virtual server Piergiorgio Venuti

Virtual server

A virtual server or virtual private server (VPS) is a fully-fledged server with its own operating system and well-defined hardware features only that unlike a classic server it shares physical resources with other virtual machines in this way more VPS can be run simultaneously on the same server (hypervisor).

This virtualization technique allows significant cost savings and an optimization of hardware resources as it is possible to run multiple operating systems on the same hardware.

 

Virtual server – Pros/Cons

Pros:

   ♦ Migration: It is possible to “move” (migrate) a VPS from one server (hypervisor) to another (even without interruption of service).

Example: You have created a VPS on a hypervisor in Italy and you want to move it to a server in America. With a VPS, as long as the Cloud Provider has another Datacenter in America, this can be done quickly.

   ♦ Scalability: It is the possibility of increasing or decreasing the hardware resources (CPU, RAM, Disk, etc) without rebuilding the VPS and in some cases without restarting it in full transparency to users who use the services provided.
Example: A VPS of 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB of disk has been created but after a few months we realize that the RAM memory is insufficient for the services provided and it is necessary to increase it. With a VPS it is very easy to solve this problem, just increase the RAM from the configuration panel and the new configuration will be applied (in the case of linux systems without the need to reboot).

   ♦ Autoscaling: It is the possibility to increase or decrease the resources (scaling) automatically according to well defined hardware policies. This technique is extremely valid in cases of load peaks.
Example: A VPS has been created with 2 cores, 1 GB of RAM and 20 GB but in some periods of the year due to the high user access these resources are not sufficient, then in this case it is possible to configure these policies:

a) If the CPU is at 90% for more than 1h then the CPU of a core increases every 30min for a maximum of 6 cores and then if the CPU is less than 10% for more than 1h decrease the CPU of a core every 30 min up to a minimum of 2 cores.

b) If the RAM is 99% for more than 1h then increase the RAM of 1Gb every 30min for a maximum of 32Gb and then if the RAM is less than 50% for more than 1h decrease the RAM of a core every 30 min until at a minimum of 1Gb.

   ♦ Low cost: by comparing the cost of a VPS to that of a fiscal server like hardware resources, the cost of a VPS is much lower, especially considering that some cost items are already included in the VPS fee. :
   a) Energy consumption;  

   b) Internet band;

   c) Cost of public IP addresses;

   d) Costs related to housing (cooling, surveillance, etc); 

   e) Firewall;

   f) Technical assistance.

Cons:

   ♦ Shared resources: Depending on the configurations and characteristics of the Cloud Provider, some hardware resources, such as the CPU, could be shared so performance may be lower than a physical server. This condition is not always true as it is possible to request a 100% allocation on all hardware resources to your Cloud Provider.

Virtual server – Limits:

  1. ♦ OS Virtualization: Not all operating systems and platforms can be virtualized (Eg AS400, Apple OS).
  2. ♦ Band: Although this is not an inherent problem of virtualization itself there could be latency differences in the Internet connection between a physical server in the company and a VPS if users are predominantly within the company and if the company has not an adequate Internet line.
    Example: A physical server in the customer’s DMZ is accessed by its LAN users via a 10Gb line, if the server is virtualized and becomes a VPS at a Cloud provider, access to it is transmitted via the client’s Internet line which may be more slow.

Virtual server – False myths

    1. ♦ A VPS does not have the same performance as a physical server: By allocating 100% of the physical resources and correctly dimensioning a VPS the latter has nothing to envy to a physical server from a performance point of view.
    2. ♦ A VPS is less secure than a physical server: A VPS can have the same degree of security as a physical server because it is possible to adopt the same security measures (Firewall, Antivirus, Hardening, VPN) applicable to a Fiscal server.

    Check out the Cloud Server

 

[btnsx id=”2931″]

Useful links:

VPS Metered – Cloud location

IaaS | Cloud | Infrastructure as a Service

Demo Cloud Servers

Server Cloud

VPS

Alternative to the NAS

New templates for VPS

Free Microsoft Windows licenses

Let’s Encrypt Free Certificates for all Webhosting users

CloudFlare free Plesk extension for Webhosting users

Share


RSS

More Articles…

Categories …

Tags

RSS Unknown Feed

RSS Full Disclosure

  • CyberDanube Security Research 20260408-1 | Multiple Vulnerabilities in Siemens SICAM A8000 April 14, 2026
    Posted by Thomas Weber | CyberDanube via Fulldisclosure on Apr 14CyberDanube Security Research 20260408-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Multiple Vulnerabilities product| Siemens SICAM A8000 CP-8050/CP-8031/CP-8010/CP-8012 vulnerable version|
  • CyberDanube Security Research 20260408-0 | Remote Operation Denial of Service in Siemens SICAM A8000 April 14, 2026
    Posted by Thomas Weber | CyberDanube via Fulldisclosure on Apr 14CyberDanube Security Research 20260408-0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- title| Remote Operation Denial of Service product| Siemens SICAM A8000 CP-8050/CP-8031/CP-8010/CP-8012 vulnerable version|
  • SEC Consult SA-20260414-0 :: Improper Enforcement of Locked Accounts in WebUI (SSO) in Kiuwan SAST on-premise (KOP) & cloud/SaaS April 14, 2026
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 14SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20260414-0 > ======================================================================= title: Improper Enforcement of Locked Accounts in WebUI (SSO)             product: Kiuwan SAST on-premise (KOP) & cloud/SaaS  vulnerable version:
  • SEC Consult SA-20260401-0 :: Broken Access Control in Open WebUI April 3, 2026
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 02SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20260401-0 > ======================================================================= title: Broken Access Control             product: Open WebUI  vulnerable version:
  • SEC Consult SA-20260326-0 :: Local Privilege Escalation in Vienna Assistant (MacOS) - Vienna Symphonic Library April 3, 2026
    Posted by SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab via Fulldisclosure on Apr 02SEC Consult Vulnerability Lab Security Advisory < 20260326-0 > ======================================================================= title: Local Privilege Escalation product: Vienna Assistant (MacOS) - Vienna Symphonic Library  vulnerable version: 1.2.542 fixed version: - CVE number: CVE-2026-24068              impact: high homepage:https://www.vsl.co.at/          ...
  • Apple OHTTP Relay: 14 Third-Party Endpoints, 6 Countries, Zero User Visibility April 3, 2026
    Posted by Joseph Goydish II via Fulldisclosure on Apr 02SUMMARY Apple&apos;s Oblivious HTTP relay for Live Caller ID Lookup (iOS 18+) routes traffic through 14 third-party endpoints across six countries. These include an anonymous Delaware LLC sharing data with OpenAI, a Russian endpoint (Yandex), and a Swiss GmbH whose privacy policy names "The Legal Entity […]
  • [KIS-2026-06] MetInfo CMS <= 8.1 (weixinreply.class.php) PHP Code Injection Vulnerability April 3, 2026
    Posted by Egidio Romano on Apr 02--------------------------------------------------------------------------- MetInfo CMS
  • [CVE-2026-33691] OWASP CRS whitespace padding bypass vulnerability April 3, 2026
    Posted by cyber security on Apr 02A vulnerability was identified in OWASP CRS where whitespace padding in filenames can bypass file upload extension checks, allowing uploads of dangerous files such as .php, .phar, .jsp, and .jspx. This issue has been assigned CVE‑2026‑33691. Impact: Attackers may evade CRS protections and upload web shells disguised with whitespace‑padded […]
  • APPLE-SA-03-24-2026-10 Xcode 26.4 March 29, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Mar 28APPLE-SA-03-24-2026-10 Xcode 26.4 Xcode 26.4 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/126801. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. otool Available for: macOS Tahoe 26.2 and later Impact: An app […]
  • APPLE-SA-03-24-2026-9 Safari 26.4 March 29, 2026
    Posted by Apple Product Security via Fulldisclosure on Mar 28APPLE-SA-03-24-2026-9 Safari 26.4 Safari 26.4 addresses the following issues. Information about the security content is also available at https://support.apple.com/126800. Apple maintains a Security Releases page at https://support.apple.com/100100 which lists recent software updates with security advisories. WebKit Available for: macOS Sonoma and macOS Sequoia Impact: Processing maliciously […]

Customers

Newsletter

{subscription_form_1}