Advanced Persistent Threat hacker Piergiorgio Venuti

Advanced persistent threats (APTs): what they are and how to defend yourself

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

An advanced persistent threat (APT) is a broad term used to describe an attack campaign in which an intruder, or a group of intruders, establishes an illicit and long-term presence on a network in order to extract highly sensitive data. The targets of these assaults, which are chosen and studied with great care, typically include large corporations or government networks. The consequences of such intrusions are vast, and include:

  • Theft of intellectual property (for example, trade secrets or patents)
  • Compromise of sensitive information (for example, private data of employees and users)
  • Sabotage of critical organizational infrastructures (for example, deletion of databases)
  • Total control takeover of the site

Executing an APT assault requires more resources than a standard attack on web applications. The perpetrators are usually teams of experienced cybercriminals who have substantial financial backing. Some APT attacks are government-funded and used as weapons of cyber warfare.

Common attacks, such as Remote File Inclusion (RFI), SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS), are frequently used by the perpetrators to establish a foothold in a targeted network. Then, Trojans and backdoor shells are often employed to expand that foothold and create a persistent presence within the perimeter.

Advanced Persistent Threat Laptop

Progression of Advanced Persistent Threats

A successful APT attack can be divided into three phases: 1) network infiltration, 2) expansion of the attacker’s presence, and 3) extraction of the accumulated data, all without being detected.

  1. Network Infiltration

As mentioned, every advanced persistent threat begins with an infiltration. Companies are typically infiltrated through the compromise of one of the following areas: web resources, network resources, or authorized human users. This is achieved either through malicious uploads or social engineering attacks. All these are threats regularly faced by large organizations.

Infiltrators may also simultaneously carry out a DDoS attack against their target. This serves both as a smokescreen to distract the network staff and as a means to weaken a security perimeter, making it easier to breach.

Once initial access is gained, attackers quickly install a backdoor malware shell that secures access to the network and allows for stealthy remote operations. Backdoors may also manifest as Trojans disguised as legitimate software.

  1. Expansion of Presence

After the foothold is established, attackers move to expand their presence within the network and thereby “create” the true advanced persistent threat.

This involves moving up the hierarchy of an organization, compromising staff members with access to the most sensitive data. By doing so, attackers are able to gather critical business information, including product line information, employee data, and financial records.

Depending on the ultimate goal of the attack, the accumulated data might be sold to a competing enterprise, altered to sabotage a company’s product line, or used to take down an entire organization. If sabotage is the motive, this phase is used to subtly gain control of more critical functions and manipulate them in a specific sequence to cause maximum damage.

For instance, attackers might delete entire databases within a company and then disrupt network communications to prolong the recovery process.

  1. Data Extraction

While an APT event is ongoing, the stolen information is typically stored in a secure location within the compromised network. Once enough data has been collected, the thieves must extract it without being detected.

Typically, white noise tactics are used to distract the security team so that the information can be moved out. This might take the form of a DDoS attack, again tying up network personnel and/or weakening the site’s defenses to facilitate extraction.

Advanced Persistent Threat hacker

Security Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

Proper detection and protection against APTs require a multifaceted approach from network administrators, security providers, and individual users.

Traffic Monitoring

Monitoring incoming and outgoing traffic is considered best practice to prevent the installation of backdoors and block the extraction of stolen data. Inspecting traffic within the corporate network perimeter can also help alert security personnel to any unusual behavior that may indicate malicious activity.

A web application firewall (WAF) deployed at the network edge filters traffic to web servers, thus protecting one of your most vulnerable attack surfaces. Among other functions, a WAF can help eliminate application-level attacks, such as RFI and SQL injection attacks, commonly used during the APT infiltration phase.

Traffic monitoring services for internal traffic, such as network firewalls, are the other side of this equation. They can provide a granular view that shows how users are interacting within your network, while helping to identify internal traffic anomalies (e.g., irregular logins or unusually large data transfers). The latter could indicate an ongoing APT attack. It is also possible to monitor access to file shares or system honeypots.

Lastly, incoming traffic monitoring services might be useful for detecting and removing backdoor shells. For comprehensive monitoring services, adopting the SOCaaS from SOD might be right for you.

advanced persistent threat security

Additional Measures Against Advanced Persistent Threats

In addition to the best practices already mentioned for preventing an advanced persistent threat on the corporate network, it is wise to take action on multiple fronts. In numerous other articles, we have discussed how beneficial it is for the security team to have a single place to monitor every point of the network. An excellent tool for this purpose is a SOC.

Our SOCaaS offers all the functionalities of a Security Operations Center without the burden of investing in equipment and specialized personnel. Moreover, thanks to UEBA technology, not only is our SOC able to retrieve and systematically store logs, but it is also actively involved in identifying suspicious user behavior.

These features are great for increasing the responsiveness of the security team and averting even attempts of advanced persistent threats against the corporate network.

To learn how we can help your company enhance its security, do not hesitate to contact us; we will be pleased to answer any questions.

Useful links:

Link utili:

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Code Security Review tool September 22, 2026
    Posted by E. Kellinis on Sep 22Karma Pro is an open source code review tool that can assist code reviewers with a multitude of useful tools. Karma Pro is a macOS source-code security scanner (AST base and Heuristics) that statically analyses projects in multiple languages. It's backed by an ML classifier trained on real patches […]
  • HP Advance / Output Central: unauthenticated SYSTEM RCE and two additional vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-89082/89083/89084) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Joe via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22HP Advance / HP Output Central Unauthenticated SYSTEM RCE, authorization bypass, and arbitrary file write/delete CVE-2026-89082, CVE-2026-89083, CVE-2026-89084 ================================================================ SUMMARY ================================================================ Vendor: HP Inc. Product family named by HP: HP Advance Products in HP's update table: HP AC Print & Scan; HP Output Central Components:...
  • CFP No cON Name 2k26 - Palma, Mallorca - Spain September 22, 2026
    Posted by Jose Nicolas Castellano on Sep 22No cON Name 2026 - Palma, Mallorca - Balearic Islands ************************************ *****  Call For Papers        ****** ************************************ https://www.noconname.org/call-for-papers/ Exact place not disclosed until a few weeks before due celebration.     * INTRODUCTIONfulldisclosure () seclists org The organization has  opened CFP proposals. No cON Name […]
  • CVE-2026-17613: Penpot cross-team file takeover via import-binfile (unpatched in 2.17.2) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Louis Sanchez via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22Posting this as an update rather than a first disclosure. The advisory went public on 2026-08-04 with no vendor fix. Penpot has shipped two releases since then, 2.17.1 and 2.17.2 -- the latter 14 days ago, on 2026-08-27 -- and I re-checked the code this morning: the […]
  • CVE-2026-44756: Pre-Auth RCE in SAP EPP Processing (ICM, Web Dispatcher, disp+work) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Raschin Tavakoli via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22nullFaktor Security Advisory < 2026-09-10 > =========================================================== Title: Pre-Authentication Remote Code Execution in SAP Extended Passport (EPP) processing library Affected Components: ICM, SAP Web Dispatcher, dialog work processes Vulnerability: Stack based Buffer Overflow CVE: CVE-2026-44756 Impact: Critical CVSS 4.0 Vector:...
  • [0day-rubbish] TigerGraph Community Edition 4.2.4 Default credentials plus GSQL TO_CSV arbitrary file write to SSH code execution (9.8) September 22, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Sep 220day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in TigerGraph Community Edition 4.2.4. Type: Default credentials plus GSQL TO_CSV arbitrary file write to SSH code execution (CWE-798) CVSS: 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) Impact: command execution as the tigergraph service user (uid 1001), which owns the engine, graph data, catalog […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Teltonika RutOS 00.07.06.21 Authenticated ipsec.lua logread command injection with reflected output (8.8) September 22, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Sep 220day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in Teltonika RutOS 00.07.06.21. Type: Authenticated ipsec.lua logread command injection with reflected output (CWE-78) CVSS: 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) Impact: root command execution on the router, with command output reflected into the JSON response Authentication: authenticated administrator Full technical analysis and […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-10 Xcode 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-10 Xcode 27 Xcode 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149040. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Xcode IDE Available for: macOS Tahoe 26.6 and later Impact: An […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-9 Safari 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-9 Safari 27 Safari 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149039. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Safari Available for: macOS Sequoia and macOS Tahoe Impact: A malicious […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-8 visionOS 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-8 visionOS 27 visionOS 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149038. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Accelerate Framework Available for: Apple Vision Pro (all models) Impact: Processing […]

Customers