Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) Piergiorgio Venuti

Advanced Persistent Threat (APT): because they make the backup system useless and the false perception of security

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Index

  1. Introduction
  2. What is an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)
  3. Because APTs make the backup system useless
  4. The false perception of security
  5. The best ways to counter APTs
  6. How the Cyberfero SOCaaS service increases corporate security
  7. Conclusion

Introduction

Cybersecurity is an area of growing importance to businesses, due to the increase in frequency and complexity of cyberattacks. One of the more insidious threats are Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs), which can penetrate computer systems and remain hidden for long periods, causing long-term damage. In this article, we’ll look at APTs and why they render your backup system useless and give rise to a false perception of security. We will also discuss the best ways to counter APTs and how Cyberfero’s Security Operations Center as a Service (SOCaaS) service can increase corporate security.

What is an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT)

An Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) is a type of cyber attack in which a malicious actor enters a computer system and remains hidden there for long periods, often months or years. APTs are made by highly skilled and well-funded hacker groups, often linked to foreign governments or criminal organizations. The main objective of an APT is to steal sensitive information, such as trade secrets, intellectual property and personal data, or to cause damage to the target organization’s computer systems.

APTs are distinguished from other types of cyber attacks by their persistence and their ability to stay hidden. Malicious actors use a number of advanced techniques, including the use of sophisticated malware, zero-day vulnerability exploits, and social engineering, to penetrate computer systems and disguise their presence.

Because APTs make the backup system useless

Backup systems are often considered one of the main security measures to protect corporate data. However, APTs can render the backup system useless in several ways:

  1. Compromissione del backup: gli attori malevoli possono infiltrarsi nei sistemi di backup e infettarli con malware, rendendo inutilizzabili i dati di backup al momento del ripristino.
  2. Deleting or modifying backups: APTs can be designed to delete or modify backup data, compromising its integrity and making data recovery impossible.
  3. Recovering Compromised Systems: In the event of an APT attack, restoring data from a backup may not be sufficient to remove the threat, as the malicious actors may have already compromised the operating system or other critical computer system components.

The false perception of security

APTs can give rise to a false perception of security for several reasons:

  1. Long Latency: APTs are designed to remain hidden in the system for long periods, which means that an organization may not be aware of the compromise, mistakenly believing it is protected.
  2. Invisibility to traditional security systems: APT attacks use advanced techniques to avoid detection by traditional security systems, such as antivirus and firewalls. This can lead organizations to believe they are safe when in reality they are under attack.
  3. Excessive reliance on backup systems: As explained earlier, APTs can render the backup system useless, but many organizations still rely on these systems as their primary data protection measure. This over-reliance on backups can lead to a false sense of security.

The best ways to counter APTs

While APTs are insidious threats, there are several strategies organizations can adopt to counter them:

  1. User education and awareness: Educating users on how to recognize and prevent cyber-attacks is key to reducing the risk of compromise by APTs.
  2. Network traffic monitoring and analysis: Implementing network traffic monitoring solutions can help identify anomalies and suspicious activity that could indicate the presence of an APT.
  3. Vulnerability management: It is important to keep systems and applications up-to-date, promptly patching vulnerabilities to reduce the risk of APT attacks.
  4. Network Segmentation: Network segmentation can limit the spread of an APT within the IT infrastructure, preventing malicious actors from gaining access to critical data.
  5. Implementing advanced security solutions: Using advanced security solutions, such as intrusion detection and prevention systems (IDPS) and threat intelligence, can help detect and block APT attacks.

How the Cyberfero SOCaaS service increases corporate security

Cyberfero’s Security Operations Center as a Service (SOCaaS) provides a comprehensive solution for detecting, preventing, and responding to APT attacks. SOCaaS combines advanced security technologies with the experience of cybersecurity experts to continuously monitor the organization’s IT infrastructure and quickly identify any threats. The main benefits of the SOCaaS service include:

  1. 24/7 monitoring: SOCaaS ensures constant monitoring of the IT infrastructure, promptly detecting and responding to threats.
  2. Threat Intelligence: The SOCaaS service uses risk and threat intelligence to quickly identify potential APT attacks and other advanced threats.
  3. Security Incident Management: In the event of an APT compromise, the SOCaaS team of security experts can manage the incident, coordinating response and recovery.
  4. Cost reduction: the adoption of the SOCaaS service allows organizations to reduce the costs associated with the management of internal security, such as the hiring and training of specialized personnel.

Conclusion

Advanced Persistent Threats pose a significant threat to organizations, capable of compromising cybersecurity and causing long-term damage. APTs can render the backup system useless and give rise to a false perception of security, but there are several strategies organizations can adopt to counter them, such as user education, network traffic monitoring, vulnerability management, network segmentation and the implementation of advanced security solutions.
The Cyberfero SOCaaS service offers a complete solution for the prevention and response to APT attacks, offering constant monitoring of the IT infrastructure and the use of advanced security technologies to promptly identify and respond to threats. Adopting a security solution like SOCaaS can help organizations protect their data and reduce the costs associated with internal security management.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Apache Struts2 Core Arbitrary Code Execution via OGNL Sandbox Escape November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below attempt to prevent arbitrary code execution via Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) through several different mechanisms but only in a cursory fashion -- the libraries only guard against immediate calls evaluated by the OGNL engine via `SecurityMemberAccess`, but an allowed […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core TokenHelper Token Cryptographic Timing Side-Channel November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Core 7.4.0 and below performs session token comparisons cryptographically insecure early-exit comparison functions (e.g., `!=`, `memcmp`, byte-by-byte loops with `break`) that return as soon as the first mismatched byte is encountered. The execution time of the comparison is therefore proportional to the number […]
  • Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin Uses a Previously Closed Resource November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 Spring Plugin opens a Spring `ApplicationContex` via a try-with-resources block and, outside of said block, then continues to use the closed resource, resulting in an uncaught `IllegalStateException`. This particular issue prevents proper functionality and indicates poor code quality and code review standards and […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Integer Overflow November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below fails to properly prevent integer overflows, causing wrap-arounds and other issues on a downstream forced casting into types smaller than `BigInteger`. Importantly, this finding underscores why all applications using Struts and other such platforms should perform their own input […]
  • Apache Struts2 Core Cross-Origin Protection Exemption Miskeyed to a Deployment-Wide Path November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description Apache Struts2 Core version 7.4.0 and below's `FetchMetadataInterceptor`, `CoepInterceptor`, and `CoopInterceptor` each compare their `exemptedPaths` configuration -- a per-interceptor-reference, administrator-supplied set of paths intended to exempt specific actions from the corresponding cross-origin protection -- against `HttpServletRequest.getContextPath()`. `getContextPath()` is fixed for the entire deployed web...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Fails to Properly Parse Chunked Requests November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's (version 7.4.0 and below) `ContentTypeInterceptor.intercept(ActionInvocation)` only deserialises a request body and enforces the `struts.rest.content.maxLength` bound when `HttpServletRequest#getContentLength()` returns a positive value. `getContentLength()` returns `-1` whenever the `Content-Length` header is absent, which normal and appropriate for any Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)...
  • Apache Struts2 REST Plugin Untrimmed `Accept` Header Tokens Break Content Negation Fallback November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01Description The Apache Struts2 REST Plugin's `DefaultContentTypeHandlerManager.getHandlerForResponse(HttpServletRequest, HttpServletResponse)` splits the `Accept` header on commas and passes each resulting token directly to `findHandler(String)` without trimming leading or trailing whitespace. `findHandler(String)` only retries a trimmed lookup when a token contains a semicolon (`;`), so a token that merely carries […]
  • Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin Insecure Deserialisation -- Object Deserialisation Element-Count Limit Bypass November 2, 2026
    Posted by Daniel Owens via Fulldisclosure on Nov 01As of the current versions of the Apache Struts2 JSON Plugin (e.g., version 7.4.0 and the 7.5.0 snapshot dated 28 October 2026), attackers can bypass the element-count limit purported to protect Object deserialisation added to said code as part of the WW-5618 and S2-072 "hardening controls". Please […]
  • [0day-rubbish] NETGEAR RAX120 V1.2.5.18 authenticated SOAP InstallApp OS command injection to root-configured web-stack execution (6.8 Medium; conditionally 7.2 High with management exposure) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in NETGEAR RAX120 (Nighthawk AX12) firmware V1.2.5.18, the WiFi 6 consumer router from NETGEAR (United States), built on the Qualcomm IPQ8074 platform. The administrative web plane of this firmware generation is a lighttpd server fronting the vendor's DNI-framework CGI […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Raritan PX3 PDU G4 firmware 4.3.14 command injection in the ping and traceroute diagnostics through an inverted hostname-validation return check (8.8) October 29, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Oct 280day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in the Raritan PX3 PDU G4, firmware version 4.3.14, the intelligent rack power distribution unit from Raritan, a Legrand company (United States). A low-privilege authenticated session converts one diagnostics request into operating-system command execution in the product's web-service context, […]

Customers