Le applicazioni di Cyber Threat Analytics monitorano i log di sicurezza e il network per rilevare in maniera tempestiva eventuali infezioni malware (per esempio, gli attacchi zero day e i ransomware), la compromissione del sistema, le attività di “lateral movement”, pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket e altre tecniche avanzate d’intrusione. L’uso di un SOCaaS permette di estrapolare dati da sorgenti come firewalls, proxy, VPN, IDS, DNS, endpoints, e da tutti i dispositivi connessi alla rete con lo scopo di identificare modelli dannosi come il “beaconing”, connessioni a domini generati digitalmente, azioni eseguite da robot e tutti i comportamenti anomali. Il nostro sistema SOCaaS è dotato di intelligenza artificiale che arricchisce e trasforma gli eventi SIEM, in modo da identificare le minacce nell'intero ambiente IT, includendo anche le applicazioni aziendali critiche.   ##Quali sono i vantaggi a livello aziendale? L’uso di un SOCaaS. Qui sotto è riportata una lista con soltanto alcuni dei vantaggi che l’uso di un SOCaaS può comportare:  •	Rilevamento delle violazioni più rapido •	Riduzione dell'impatto delle violazioni •	Risposte e indagini complete sulle minacce •	Minori costi di monitoraggio e gestione •	Costi di conformità inferiori •	Ricevere segnalazioni quantificate e non soggettive su minacce e rischi  ##Casi d’uso SOCaaS Dopo una panoramica generale sui vantaggi che potrebbe offrire all’azienda l’uso di un SOCaaS, vediamo in quali contesti viene normalmente impiegato: •	Esecuzione anomala del programma  •	Schema di traffico robotico indirizzato verso un sito Web dannoso, non classificato o sospetto •	Connessioni a domini generati digitalmente •	Query DNS insolite •	Possibile attività di comando e controllo •	Spike in byte verso destinazioni esterne •	Modello di traffico insolito (applicazione/porta) •	Rilevamenti di exploit •	Agenti utente rari •	Durata insolita della sessione •	Connessioni a IP o domini nella blacklist •	DDOS / attività di scansione delle porte •	Numero anomalo di richieste non riuscite o reindirizzate •	SPAM mirato/tentativi di phishing ##Threat Models Analizzando gli indicatori di minaccia è possibile rilevare comportamenti correlati su più origini di dati, per rilevando anche tutte quelle minacce che solitamente passano inosservate. Molteplici indicatori di minaccia che si verificano in uno schema e che coinvolgono entità simili tendono a presentare un maggior rischio di costituire una minaccia reale.  I Threat Models definiscono questi schemi e combinano le policy e gli indicatori di minaccia per rilevare i comportamenti correlati su più sorgenti di dati, identificando le minacce che potrebbero passare inosservate. In seguito sono riportati alcuni dei Threat Models più comuni. ###Rilevamento dei Lateral Movement Questo Threat Model rileva i possibili scenari di “lateral movement”, impiegati dagli aggressori per diffondersi progressivamente in una rete alla ricerca di risorse e dati chiave. Autenticazione anomala •	Account che accede ad un host mai raggiunto prima •	Enumerazione di host •	Uso di credenziali di account esplicite su più host •	Rilevato un tipo/processo di autenticazione sospetto Uso sospetto di privilegi •	Rilevata attività di provisioning anomala •	Rilevata escalation sospetta dei privilegi •	Accesso anomalo agli oggetti della condivisione della rete Processo anomalo •	Processo/MD5 inconsueto rilevato •	Creazione sospetta di attività pianificate •	Rilevati cambiamenti sospetti alle impostazioni del registro di sistema ###Rilevamento di host compromessi Questo modello viene impiegato per rilevare gli host che mostrano segni di infezione e compromissione mettendo in relazione le anomalie basate su host e rete sulla stessa entità Anomalie nel traffico in uscita •	Traffico verso domini generati casualmente •	Traffico verso host noti come malevoli rilevato •	Numero anomalo di domini contattati •	Possibile comunicazione C2 Anomalie nell’endpoint •	Raro processo o MD5 rilevato •	Rilevato un uso sospetto di porte/protocolli da parte del processo •	Raro agente utente rilevato ###Rilevazione APT Rileva gli attacchi alle reti informatiche sanitarie, in cui lo scopo dell’aggressore solitamente è quello di ottenere un accesso non autorizzato a una rete con l'intenzione di rimanere inosservato per un periodo prolungato. Recon •	Possibili tentativi di phishing •	Rilevata scansione ed enumerazione della rete •	Rilevata elusione dei controlli Delivery •	Traffico verso domini generati in modo casuale •	Rilevata anomalia del traffico DHCP •	Rilevato traffico verso host notoriamente dannosi Exploit •	Rilevata attività di account terminati •	Rilevato traffico DNS anomalo •	Rilevato un tipo/processo di autenticazione sospetto •	Account che accede a un host mai visitato prima •	Rilevata anomalia di velocità Esegui •	Rilevato processo raro •	Possibile comunicazione C2 rilevata •	Amplificazione DNS anomala Exfiltration •	Rilevata infiltrazione di canali nascosti •	Rilevato uploads di dati su rete vianetwork ###Phishing Questo modello è in grado di rilevare possibili tentativi di phishing verso utenti all'interno dell'organizzazione. E-mail sospette in entrata •	Campagne di target e di spear phishing •	Possibili tentativi di phishing •	Campagne di phishing persistenti •	Email da mittenti/domini/indirizzi IP noti nella blacklist •	Allegati e-mail sospetti Anomalie del traffico in uscita •	Traffico verso domini generati casualmente •	Traffico verso host maliziosi noti •	Numero anormale di domini rari acceduti •	Possibile comunicazione C2 rilevata •	Rilevati proxyredirect sospetti Anomalie nei processi •	Processo o MD5 insolito rilevato •	Creazione sospetta di attività pianificate •	Rilevati cambiamenti sospetti alle impostazioni del registro di sistema ###Enumerazione di Host/Account su LDAP Utilizzato, solitamente, per identificare potenziali asset o enumerazioni di account sulla rete da parte di entità maligne. Esecuzione di processi sospetti •	Processo/MD5 anomalo rilevato •	Uso di possibili set di strumenti di enumerazione AD •	Rilevato l'uso di strumenti e utilità malevoli Scansione della rete •	Possibili account AD/privilegi di enumerazione •	Conteggio dei servizi LDAPo SMB •	Numero anomalo di richieste di ticket di servizio Kerberos •	Port scanning Anomalie di autenticazione •	Account che accedono a un host per la prima volta •	Uso di account mai visti prima sulla rete •	Numero anormale di richieste di autenticazione fallite ###Ricognizione seguita da un potenziale sfruttamento Questo modello di minaccia mira a identificare i tentativi di ricognizione della rete che hanno avuto successo, seguiti da indicatori di sfruttamento. Scansione esterna •	Scansione delle porte da host esterni •	Enumerazione di host da host esterni Scansione della rete •	Possibile conteggio di account/privilegi AD •	Enumerazione di servizi LDAP •	Numero insolto di richieste di ticket di servizio Kerberos •	Picchi nel traffico LDAP •	Enumerazione di servizi SMB Anomalie nei processi •	Rilevamento dei processi o MD5 anomali •	Creazione sospetta di attività pianificate •	Rilevati cambiamenti sospetti alle impostazioni del registro di sistema ##Conclusioni Abbiamo visto quali sono i maggiori casi d’uso SOCaaS, dando uno sguardo su alcuni dei modelli di minaccia più comuni che include nel suo sistema di protezione. Per avere informazioni sui modelli di minaccia relativi ai malware e sugli identificatori di minaccia visitate questo articolo.  Per qualsiasi informazione noi di SOD siamo pronti a rispondere a qualsiasi domanda. Piergiorgio Venuti

Use cases of a SOCaaS for companies part 1

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Cyber ​​Threat Analytics applications monitor security logs and the network to promptly detect any malware infections (for example, attacks zero day e i ransomware), the compromise of the system, the activities of “ lateral movement ”, pass-the-hash , pass-the-ticket and other advanced intrusion techniques. The use of a SOCaaS allows to extrapolate data from sources such as firewalls, proxies, VPN, IDS, DNS, endpoints, and from all devices connected to the network with the aim of identifying harmful models such as “beaconing”, connections to generated domains digitally, actions performed by robots and all anomalous behaviors.

Our system SOCaaS is equipped with artificial intelligence that enriches and transforms events SIEM, so you identify threats across your entire IT environment, including business-critical applications.

What are the-advantages at the enterprise-level?

The use of a SOCaaS. Below is a list with only some of the advantages that the use of SOCaaS can entail rapid detection of violations, reducing the impact of these. Additionally, a SOCaaS provides comprehensive threat responses and investigations, decreases monitoring and management costs, as well as compliance costs.

The use of a SOCaaS also allows you to receive quantified and non-subjective reports on threats and risks.

uso socaas

SOCaaS use cases

After a general overview of the advantages that the use of SOCaaS could offer to the company, let’s see in what contexts it is normally used .

A SOCaaS consists of elements that are very suitable to be applied in case of abnormal execution of applications, as well as in the analysis of bot traffic to a malicious website.

In other cases, SOCaaS identifies unusual DNS queries, a possible remote command and control activity, analyzes the spikes in bytes to external destinations and then also checks the traffic, relating it in an application / port context.

Other scenarios in which the use of SOCaaS is ideal are the detections of exploits, sessions of unusual duration, but also connections to IPs or blacklisted domains and anomalous activity in general.

Finally, it can also detect targeted SPAM attacks and phishing attempts.

Threat Models

By analyzing threat indicators it is possible to detect correlated behaviors on multiple data sources, to also detect all those threats that usually go unnoticed. Multiple threat indicators occurring in a scheme and involving similar entities tend to present a greater risk of posing a real threat.

The Threat Models define these patterns and combine threat policies and indicators to detect related behaviors across multiple data sources, identifying threats that may go unnoticed. Below are some of the more common Threat Models that are included in the use of a SOCaaS

Lateral Movement Detection

This Threat Model detects the possible scenarios of “ lateral movement “, used by attackers to progressively spread across a network in search of key resources and data. The signs of such an attack can be varied and we can divide them into three categories: Abnormal authentication, suspicious privileges, abnormal process.

Abnormal authentication is usually detectable by some clues. For example if an account accesses a host that has never been reached before. Or if explicit credentials are used on multiple hosts, or if a suspicious authentication type / process is detected.

Concerning suspicious privileges, here are some indicators detectable with the use of a SOCaaS:

  • abnormal provisioning activity
  • suspicious escalation of privileges
  • abnormal access to network share objects

An abnormal process is detected in this way through the use of a SOCaaS: an unusual process code, or the suspicious creation of scheduled tasks. Alternatively, suspicious changes to the registry settings may be detected.

Detection of compromised hosts

This model is employed in the use of SOCaaS to detect hosts showing signs of infection and compromise by relating host and network based anomalies to the same entity.

A possible alarm is given by anomalies in outgoing traffic . This occurs when traffic goes to random domains or known malicious hosts. In other cases, however, an abnormal number of domains contacted is another alarm bell detectable through the use of a SOCaaS.

anomalies in the endpoint are found when rare processes or suspicious use of ports or protocols by the process itself are found. One possibility is also to detect an unusual agent.

APT detection using a SOCaaS

Detection APT detects attacks on health care networks , where the attacker’s aim is usually to obtain a unauthorized access to a network with the intention of remaining undetected for an extended period.

This includes phishing attempts , detection of a network scan or circumvention of controls. In the delivery phase, however, traffic to random domains, an anomaly in DHCP traffic or traffic destined to known malicious hosts may be identified.

During an exploit , the indicators can be: the detection of activity from terminated accounts, anomalous DNS traffic, but also a suspicious authentication process. Another possible indicator identifiable with the use of SOCaaS is an anomaly in the speed of the network.

Through the use of a SOCaaS, cases of data exfiltration can also be detected. The signals in this case are l ‘Unauthorized upload of data over the network.

Detection model Phishing using SOCaaS

This model is able to detect possible phishing attempts towards users within the organization . We’ve talked about it in other articles as well, and here are some indicators of this type of attack. A wake-up call is definitely the detection of known phishing campaigns. It is also not uncommon for spear phishing attacks to be detected.

The use of a SOCaaS is also able to identify possible phishing attempts or persistent phishing campaigns, thanks to the comparison with emails from senders / domains / IP addresses known in the blacklists. As usual, beware of suspicious email attachments, but the use of a SOCaaS could automate, at least in part, the checks.

It is then possible to identify outbound traffic anomalies , for example that towards random domains, which is also a possible phishing signal. Classic traffic to malicious hosts, an abnormal number of rare domains accessed, can also be indicators.

I use socaas cover

Host / Account Enumeration on LDAP

Usually used to identify potential assets or account enumerations on the network by malicious entities.

Running suspicious processes

  • Abnormal process / MD5 detected
  • Use of possible sets of AD (Active Directory) enumeration tools
  • Detected use of malicious tools and utilities

Network scanning

  • Possible AD accounts / enumeration privileges
  • LDAP or SMB service count
  • Abnormal number of Kerberos service ticket requests
  • Port scanning

Authentication anomalies

  • Accounts accessing a host for the first time
  • Using never-before-seen accounts on the network
  • Abnormal number of failed authentication requests

Reconnaissance followed by potential exploitation

This threat model aims to identify successful network reconnaissance attempts, followed by indicators of exploitation.

External scanning

  • Scanning ports from external hosts
  • Enumerating hosts from external hosts

Network scanning

  • Possible count of AD accounts / privileges
  • Enumeration of LDAP services
  • Unsolved number of Kerberos service ticket requests
  • Spikes in traffic LDAP
  • Enumeration of SMB services

Anomalies in processes

  • Detection of abnormal processes or MD5
  • Suspicious creation of scheduled tasks
  • Suspicious changes to registry settings detected

Conclusions

We have seen what are the major SOCaaS use cases, taking a look at some of the most common threat models that it includes in its protection system. For information on malware threat patterns and threat identifiers visit this article.

Using a SOCaaS is a solid and highly valuable business solution, ask us what it can do for your business, we will be happy to answer any questions.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • Whistleblowersoftware.com: confidentiality and anonymity leakage to third parties July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02Whistleblowersoftware.com: confidentiality and anonymity leakage to third parties ## Summary The anonymous reporting flow on `whistleblowersoftware.com` encrypts report text end-to-end in the browser but does not extend the same guarantee to attachments and exposes the reporter's network identity and timing to a US-based third party. Together these […]
  • OpenBlow Multiple Deanonymization Vulnerabilities July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02OpenBlow Multiple Deanonymization Vulnerabilities Summary A production deployment was observed (HTTP archive of a full, real whistleblower submission) to route its anonymous reporting flow through Google. The intake CAPTCHA is Google reCAPTCHA, enforced as a mandatory, server-validated gate on report submission, and the UI additionally pulls a […]
  • Whistlelink: Site-access password exposed in web server access logs via GET query string July 2, 2026
    Posted by Red Nanaki via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02Whistlelink: Site-access password exposed in web server access logs via GET query string Severity: CRITICAL SUMMARY The Whistlelink reporting portal protects optionally-enabled, password-gated whistleblowing sites with a site-access password. When a visitor unlocks such a site, the client validates the password by issuing an HTTP GET request […]
  • APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-3 Safari 26.5.2 July 2, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-3 Safari 26.5.2 Safari 26.5.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/127685. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Web Extensions Available for: macOS Sonoma and macOS Sequoia Impact: A […]
  • APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-2 macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 July 2, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-2 macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/127595. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. IOGPUFamily Available for: macOS Tahoe Impact: An app may […]
  • APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-1 iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2 July 2, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02APPLE-SA-06-29-2026-1 iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2 iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/127594. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. IOGPUFamily Available for: iPhone 11 […]
  • pwnlift: symlink following and TOCTOU in privileged upload handler allow arbitrary file write as root July 2, 2026
    Posted by Greg via Fulldisclosure on Jul 021. Advisory information ----------------------- Title: Symlink following and TOCTOU in pwnlift upload handler allow arbitrary file write as root Advisory: https://github.com/GregDurys/security-advisories GHSA: GHSA-2v7v-rhpw-m9w4 CVE: CVE-2026-56815 Class: CWE-59 (Improper Link Resolution Before File Access), CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use Race Condition) CVSS: 7.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Date: 2026-06-27...
  • [KIS-2026-12] Control Web Panel <= 0.9.8.1224 (userRes) SQL Injection Vulnerability July 2, 2026
    Posted by Egidio Romano on Jul 02--------------------------------------------------------------------- Control Web Panel
  • [fulldis] CVE-2026-58451 - Horde Groupware IMP path traversal vuln July 2, 2026
    Posted by ㅤevan via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02this is my first time sending to a mailing list so ive chosen something easy. here goes: Summary: Horde Groupware’s IMP Webmail solution contains a path traversal/local file inclusion vulnerability which could be exploited to escalate privileges or bypass authentication (through CSRF if unauthenticated). the vulnerability is in […]
  • Samsung Galaxy Buds – Zero-Click HFP/A2DP Takeover via L2CAP Session Preemption (Vendor Response: Working as Intended) July 2, 2026
    Posted by 490h3fqwomf via Fulldisclosure on Jul 02Hello Full Disclosure, The following publicly available research describes a Bluetooth attack against Samsung Galaxy Buds that leverages connection arbitration behavior between HFP and A2DP profiles to preempt an active audio session. Title: Zero-Click HFP/A2DP Takeover via L2CAP Session Preemption Exploiting Seamless Earbud Connection Arbitration to Bypass Pairing […]

Customers