The latter could indicate an ongoing APT attack. It is also possible to monitor access to file shares or system honeypots.

Lastly, incoming traffic monitoring services might be useful for detecting and removing backdoor shells. For comprehensive monitoring services, adopting the SOCaaS from SOD might be right for you.

advanced persistent threat security

Additional Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

In addition to the best practices already mentioned for preventing an advanced persistent threat on the corporate network, it is wise to take action on multiple fronts. In numerous other articles, we have discussed how beneficial it is for the security team to have a single place to monitor every point of the network. An excellent tool for this purpose is a SOC.

Our SOCaaS offers all the functionalities of a Security Operations Center without the burden of investing in equipment and specialized personnel. Moreover, thanks to UEBA technology, not only is our SOC able to retrieve and systematically store logs, but it is also actively involved in identifying suspicious user behavior.

These features are great for increasing the responsiveness of the security team and averting even attempts of advanced persistent threats against the corporate network.

To learn how we can help your company enhance its security, do not hesitate to contact us; we will be pleased to answer any questions.

Useful links:

Link utili:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • User Enumeration in IServ Schoolserver Web Login September 11, 2025
    Posted by naphthalin via Fulldisclosure on Sep 10“I know where your children go to school.” The web front end of the IServ school server from IServ GmbH allows user enumeration. Responses during failed login attempts differ, depending on if the user account exists, does not exist and other conditions. While this does not pose a […]
  • Re: Apple’s A17 Pro Chip: Critical Flaw Causes Dual Subsystem Failure & Forensic Log Loss September 11, 2025
    Posted by Matthew Fernandez on Sep 10Can you elaborate on why you consider this high severity? From the description, it sounds as if this behaviour is fail-closed. That is, the effects are limited to DoS, with security properties preserved.
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 92): more stupid blunders of Windows' File Explorer September 8, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08Hi @ll, this extends the two previous posts titled Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 90): "Digital Signature" property sheet missing without "Read Extended Attributes" access permission and Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 91): yet another 30 year old bug of the […]
  • Critical Security Report – Remote Code Execution via Persistent Discord WebRTC Automation September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08Reporter: [Taylor Christian Newsome / SleepRaps () gmail com] Date: [8/21/2025] Target: Discord WebRTC / Voice Gateway API Severity: Critical 1. Executive Summary A proof-of-concept (PersistentRTC) demonstrates remote code execution (RCE) capability against Discord users. The PoC enables Arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim’s browser context via WebRTC automation. […]
  • Submission of Critical Firmware Parameters – PCIe HCA Cards September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08*To:* support () mellanox com, networking-support () nvidia com *From:* Taylor Christian Newsome *Date:* August 20, 2025 *Dear Mellanox/NVIDIA Networking Support Team,* I am writing to formally submit the critical firmware parameters for Mellanox PCI Express Host Channel Adapter (HCA) cards, as detailed in the official documentation available here: […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250908-0 :: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up in KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) September 8, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250908-0 > ======================================================================= title: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up product: KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) vulnerable version: Current firmware/hardware as of Q2/2025 fixed version: No version numbers available CVE number:...
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in FFmpeg cache: Protocol (CacheEntry::size) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg cache: URL protocol implementation. The CacheEntry structure uses a 32-bit signed integer to store cache entry sizes (int size), but the cache layer can accumulate cached data exceeding 2 GB. Once entry->size grows beyond INT_MAX and new data is appended, an […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in DSCP Option Handling of FFmpeg UDP Protocol September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg UDP protocol implementation ( libavformat/udp.c) where the dscp parameter is parsed from a URI and left-shifted without bounds checking. Supplying a maximum 32-bit signed integer (2147483647) triggers undefined behavior due to a left shift that exceeds the representable range of int. This results […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in UDP Protocol Handler (fifo_size option) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A signed integer overflow exists in FFmpeg’s udp.c implementation when parsing the fifo_size option from a user-supplied UDP URL. The overflow occurs during multiplication, which is used to compute the size of the circular receive buffer. This can result in undefined behavior, allocation failures, or potentially memory corruption depending […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ LADSPA Filter Arbitrary Shared Object Loading via Unsanitized Environment Variables September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08The ladspa audio filter implementation (libavfilter/af_ladspa.c) in FFmpeg allows unsanitized environment variables to influence dynamic library loading. Specifically, the filter uses getenv("LADSPA_PATH") and getenv("HOME") when resolving the plugin shared object (.so) name provided through the file option. These values are concatenated into a filesystem path and passed directly into […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}