Dati ransomware pubblicati in chiaro Piergiorgio Venuti

The data exfiltrated during a double extortion ransomware attack is not public. Let’s dispel a myth

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Introduction

Ransomware attacks are becoming more common and lucrative for cybercriminals. In particular, the “double extortion” variant involves not only encrypting the victim’s data, but also stealing and threatening to publish it online for ransom. It is commonly believed that stolen data is not actually disclosed publicly, but remains confined to the dark web. In reality, things are not like that.

What is the dark web

The dark web refers to that part of the internet whose contents are not indexed by standard search engines. To access the dark web you need to use specific browsers such as Tor, which make browsing anonymous by encrypting and routing traffic through multiple nodes. Thanks to the anonymity it guarantees, the dark web is often used for criminal activities, such as the sale of stolen data.

However, the dark web is not as dark and mysterious as it is believed. Software like Tor is free and easily accessible to everyone. As a result, even sensitive data of companies that have ended up on the dark web can easily be leaked, even publicly.

Cybergangs also often publish unencrypted

Contrary to common belief, many of the criminal organizations that manage ransomware attacks end up publishing the stolen data of the victims even publicly, as an additional tool to pressure to obtain the ransom payment.

The forums and sites used for these publications are often hosted on non-EU servers, where there are no legal consequences, and are easily accessible to anyone. For example, the Conti group, one of the most active in the ransomware world, regularly publishes exfiltrated data through its “Conti Leaks” site.

Even lesser-known ransomware groups end up posting stolen data samples on public forums, then posting the URL to the victim, to demonstrate that the threat of full disclosure is real.

These publications take place on sites accessible to anyone with an internet connection. It is not necessary to resort to the dark web to access the stolen data.

Because cybergangs publish data in the clear

There are mainly three reasons that drive ransomware operators to publish the stolen data also publicly, and not only on the dark web:

  • Increase pressure on the victim: Publishing a sample of sensitive data is a powerful coercion tool to pressure the victim into paying to avoid full disclosure.
  • Damage the image of the target: Cybergangs often aim to inflict as much damage as possible on the victims, as well as to obtain a ransom. The publication of the data damages the reputation of the affected organization.
  • Advertising for your services: Showing the leaked data serves as proof of the effective capabilities of the ransomware group, allowing you to attract more customers for future attacks.

A million dollar business

Selling stolen data has become an extremely lucrative business for cybercriminals, second only to ransomware. Recent reports estimate that revenues from the sale of stolen data alone in 2021 netted hackers over $2 billion.

Sensitive company data can be sold for tens of thousands of euros on the dark web. But free sample posting further increases the destructive impact of the attack.

Conclusion: prevention is better than cure

The possibility that the data stolen by a ransomware attack will be publicly disclosed, and not only on the dark web, is therefore concrete and should not be underestimated. The consequences of such a data breach can be extremely serious for a company, causing reputational damage, legal fines and loss of intellectual property.

It therefore becomes crucial to invest in prevention, adopting modern security solutions such as SOC (Security Operation Center) platforms that monitor the corporate network 24 hours a day to identify and block attacks before hackers can steal or encrypt sensitive data.

In addition, advanced threat intelligence services such as those provided by companies such as Secure Online Desktop allow you to monitor the dark web to identify any stolen company data that is being offered for sale, to take immediate action and limit the damage.

Useful links:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • [REVIVE-SA-2026-001] Revive Adserver Vulnerabilities January 15, 2026
    Posted by Matteo Beccati on Jan 14======================================================================== Revive Adserver Security Advisory REVIVE-SA-2026-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2026-001 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: 2026-01-14 Risk Level: High Applications affected: Revive...
  • Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part 95): the (shared) "Start Menu" is dispensable January 11, 2026
    Posted by Stefan Kanthak via Fulldisclosure on Jan 10Hi @ll, the following is a condensed form of and . Windows Vista moved the shared start menu from "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Start Menu\" to "%ProgramData%\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\", with some shortcuts (*.lnk) "reflected" from the (immutable) component store below %SystemRoot%\WinSxS\ JFTR:...
  • Re: Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group) January 11, 2026
    Posted by Art Manion via Fulldisclosure on Jan 10Hi, CVE IDs *can* be assigned for SaaS or similarly "cloud only" software. For a period of time, there was a restriction that only the provider could make or request such an assignment. But the current CVE rules remove this restriction: 4.2.3 CNAs MUST NOT consider the […]
  • RIOT OS 2026.01-devel-317 Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in RIOT ethos Serial Frame Parser January 11, 2026
    Posted by Ron E on Jan 10A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the RIOT OS ethos utility due to missing bounds checking when processing incoming serial frame data. The vulnerability occurs in the _handle_char() function, where incoming frame bytes are appended to a fixed-size stack buffer (serial->frame) without verifying that the current write index […]
  • RIOT OS 2026.01-devel-317 Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in tapslip6 Utility via Unbounded Device Path Construction January 11, 2026
    Posted by Ron E on Jan 10A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the tapslip6 utility distributed with RIOT OS (and derived from the legacy uIP/Contiki networking tools). The vulnerability is caused by unsafe string concatenation in the devopen() function, which constructs a device path using unbounded user-controlled input. Specifically, tapslip6 uses strcpy() and strcat() […]
  • TinyOS 2.1.2 Stack-Based Buffer Overflow in mcp2200gpio January 11, 2026
    Posted by Ron E on Jan 10A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the mcp2200gpio utility due to unsafe use of strcpy() and strcat() when constructing device paths during automatic device discovery. A local attacker can trigger the vulnerability by creating a specially crafted filename under /dev/usb/, resulting in stack memory corruption and a process […]
  • TinyOS 2.1.2 printfUART Global Buffer Overflow via Unbounded Format Expansion January 11, 2026
    Posted by Ron E on Jan 10A global buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the TinyOS printfUART implementation used within the ZigBee / IEEE 802.15.4 networking stack. The issue arises from an unsafe custom sprintf() routine that performs unbounded string concatenation using strcat() into a fixed-size global buffer. The global buffer debugbuf, defined with a size […]
  • KL-001-2026-01: yintibao Fun Print Mobile Unauthorized Access via Context Hijacking January 8, 2026
    Posted by KoreLogic Disclosures via Fulldisclosure on Jan 08KL-001-2026-01: yintibao Fun Print Mobile Unauthorized Access via Context Hijacking Title: yintibao Fun Print Mobile Unauthorized Access via Context Hijacking Advisory ID: KL-001-2026-001 Publication Date: 2026-01-08 Publication URL: https://korelogic.com/Resources/Advisories/KL-001-2026-001.txt 1. Vulnerability Details      Affected Vendor: yintibao      Affected Product: Fun Print Mobile      Affected […]
  • Multiple Security Misconfigurations and Customer Enumeration Exposure in Convercent Whistleblowing Platform (EQS Group) January 6, 2026
    Posted by Yuffie Kisaragi via Fulldisclosure on Jan 05UPDATE: Following the publication of these vulnerabilities and the subsequent CVE assignments, the CVE identifiers have now been revoked. The vendor (EQS Group) contacted the CVE Program (via a CNA) and disputed the records, stating that the affected product is an exclusively hosted SaaS platform with no customer-managed […]
  • Panda3d v1.10.16 Uncontrolled Format String in Panda3D egg-mkfont Allows Stack Memory Disclosure January 6, 2026
    Posted by Ron E on Jan 05Panda3D’s egg-mkfont utility contains an uncontrolled format string vulnerability that allows disclosure of stack-resident memory. The -gp (glyph pattern) command-line option allows users to specify a formatting pattern intended for generating glyph texture filenames. This pattern is passed directly as the format string to sprintf() without validation or sanitization. […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}