deception technology Piergiorgio Venuti

Deception: Tricking Hackers to Secure Your Network

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

Deception: Comparison with Hackers on Their Ground

“We pay hackers their own coin by using the same defenses and techniques that malware uses against computer systems by modeling the attackers’ decision-making process.”

Introduction to Deception

Deception is a proactive cybersecurity approach that uses traps or decoys to trick attackers into revealing their presence. By transforming the computer system into a minefield of digital traps, Deception disrupts the decision-making process of attackers, exposing their tactics, techniques and procedures.

One of the leading Deception service providers is Secure Online Desktop. This company offers an Active Defense Deception solution that provides a highly interactive deception network designed to deceive and detect attackers.

The Secure Online Desktop Active Defense Deception Service

Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Deception service creates a simulated network environment that tricks attackers into thinking they have compromised a system. This environment consists of a variety of digital “decoys” or “decoys” that simulate real computer systems.

The Secure Online Desktop solution also uses advanced deception techniques such as the use of fake credentials to lure attackers into traps. In addition, the service continuously monitors the network environment for any suspicious or abnormal activity. When an attack is detected, the system sends a real-time alert, providing details about the attacker and his tactics.

Deception in the Killchain: An Approach Based on the MITER Framework

Deception can be integrated into any stage of the killchain, as described in the MITER ATT&CK Framework.

First, in the “Reconnaissance” phase, Deception traps can feed false information to attackers, confusing their preliminary research. Later, during the “Weaponization” and “Delivery” phases, traps can simulate apparent vulnerabilities to attract attackers.

In the “Exploitation” and “Installation” phase, the attacker, thinking he has been successful, may try to install malware or perform other malicious actions, further revealing his intentions and tactics. Finally, during the “Command & Control” and “Actions on Objectives” phases, the deceiver can continue to monitor the attacker’s activity, providing valuable information to prevent future attacks.

Practical Cases of Success of Deception

Deception has proven to be effective in various real-world scenarios. Here are some examples:

  1. TrapX Security ↗: TrapX used Deception to stop a hospital ransomware attack. The attackers had been fooled by digital traps, allowing the security team to isolate and neutralize the threat.
  2. Illusive Networks ↗: Illusive used Deception to help a banking organization prevent a data theft. The attackers had attempted to access fake credentials, revealing their presence and allowing the security team to block the attack.
  3. Acalvio ↗: Acalvio ha utilizzato la Deception per bloccare un attacco di spear phishing in un’organizzazione di energia. The digital traps fooled the attackers, allowing the security team to identify and stop the attack.

The Integration of Deception with SOC Services

The Active Defense Detection service of the Secure Online Desktop can be combined with the services of a Security Operations Center (SOC) to further increase network security. A SOC provides a team of security experts who constantly monitor the network to detect and respond to any threats.

Integrating Deception with a SOC allows information gleaned from digital traps to be combined with other sources of security data to provide a more complete view of network activity. Additionally, the information collected by the Deception can be used to improve the detection and response capabilities of the SOC.

For example, if a trap detects an attack, the SOC can quickly isolate the affected part of the network and take steps to neutralize the threat. At the same time, the information about the attack can be used to update the SOC’s detection signatures and improve its ability to detect similar attacks in the future.

Conclusion

Deception represents a step forward in the fight against cyber attacks. With its ability to deceive attackers, monitor their actions, and provide valuable insight into their tactics, deception can be a key element of an effective cyber defense strategy.

Using Secure Online Desktop’s Active Defense Detection service, combined with a SOC, can provide an unprecedented level of security, protecting your network from increasingly sophisticated cyber-attacks.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • User Enumeration in IServ Schoolserver Web Login September 11, 2025
    Posted by naphthalin via Fulldisclosure on Sep 10“I know where your children go to school.” The web front end of the IServ school server from IServ GmbH allows user enumeration. Responses during failed login attempts differ, depending on if the user account exists, does not exist and other conditions. While this does not pose a […]
  • Re: Apple’s A17 Pro Chip: Critical Flaw Causes Dual Subsystem Failure & Forensic Log Loss September 11, 2025
    Posted by Matthew Fernandez on Sep 10Can you elaborate on why you consider this high severity? From the description, it sounds as if this behaviour is fail-closed. That is, the effects are limited to DoS, with security properties preserved.
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 92): more stupid blunders of Windows' File Explorer September 8, 2025
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08Hi @ll, this extends the two previous posts titled Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 90): "Digital Signature" property sheet missing without "Read Extended Attributes" access permission and Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 91): yet another 30 year old bug of the […]
  • Critical Security Report – Remote Code Execution via Persistent Discord WebRTC Automation September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08Reporter: [Taylor Christian Newsome / SleepRaps () gmail com] Date: [8/21/2025] Target: Discord WebRTC / Voice Gateway API Severity: Critical 1. Executive Summary A proof-of-concept (PersistentRTC) demonstrates remote code execution (RCE) capability against Discord users. The PoC enables Arbitrary JavaScript execution in a victim’s browser context via WebRTC automation. […]
  • Submission of Critical Firmware Parameters – PCIe HCA Cards September 8, 2025
    Posted by Taylor Newsome on Sep 08*To:* support () mellanox com, networking-support () nvidia com *From:* Taylor Christian Newsome *Date:* August 20, 2025 *Dear Mellanox/NVIDIA Networking Support Team,* I am writing to formally submit the critical firmware parameters for Mellanox PCI Express Host Channel Adapter (HCA) cards, as detailed in the official documentation available here: […]
  • SEC Consult SA-20250908-0 :: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up in KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) September 8, 2025
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Sep 08SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20250908-0 > ======================================================================= title: NFC Card Vulnerability Exploitation Leading to Free Top-Up product: KioSoft "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solution (Mifare) vulnerable version: Current firmware/hardware as of Q2/2025 fixed version: No version numbers available CVE number:...
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in FFmpeg cache: Protocol (CacheEntry::size) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg cache: URL protocol implementation. The CacheEntry structure uses a 32-bit signed integer to store cache entry sizes (int size), but the cache layer can accumulate cached data exceeding 2 GB. Once entry->size grows beyond INT_MAX and new data is appended, an […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in DSCP Option Handling of FFmpeg UDP Protocol September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A vulnerability exists in the FFmpeg UDP protocol implementation ( libavformat/udp.c) where the dscp parameter is parsed from a URI and left-shifted without bounds checking. Supplying a maximum 32-bit signed integer (2147483647) triggers undefined behavior due to a left shift that exceeds the representable range of int. This results […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ Integer Overflow in UDP Protocol Handler (fifo_size option) September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08A signed integer overflow exists in FFmpeg’s udp.c implementation when parsing the fifo_size option from a user-supplied UDP URL. The overflow occurs during multiplication, which is used to compute the size of the circular receive buffer. This can result in undefined behavior, allocation failures, or potentially memory corruption depending […]
  • FFmpeg 7.0+ LADSPA Filter Arbitrary Shared Object Loading via Unsanitized Environment Variables September 8, 2025
    Posted by Ron E on Sep 08The ladspa audio filter implementation (libavfilter/af_ladspa.c) in FFmpeg allows unsanitized environment variables to influence dynamic library loading. Specifically, the filter uses getenv("LADSPA_PATH") and getenv("HOME") when resolving the plugin shared object (.so) name provided through the file option. These values are concatenated into a filesystem path and passed directly into […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}