virtual server Piergiorgio Venuti

Virtual server

A virtual server or virtual private server (VPS) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Virtual server – Pros/Cons

Pros:

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Virtual server – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Virtual server – False myths

    1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
    2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

    Check out the Cloud Server

 

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

VPS Metered – Cloud location

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Demo Cloud Servers

Server Cloud

VPS

Alternative to the NAS

New templates for VPS

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS feed: Unknown Feed Unknown Feed

RSS feed: Full Disclosure Full Disclosure

  • Code Security Review tool September 22, 2026
    Posted by E. Kellinis on Sep 22Karma Pro is an open source code review tool that can assist code reviewers with a multitude of useful tools. Karma Pro is a macOS source-code security scanner (AST base and Heuristics) that statically analyses projects in multiple languages. It's backed by an ML classifier trained on real patches […]
  • HP Advance / Output Central: unauthenticated SYSTEM RCE and two additional vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-89082/89083/89084) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Joe via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22HP Advance / HP Output Central Unauthenticated SYSTEM RCE, authorization bypass, and arbitrary file write/delete CVE-2026-89082, CVE-2026-89083, CVE-2026-89084 ================================================================ SUMMARY ================================================================ Vendor: HP Inc. Product family named by HP: HP Advance Products in HP's update table: HP AC Print & Scan; HP Output Central Components:...
  • CFP No cON Name 2k26 - Palma, Mallorca - Spain September 22, 2026
    Posted by Jose Nicolas Castellano on Sep 22No cON Name 2026 - Palma, Mallorca - Balearic Islands ************************************ *****  Call For Papers        ****** ************************************ https://www.noconname.org/call-for-papers/ Exact place not disclosed until a few weeks before due celebration.     * INTRODUCTIONfulldisclosure () seclists org The organization has  opened CFP proposals. No cON Name […]
  • CVE-2026-17613: Penpot cross-team file takeover via import-binfile (unpatched in 2.17.2) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Louis Sanchez via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22Posting this as an update rather than a first disclosure. The advisory went public on 2026-08-04 with no vendor fix. Penpot has shipped two releases since then, 2.17.1 and 2.17.2 -- the latter 14 days ago, on 2026-08-27 -- and I re-checked the code this morning: the […]
  • CVE-2026-44756: Pre-Auth RCE in SAP EPP Processing (ICM, Web Dispatcher, disp+work) September 22, 2026
    Posted by Raschin Tavakoli via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22nullFaktor Security Advisory < 2026-09-10 > =========================================================== Title: Pre-Authentication Remote Code Execution in SAP Extended Passport (EPP) processing library Affected Components: ICM, SAP Web Dispatcher, dialog work processes Vulnerability: Stack based Buffer Overflow CVE: CVE-2026-44756 Impact: Critical CVSS 4.0 Vector:...
  • [0day-rubbish] TigerGraph Community Edition 4.2.4 Default credentials plus GSQL TO_CSV arbitrary file write to SSH code execution (9.8) September 22, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Sep 220day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in TigerGraph Community Edition 4.2.4. Type: Default credentials plus GSQL TO_CSV arbitrary file write to SSH code execution (CWE-798) CVSS: 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) Impact: command execution as the tigergraph service user (uid 1001), which owns the engine, graph data, catalog […]
  • [0day-rubbish] Teltonika RutOS 00.07.06.21 Authenticated ipsec.lua logread command injection with reflected output (8.8) September 22, 2026
    Posted by disclosure via Fulldisclosure on Sep 220day Rubbish Research Team is publicly disclosing a vulnerability in Teltonika RutOS 00.07.06.21. Type: Authenticated ipsec.lua logread command injection with reflected output (CWE-78) CVSS: 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) Impact: root command execution on the router, with command output reflected into the JSON response Authentication: authenticated administrator Full technical analysis and […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-10 Xcode 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-10 Xcode 27 Xcode 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149040. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Xcode IDE Available for: macOS Tahoe 26.6 and later Impact: An […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-9 Safari 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-9 Safari 27 Safari 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149039. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Safari Available for: macOS Sequoia and macOS Tahoe Impact: A malicious […]
  • APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-8 visionOS 27 September 22, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Sep 22APPLE-SA-09-14-2026-8 visionOS 27 visionOS 27 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/149038. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. Accelerate Framework Available for: Apple Vision Pro (all models) Impact: Processing […]

Customers